Let’s Not Reform Elections
Let’s Not Reform Elections
Associated Press (AP) has never been all that worried about publishing truth. I write this in the face of AP’s description of itself:
“The Associated Press is an independent global news organization dedicated to factual reporting. Founded in 1846, AP today remains the most trusted source of fast, accurate, unbiased news in all formats and the essential provider of the technology and services vital to the news business”
At one time, maybe this was true. Today, it is the opposite of truth because AP will only endorse the same narratives handed to the likes of CNN and NBC. So it really shouldn’t be a surprise that their coverage of the democrat-clown show is always in favor of the democrat’s plans. Their coverage of democrat-sponsored so-called ‘election reform’ bills is no different.
As my first exhibit in this effort to indict AP as partisans themselves (something I am already assured of and, likely you are assured of as well) I offer the opening paragraph of Mary Clare Jalonick’s Bills would curtail objections at future Jan. 6 counts:
“Members of Congress have officially objected to the results in four of the last six presidential elections, a partisan practice that has been legal for over a century but became much more fraught after a violent mob of then-President Donald Trump’s supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol last year.”
A violent mob was in DC on June 1, 2020 when the dregs of American society set fire to St. John’s Church. Actually 2020 was full of incidents featuring mob activity including riots, assaults, rapes, murders, and lots and lots of fire. But the protest on January 6, 2020 at the Capitol building was not one of them. It was a peaceful protest which had elements of government agitators within it to demonize the event. Where is Ray Epps? Oh he’s free to set up others demanding justice while 500 people are sitting in a jail cell merely for being there and refusing to say what the FBI wants them to say. AP is aligning themselves with the US version of KGB.
The bills about which the AP writes are the H.R. 8873 and S. 4573. The House version would allow state courts to decide if there was a catastrophic event which occurred preventing a candidate to win. If the court finds that there was a catastrophic event then it will be able to allot extra time for the vote to take place. A catastrophic event WILL be used as a false flag forever to get the person democrats want into office:
“In this section, the term ‘catastrophic event’ means a major natural disaster, an act of terrorism, or a widespread power outage, so long as such event is on a scale sufficient to prevent a substantial portion of a State’s electorate from casting a ballot on the day fixed by section 1 of this title, or such event causes a substantial number of ballots already cast in a State to be destroyed or rendered unreadable.”
The House Bill would also see to it that by December 14 of a presidential election year the Governor of each state (including the mayor of Washington D.C.) certifies the vote and sends the certification to the Archivist. It will then be up to the Archivist to hold onto that record for a year and get copies to Congress. If a candidate has a problem with the certification they are permitted to go judge shopping among the various district courts. If the governor refuses to certify an election, the court will have the power to appoint whoever they want to send the certification.
Allowing anything about the election to be done electronically is always a bad idea. Because the House only manages to get really awful bills to the Senate, they included a passage permitting the electronic transfer of the certification. They also seek to raise the bar from one House and one Senate member being able to object to an elector to 33% of the Senate (34 Senators) and 20% of the House (87 House Members).
The Senate’s version is not as expansive as the House version. As AP explained the bills:
“Members on both sides of the Capitol have been working on the revisions to the Electoral Count Act since the 2021 insurrection, saying the law’s vague language was not robust enough protection against Trump’s overt attempts to subvert the will of the people. The bills would also clarify that the vice president’s role is solely ceremonial and try to prevent states from creating slates of illegitimate electors, as Trump’s allies tried to do.
“The House bill is more expansive than the Senate bill, and the two sides will eventually have to resolve their differences into a single measure. That includes the House language with new grounds for any objection, which would restrict the process even further.
“Under the House legislation, no member could make an objection unless it fell under a strict set of parameters that relate to the Constitution — that the state is not validly a state, if the state submits too many electoral votes or if a candidate is not eligible, for example.
“House Republicans argued against the legislation by saying it was a political attack on Trump, noting the frequent Democratic objections over the years. It only received nine Republican votes, all from members who are not returning to the House next year.”
