How are the UN Sustainability Goals Going? Goal 17 of 17.

Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity

6/2/2022

The seventeen United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the goals of the Great Reset. The SDGs were adopted in 2015 by United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The cover for the SDGs were that they would provide relief for disabled peoples by 2030 according to Agenda 2030. To fully understand Agenda 2030, a review of Agenda 21 should be undertaken, which I will not do here. In this article I will focus on the 17th SDG:

Revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development

Goal 17 wraps up all of the loose ends of the 16 prior goals. It seeks to garner more money for UN Programmes and national adherence towards funding commitments. Goal 17 also makes a lot of demands upon the sovereign nations of the world in regards to national policy alignment with UN goals. The 19 targets of goal 17 are:

“17.1 Strengthen domestic resource mobilization, including through international support to developing countries, to improve domestic capacity for tax and other revenue collection

“17.2 Developed countries to implement fully their official development assistance commitments, including the commitment by many developed countries to achieve the target of 0.7 per cent of ODA/GNI to developing countries and 0.15 to 0.20 per cent of ODA/GNI to least developed countries; ODA providers are encouraged to consider setting a target to provide at least 0.20 per cent of ODA/GNI to least developed countries

“17.3 Mobilize additional financial resources for developing countries from multiple sources

“17.4 Assist developing countries in attaining long-term debt sustainability through coordinated policies aimed at fostering debt financing, debt relief and debt restructuring, as appropriate, and address the external debt of highly indebted poor countries to reduce debt distress

“17.5 Adopt and implement investment promotion regimes for least developed countries

“17.6 Enhance North-South, South-South and triangular regional and international cooperation on and access to science, technology and innovation and enhance knowledge sharing on mutually agreed terms, including through improved coordination among existing mechanisms, in particular at the United Nations level, and through a global technology facilitation mechanism

“17.7 Promote the development, transfer, dissemination and diffusion of environmentally sound technologies to developing countries on favourable terms, including on concessional and preferential terms, as mutually agreed

“17.8 Fully operationalize the technology bank and science, technology and innovation capacity-building mechanism for least developed countries by 2017 and enhance the use of enabling technology, in particular information and communications technology

“17.9 Enhance international support for implementing effective and targeted capacity-building in developing countries to support national plans to implement all the sustainable development goals, including through North-South, South-South and triangular cooperation

“17.10 Promote a universal, rules-based, open, non-discriminatory and equitable multilateral trading system under the World Trade Organization, including through the conclusion of negotiations under its Doha Development Agenda

“17.11 Significantly increase the exports of developing countries, in particular with a view to doubling the least developed countries’ share of global exports by 2020

“17.12 Realize timely implementation of duty-free and quota-free market access on a lasting basis for all least developed countries, consistent with World Trade Organization decisions, including by ensuring that preferential rules of origin applicable to imports from least developed countries are transparent and simple, and contribute to facilitating market access

“17.13 Enhance global macroeconomic stability, including through policy coordination and policy coherence

“17.14 Enhance policy coherence for sustainable development

“17.15 Respect each country’s policy space and leadership to establish and implement policies for poverty eradication and sustainable development Multi-stakeholder partnerships

“17.16 Enhance the global partnership for sustainable development, complemented by multi-stakeholder partnerships that mobilize and share knowledge, expertise, technology and financial resources, to support the achievement of the sustainable development goals in all countries, in particular developing countries

“17.17 Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships Data, monitoring and accountability

“17.18 By 2020, enhance capacity-building support to developing countries, including for least developed countries and small island developing States, to increase significantly the availability of high-quality, timely and reliable data disaggregated by income, gender, age, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic location and other characteristics relevant in national contexts

“17.19 By 2030, build on existing initiatives to develop measurements of progress on sustainable development that complement gross domestic product, and support statistical capacity-building in developing countries”

I’m going to cover these one by one.

“17.1 Strengthen domestic resource mobilization, including through international support to developing countries, to improve domestic capacity for tax and other revenue collection[.]”

The UN wants every nation to have higher revenues in order for the national governments of the world to have more control over their citizenry. Several objectives are completed by raising government revenues, the most important one being the fact that most, in not all, of the governments on earth are ideologically tethered to, and/or financially dependent upon, the UN. The citizens in the nations, the ones who get up and go to work everyday – around the world – will have less disposable income and less say over their own lives. Universal healthcare means no healthcare outside of what the government approves. The Department of Education in the United States, in tandem with teachers unions, have destroyed education in the nation. Universal background checks would end up being just another surveillance tool the US government would direct against random citizens. In order for all of this to happen, the United States would need to fund the programs.

