The WHO and ILO Have Announced Plans to Dictate Our Thoughts
The WHO and ILO Have Announced Plans to Dictate Our Thoughts
Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity – 10/1/2022
On March 2, 2022 the World Health Organization (WHO) published an article titled COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide – Wake-up call to all countries to step up mental health services and support. After battering humanity with mask mandates, social distancing, business closures, financial ruin, forced quarantines, forced isolation, and complete and total lock-downs of whole nations while announcing that a virus would kill all of us I’m shocked the number of people suffering from a mental health disorder was only at 25%. Their endorsed treatments – ventilators and fire days of lethal remdisivir followed by their death jab recommendations have caused millions of deaths. The WHO is just as much to blame for this as the governments who followed the recommendations are. Because the WHO refuses to recognize their own roll in this travesty, they have taken in upon themselves to demand adherence to their mental health recommendations. The International Labor Organization (ILO) has declared their willing participation in the WHO’s mental health project. Their goal is to control all human behavior, including speech.
There are two documents which which have been pushed to the front of this mental health project. There is a mountain of pages which serve as background information. The first piece of this puzzle is the WHO’s Mental Health at Work page. The WHO has determined that 60% of the world’s population works (4.8 billion people) and estimates that 15% of those workers (as of 2019) suffered from mental illnesses (720 million). That would be 9% of workers suffering from mental illness by the WHO’s definition of the matter. That means that 91% of workers will have to bow down to the will of the ill because of the WHO and ILO and their determination to ‘fix’ mental illness.
First of all, the WHO and ILO have been bending over backwards since March 2020 trying to destroy the social fabric of the world. That basic unit is the family. They have always sought to destroy the family; however, with Covid-19 social cohesion was shattered, on purpose, and the WHO and ILO couldn’t be happier of prouder of their efforts to effect this. Their efforts got them to where they are – in a position (according to them) to ‘fix’ mental health issues for everyone everywhere. It’s a demand for surveillance of everyone, everywhere, all the time.
Decent work is a code word for destroying the economic systems of the world. As such, the WHO is all about it. WHO claims that decent work promotes mental health by providing a livelihood, a sense of purpose, community inclusion, and regimented activities. The WHO’s description of decent work sound like an open air prison to me. Above and beyond their desire to create open air labor camps the WHO writes:
“Safe and healthy working environments are not only a fundamental right but are also more likely to minimize tension and conflicts at work and improve staff retention, work performance and productivity. Conversely, a lack of effective structures and support at work, especially for those living with mental health conditions, can affect a person’s ability to enjoy their work and do their job well; it can undermine people’s attendance at work and even stop people getting a job in the first place.”
So, the WHO wants to turn every place of work on earth into something we all enjoy doing. It’s a rare day that I enjoy being at work. I don’t really share all that much in common with anyone I work with one or two exceptions. It really does prevent my happiness because it is next to impossible to speak to most of the people I work with. The problem is that I try to read and learn something everyday and if I bring any of those topics up, my co-workers roll their eyes. The people I work with rarely read anything. They have no idea what I am even talking about for the most part. But the part of all of that disgusts me the most is that there are several people who are actually proud of their ability to know everyone on their football teams roster but unable to even define globalism. I have actually had to explain who Anthony Fauci is to people, for instance. Is the WHO going to address these issues? Nope, they will make every effort to get everyone like me to shut up while they are at work because the idea of a 90-95% orchestrated culling of humanity is mentally dangerous to speak about and can lead to feelings which are not happy.
The risk factors the WHO notes are:
“under-use of skills or being under-skilled for work; excessive workloads or work pace, understaffing; long, unsocial or inflexible hours; lack of control over job design or workload; unsafe or poor physical working conditions; organizational culture that enables negative behaviours; limited support from colleagues or authoritarian supervision; violence, harassment or bullying; discrimination and exclusion; unclear job role; under- or over-promotion; job insecurity, inadequate pay, or poor investment in career development; and conflicting home/work demands.”
According to the WHO, I have a work-related mental illness and so does virtually every single person on earth. I have been both over-skilled and under-skilled. I have had jobs in which I would work 12 or 13 days in a row for 12 to 16 hours a day. I have never had control over my job’s design nor the workload required of me. Organizations cannot have behaviors – only individuals can. All bosses have a point where they must put their foot down and say no more. I’ve been forced to work with violent criminals, suffer harassment and bullying; I’ve been discriminated against and excluded. I don’t get promoted but then I don’t get demoted either. There is no job security (the WHO is making sure of that), I’ve only been paid decently at one job I’ve ever had. And all of us have conflicting schedules at some point in our work careers. I guess, despite all of these risk factors, I have some form of mental illness, at least in the WHO’s view. The same probably applies to anyone reading this. And the WHO has decided that getting rid of all of these risk factors is the proper way to move forward in order to ‘fix’ work for 9% of the population.