Yes, the House version is now in the Senate. The nine idiotic wastes of human breath calling themselves republicans who voted for this were, Cheney, Gonzalez (OH), Herrera Beutler, Jacobs (NY), Katko, Kinzinger, Meijer, Rice (SC), and Upton – none of who will be back for the next session. These nine, along with every democrat in the House (save Vargas who did not vote) voted to allow one-party rule in the United States forever. It was Lofgren who sponsored this dumpster fire with Cheney cosponsoring it. The Senate version has 25 cosponsors and was sponsored by Susan Collins – another idiot with a single horn growing out of her ugly face. There is not one useful Senator who has decided to cosponsor Collins senatorial effort to achieve one party rule – not one.
And by party, we need to get over the democrat republican divide and understand that these two parties are mostly worthless. There are human representatives and globalist (transhuman) representatives. Bipartisan actions are just globalists getting together on an action. Globalists hate this nation, and really hate its people. That was the charm of a Donald Trump – he loves this nation and loves the people despite his many flaws and refusals to admit when he is clearly incorrect. This is why he is so widely hated among the elected overlords who are globalists in elephant and donkey clothing.
So it is really cute when this globalist faction of US representation decide to try to rely on the Constitution. For instance, Amendments 12, 16, and 17 are all unconstitutional because it can not alter the original. Yet, each of those listed above do violate the constitution. Amendment 12 changes the way the president and vice president are elected. It’s unconstitutional to do that. Amendment 16 allows the federal government to directly tax individuals which is, again unconstitutional. Amendment 17 violates states’ rights by depriving them of any representation in the federal government which is, again unconstitutional. It is also unconstitutional to have one federal representative for every 765,000 citizens – it’s supposed to be one for every 30,000. Yes, I am absolutely demanding that there be over 11,000 House Members. I am also telling you, reader, that it is unconstitutional for us to vote in a Senate election as well as unconstitutional to vote in a presidential election.
AP doesn’t mention this because it does not sit well with their intentions of helping globalism achieve its goals, but Article II Section I of the US Constitution reads, in part:
“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
“The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.”
This cannot be changed; however it has been changed drastically. Three have only been two elections which were valid in the United States ever. Those two elections occurred before 1800. Article I Section II sets the rules for House Members including how many there are 1 Member for each 30,000 in a state with at least one Member from each state). Article 1 Section III starts off, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.” That kind of destroys Amendment 17. I often advocate that the quickest way to get this stupid federal government out of our lives is to repeal Amendment 17 followed by Amendment 16. After that, things would change in a big hurry.
But it’s interesting, amusing, and terrifying all at the same time whenever the globalists try to use the constitution as their basis for something. Each of these election reform bills are entirely unconstitutional on their face. They should not have even been introduced in either chamber because the people introducing them know they are unconstitutional. So I slap my face and shake my head. But the trend is increasingly terrifying. It’s terrifying because one there is a one party rule it will start taking its orders from a centralized global cabal. The types of people aligning the US with Communist China don’t have any respect for pesky little obstacles like those who ideologically disagree with them, borders, or sovereignty (especially at an individual level). All they want is power.
All AP wants is for them to get their power. So they write articles which are inflammatory towards those who want a human future while supporting anything globalists try to do. Calling themselves unbiased is disturbingly repugnant. I might as well call myself unbiased, even though anyone who reads anything I write would know better. I’m not a liar and do my best to be as accurate as possible.
Coincidentally, AP didn’t find the Mark Houck story important enough to cover. The FBI raided this Catholic man in front of his terrified children because he pushed a baby-murderer away from his 12-year-old after the baby-murderer began harassing the child at an anti-abortion protest. AP won’t touch that with a thousand foot pole. They won’t touch it because they know the case is outrageous, it doesn’t serve their agenda, and they hate God. At the end of the day AP hates God. It’s why they demonize anyone who is pro-humanity, a human supremacist in the words of Alex Jones. We are the only thing standing in the way of the globalists getting their way.
And God, I believe, wants us to be humans. He wants us to follow His Laws and love His Son – but he wants us to be humans – as He made us. The proof is that there was a flood which wiped out all of the debauchery and evil, including the purposeful mutation of the DNA of the entities of those times. Next time there will be no flood – the rainbow (not the flag – a reprehensible appropriation of one of God’s Covenant's) promises us that. No, the shofar will sound and all will bow to their Creator. Not only are AP’s and their globalist-decreed agenda unconstitutional, they are unholy and evil.
Bless God and God bless.