Compared to GDP, the revenue governments collected from taxes, social contributions, fines, fees, rent and income from property or sales in the world was 26.51% in 2019. Grants, of course, are revenue but are not shown here because a lot of nations are getting billions in grants and spending them wildly inappropriately. Certain taxes like Social Security are not included here either. In 2019, Kiribati was collecting 114.8% revenue compared to GDP while Somalia was collecting zero. In 2015 Kiribati was collecting 120.49%. In 2012, Timor was taking in revenue at a rate of 341.52% of their GDP. Since 1972, the US had a low of 15.7% in 2009, a high of 20.57% in 2000, and in 2020 it was 17.64%. China collected even less, percentage wise, than the United States did in 2018 – 16.54%. Many nations, especially those in western and central Europe, collected much higher revenues compared to GDP than the United States or China did.

If all of these nations have all of this money coming in – the US had about $3.7 trillion in in revenue in 2020; China had about $2.4 trillion in revenues in 2018 – it shouldn’t be all that difficult to balance a budget. Under the graph tracking the percentage of domestic taxes compared to domestic budgets; however, only taxes are included, everything from the previous graph is excluded. The amounts will be smaller for the US and China as I calculated them. If the taxed amount was only half of what was calculated – $1.85 trillion in the US and $1.2 trillion in China – it’s still an absolute ton of money. No nation on earth managed to pay for more than 34.12% (Seychelles) of their budget with taxes as of each nation’s last reporting date. Two nations breached the 35% mark between 2015 and 2020 – Timor in 2015, and Iceland in 2016. The US managed 9.97% in 2020 and China managed 9.05% in 2018.

The money has to come from somewhere. One way governments can get money is to just print it and go further into debt. That’s what fiat currency is – backed by nothing except the good faith and credit of the nation printing it – payable by the citizens of the nations which do this. There is a reason that the United States has a deficit of over $30 trillion.

“17.2 Developed countries to implement fully their official development assistance commitments, including the commitment by many developed countries to achieve the target of 0.7 per cent of ODA/GNI to developing countries and 0.15 to 0.20 per cent of ODA/GNI to least developed countries; ODA providers are encouraged to consider setting a target to provide at least 0.20 per cent of ODA/GNI to least developed countries[.]”

ODA means official development assistance and GNI means gross domestic income. To the US, by these metrics, it represents a yearly expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars. In 2020, $146.55 billion would have been required to go to developing nations with an additional $31.4 to $41.9 billion earmarked to be sent to least developed nations. In 2021 the developed nations making up the G7, (US, Japan, UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Canada) had a combined GDP over $38.645 trillion with 28 developed nations unaccounted for in this measure. The totals the G7 was supposed to pay under this target comes to $270.5 billion to developing nations in addition to between $58 billion and $77.3 billion.

This is welfare paid for with debt which the developed nations of the world have promised to have their working-classes pay off over time, largely in the form of income taxes. Also, this is only one form of welfare which is ordered to be paid by the developed nations to the developing nations. Other gimmicks which the UN expects developed nations to pay for are included in documents like the Paris Climate Accord which would require at least $1 trillion a year from just the United States for mitigating the made-up man-made climate change ‘disaster.’

Sweden, Luxembourg, and Norway exceeded their commitments under this ruse (0.7% and 0.2%) in 2017. The United Kingdom and Denmark approached their obligations with 0.7% and 0.74%, respectively. Germany and the Netherlands registered in the 0.6% to 0.67% range. All of the rest of the developed nations came in under 0.5% or lower. Only Sweden and the United Kingdom met their obligations to the least developed countries.

“17.3 Mobilize additional financial resources for developing countries from multiple sources[.]”

The first indicator for this target has a graph which displays, “Foreign direct investment refers to direct investment equity flows in an economy. It is the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, and other capital. This series shows net outflows of investment from the reporting economy to the rest of the world, and is divided by GDP.” Overall, in the world of 2020, 0.76% of global GDP was invested in this way. Hungary is listed as having foreign direct investments of 97.35% of its 2020 GDP, and Hong Kong 25.38%. In 2016, China invested over 1% of its GDP in foreign investments and in 2020 it stood at 0.75%. The United States in 2007 had over 3% of GDP directly invested in foreign enterprises and in 2020 it was 0.73%. Any nation with a negative value is being bought up more than they are doing the buying. The nations which were being bought-up the most as of 2019 were Malta, Timor, Ireland, Netherlands, Cayman Islands, and Switzerland.

The second graph shows remittances to and from nations from migrants in a foreign country. It shows money which is leeched from a nation due to illegal immigration as well as money sent home by legal migrants. In 1979 the rate of remittances in the world, as a share of GDP, was 0.36% and in 2018 it was 0.75%. World GDP in 1979 was $34.04 trillion and in 2018 it was $85.883 trillion thus the actual amounts of remittances were $122.544 billion in 1979 and $644 billion in 2018. Using GDP as part of the metric makes it really easy to hide what is really going on here.

What is going on here with both of these goals is increased globalization and international interdependence. The target here is promoting national entanglements which are great during times of peace and completely disastrous during even minor times of disagreement. The result of wars between major players interconnected through globalization is on full display in the Russian/ Ukraine war. The result of global shutdowns on globalization is also on complete display as hundreds of millions of people are now on the brink of starvation and the number is growing. The UN hasn’t, nor has any other global institution or globally-aligned think tank, apparently, ever thought of ways to actually make the world less globalized, less ‘just in time’, and more resilient and self-sustaining in the face of economic and social shocks. Instead the UN is doubling down on erasing borders, weakening national sovereignty, and pushing for global austerity measures.