The actions the WHO recommends to achieve mental health objectives include preventing risk factors, protecting and promoting mental health at work, making sure that those with mental issues are able to thrive, and creating atmospheres where change is possible.
To elaborate on each of these targets the WHO writes of the first:
“Preventing mental health conditions at work is about managing psychosocial risks in the workplace. WHO recommends employers do this by implementing organizational interventions that directly target working conditions and environments. Organizational interventions are those that assess, and then mitigate, modify or remove workplace risks to mental health. Organizational interventions include, for example, providing flexible working arrangements, or implementing frameworks to deal with violence and harassment at work.”
I’ve had some really good bosses and some really bad bosses. I’ve never once desired to have any of my supervisors manage my psychology nor my social interactions. Never once.
In order to protect and promote mental health, the WHO has found it fit to have managers and workers go through training courses to raise awareness and further dictate allowed interactions based on mental health impacts. The WHO also wants the workplace to provide for interventions to reduce mental health related workplace incidents.
Everyone at the workplace is supposed to make sure, at all costs, those with mental problems are accommodated by hiring them in the first place, allowing them to not meet deadlines, extra time off, modified schedules, and allowing them to return to work after being absent from work for extended periods.
The WHO’s final paragraph reads:
“Both governments and employers, in consultation with key stakeholders, can help improve mental health at work by creating an enabling environment for change. In practice this means strengthening:
“Leadership and commitment to mental health at work, for example by integrating mental health at work into relevant policies.
“Investment of sufficient funds and resources, for example by establishing dedicated budgets for actions to improve mental health at work and making mental health and employment services available to lower-resourced enterprises.
“Rights to participate in work, for example by aligning employment laws and regulations with international human rights instruments and implementing non-discrimination policies at work.
“Integration of mental health at work across sectors, for example by embedding mental health into existing systems for occupational safety and health.
“Participation of workers in decision-making, for example by holding meaningful and timely consultations with workers, their representatives and people with lived experience of mental health conditions.
“Evidence on psychosocial risks and effectiveness of interventions, for example by ensuring that all guidance and action on mental health at work is based on the latest evidence.
“Compliance with laws, regulations and recommendations, for example by integrating mental health into the responsibilities of national labour inspectorates and other compliance mechanisms.”
The ILO, doing their part to ruin work, issued, in partnership with the WHO, Mental Health at Work. This document is where the rubber meets the road. This is where the WHO’s intentions will be forced upon workers everywhere. Through the ILO, national labor departments will adopt these mental health guidelines. The basis for all of this is found on page 5:
“Effective policies and action to improve mental health at work are critical to uphold the human right to good health, including mental health, and to advance progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDG 3 on health and SDG 8 on decent work for all.”
Wherever anyone sees SDG’s, the intent is The Great Reset. It’s designed to destroy civilization in order to rebuilt it along the lines of Brave New World. The problem is that human civilization has not arranged itself into the WHO utopia on it’s own. As soon as the WHO and ILO identify their desire to mandate their version of utopia, they shift to the fear tactic, also on page 5:
“The costs to society of inaction are significant. Making mental (or physical) health care available comes at a cost. However, the indirect costs of reduced productivity (which can include premature death, disability and reduced productivity while at work) often far outstrip the direct costs of care.”
So, it’s going to be massively expensive, socialist payment schemes will need to be enacted, and if we don’t we will all end up dead, disabled, and businesses will lose productivity. Fear is being used to convince us all to act in the way the WHO and ILO have decided we should. Also on page 5:
“Stakeholders in the world of work can help to create an enabling environment for change by securing commitment and funds, tackling stigma and discrimination, coordinating multisectoral and participatory approaches and strengthening the evidence for effective interventions.”
And here is the action! Instead of being able to go to work, complete the tasks we get paid for, and go on about our way to do whatever we do before we have to go back, we are going to have stakeholders dictating our behaviors and speech in the name of protecting mental health. In case you happen to be wondering, you are not a stakeholder in these decisions. Actually, if you are reading this, you are probably going to be fired from your job because you understand all of this and want nothing to do with it. Well, you won’t have a choice. The WHO and ILO are promising that anyone who goes to work, does their job, and goes home will be let go because in order to do that, we often have to encourage those who aren’t pulling their weight to step it up, which will be declared a mental health catastrophe. Every once in a while I need to be told I’m screwing around too much and to step it up too. “Hey idiot, let’s go,” doesn’t hurt my feelings it means someone is telling me to refocus on what I am there for. But holy cow – the interventions which will be needed if the wrong person hears that.
The recommendations in this document are completely based in equal outcomes. Governments and employers (the stakeholders in this ‘utopia’) are directed to undertake the following steps. As described on page 8:
“For governments, this means working with employers’ and workers’ organizations to develop new, or review and revise existing, employment and OSH laws, policies and guidance to include provisions on mental health in parity with those on physical health. This implies ensuring that the definition of occupational health always covers both physical and mental health, as well as including mental disorders in the national lists of occupational diseases, in line with the ILO List of Occupational Diseases (revised 2010). Other provisions may, for instance:
“ensure that can be adapted to workers’ physical and mental capabilities, or ensure transfer to alternative suitable employment without any loss of pay or seniority;
“emphasize the need for preventative measures (rather than reactive measures such as compensation);
“provide guidance on assessing and managing psychosocial risks, including violence, harassment and discrimination;
“protect wherever possible the employment and income of workers affected by mental health conditions; and
“ensure that workers and their representatives participate in identifying psychosocial hazards and are consulted in any action taken to mitigate the associated risks – as for any other hazards and risks at work.
“Governments also have a role in building capacities for psychosocial risk management among occupational health services. They should strengthen the role of these services in preventing, monitoring and proposing remedial action for harm caused by psychosocial risks, especially to support lower-resourced employers such as small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
“For employers, mitigating psychosocial risks can similarly be achieved by embedding mental health into their existing OSH management system, not as an optional add-on but as an essential element. Integration should extend across every component of the management system: policy, organization, planning and implementation, evaluation and action for improvement.
“Activities to improve mental health at work should prioritize collective measures and should be based on a sound risk assessment and management process, done with the meaningful involvement of workers and their representatives. Workers and their representatives should be involved in identifying psychosocial hazards at work and should be informed and trained about the measures adopted to prevent the associated risks. Circumstances which may elicit risks – such as restructuring, or changes in staffing, processes, work methods or other substantive matters at work – should be managed in a way that prevents or minimizes psychosocial risks.
“Ultimately, having a strong legal framework aimed at preventing psychosocial risks and protecting mental health at work is not enough if not supported by adequate compliance mechanisms, including through the advice, investigation and enforcement action carried out by competent and trained labour inspectors.”
This is all an effort to destroy human interactions and individual responsibility. I know exactly what is expected of me at my job. I have understood these expectations at all of the jobs I have held. For instance, I worked briefly at UPS. I was fired after having too many mis-scans, sending too many packages to the wrong place. The reason this happened was my misguided belief in the scanner knowing the zip codes when I was, in fact, expected to memorize all of the zip codes. Should someone doing this be placed in unloading? The pay wouldn’t necessarily have to be the same for the position. The WHO/ILO is demanding any mentally ill person who does that should get the same pay after being moved to unloader. They don’t deserve the pay.
The entire framework creates a surveillance network designed to psychologically evaluate every employee in the workforce. I don’t trust psychologists nor psychiatrists and don’t want to participate in any such surveillance. I have no faith in OSHA and really don’t want to see them with WHO-approved psychosocial risk checklists. I really don’t want any government to psychologically assess me because – well – they just don’t need to know. That is part of the utopia the WHO/ILO is creating.
What is being suggested is also discriminatory against anyone without a mental illness. It creates a dual system of mentally ill people with special protections. The rest of us, having to cater to the mentally ill, will be subjected to disciplinary policies in order to protect their feelings. Managers are not going to move people to other jobs within the company, they are going to fire offenders of their policies.
I have literally looked coworkers in the eye and asked them if they are stupid before. And, yes, these people were doing stupid things in order to get me to ask them the question. What kind of intervention would that call for? I’m sure that I would get to go to more training after the first time. I’m sure there would be some kind of intervention the second time. And I’m sure that if it happened again I would just get fired. And asking people if they are stupid is not even the tip of the iceberg for the way some people talk to others at the workplace.
How many times have coworkers gotten under your skin badly enough to want to smack them and tell them to knock it off? Never? I’ve never met anyone who has not wanted to smack someone to get them to stop doing something at some point in working with them. I have never acted on the impulse; however, I have seen people who have. When I was a brand new employee I was physically shoved off of a platform because I wasn’t moving fast enough. Did the old guy deserve to get fired? No. I told him to never ever put his hands on me again or there would be problems. He never did put his hands on me. Of course, under this WHO/ILO scam, I would have likely gotten the training demanding that I stop making threats to those physically assaulting me – especially because I really think that he may have been mentally retarded. Am I supposed to accommodate his desire to just shove people when they aren’t doing what he thinks needs to be done?
Finally, who, exactly, is going to be doing any productive work after we get directed to be ever-vigilant to mental health risk factors. People will be out of work for weeks, thus useless to productive goals. Good workers who choose not to play this stupid game will be fired. Incompetence will be rewarded. The WHO/ILO is purposefully setting out to control our behaviors by controlling what acceptable thoughts include for the workplace. The result will be the destruction of any kind of enjoyable employment for anyone. The Great Reset retards (there’s that word again) applauds this while all of the rest of us will be forced onto a universal basic income and the social credit score it entails because of, in part, actions such as this.