“17.4 Assist developing countries in attaining long-term debt sustainability through coordinated policies aimed at fostering debt financing, debt relief and debt restructuring, as appropriate, and address the external debt of highly indebted poor countries to reduce debt distress[.]”

Target 17.4 is measured by the UN as “Debt service as a proportion of exports of goods and services.” By this metric, the nations of Guyana (43.48%), Timor (10.37%), Guinea (6.99%), Ethiopia (6.06%), and Ireland (5.87%) had the highest rates of debt service in 2020.

COVID-19 mitigation efforts helped to shut the world’s economies down, resulting in trillions of dollars in losses and increased debt around the globe. The IMF’s response to the issues resulting from their forced shutdowns in response to mitigating COVID-19 impacts reads:

“The IMF has responded to the coronavirus crisis with unprecedented speed and magnitude of financial assistance to member countries, especially to protect the most vulnerable and set the stage for inclusive and sustainable recovery. As IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva noted ahead of the April 2021 IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings: ‘The global economy is on firmer footing as millions of people benefit from vaccines. But while the recovery is underway, too many countries are falling behind and economic inequality is worsening. Strong policy action is needed to give everyone a fair shot—a shot in the arm to end the pandemic everywhere, and a shot at a better future for vulnerable people and countries.’ (speech). In this trying time, the IMF continues to support countries on the path to recovery by providing policy advice, financial support, capacity development, and debt relief for the poorest.”

The IMF appears to have meted out more loans while, at the same time, giving debt relief to some of the same nations. I’d like a free loan too and I won’t ever get one. Future lock-downs will sound like a windfall to the nations of the world who reaped economic benefits while the world was directed to be shut down.

“17.5 Adopt and implement investment promotion regimes for least developed countries[.]”

The indicator for this target includes two graphs which track bilateral investment treaties with developing and least developed nations. In 2021 there were 183 of signed bilateral investment treaties made with developing nations and 120 signed bilateral investment treaties with least developed countries. Bilateral development treaties which were in-force in 2021 with developing nations totaled 176 and with least developed nations totaled 102.

In 2021 usnews.com ranked the 10 most corrupt nations on earth from lowest to highest and the rankings reads; Azerbaijan, El Salvador, Lebanon, Kazakhstan, Guatemala, Russia, Brazil, Mexico, Columbia, and Iraq. Another site, worldpopulationreview.com, has a more expansive list of the most corrupt countries in the world and the top 11 (some of the nations are tied with one another) most corrupt to less corrupt (of nations which reported) read; Somalia, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen, Venezuela, Sudan, Equatorial Guinea, Libya, Haiti, Democratic Republic of Congo, and North Korea. Transparency International also reported corruption statistics from 2021 and their list has most of the same nations as worldpopulationreview.com does; however, Afghanistan and Turkmenistan made appearances in this list, and, while Haiti is absent, another tie adds Burundi to the list as well (for a total of 12).

All of these nations are some of the places developed and wealthier developing nations are supposed to give their money to for investment. Where does the money go? It goes into a black hole. The money is in Swiss and Cayman Island bank accounts, or was laundered. The billions of dollars for investment projects the UN is championing under this target are not assisting the plight of the poorest and most in need people in the world because it is being stolen. It’s not hard to get clean drinking water to people – the political will to make it happen is lacking, the politicians are black-holing the vast majority of the funds they are receiving, and the UN does no follow up and have no accountability because they lack any transparency. Government officials and politicians are not the only corrupt ones; however, the NGO’s working in those areas are just as corrupt. The idea is ‘I’ll get mine and be good, and it doesn’t matter how many suffer in order for me to get mine.’ This should be the UN motto, unless it’s ‘we want to kill everybody through war, murder, famine, and death because we are the global government which thinks we are riding each of the four horses.’

Revelation 6 reads, in full (Complete Jewish Bible):

“1 Next I watched as the Lamb broke the first of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living beings say in a thundering voice, ‘Go!’ 2 I looked, and there in front of me was a white horse; its rider had a bow and was given a crown; and he rode off as a conqueror to conquer. 3 When he broke the second seal, I heard the second living being say, ‘Go!’ 4 Another horse went out, a red one; and its rider was given the power to take peace away from the earth and make people slaughter each other. He was given a great sword. 5 When he broke the third seal, I heard the third living being say, ‘Go!’ I looked, and there in front of me was a black horse, and its rider held in his hand a pair of scales. 6 Then I heard what sounded like a voice from among the four living beings say, ‘Two pounds of wheat for a day's wages! Six pounds of barley for the same price! But don't damage the oil or the wine!’ 7 When he broke the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living being say, ‘Go!’ 8 I looked, and there in front of me was a pallid, sickly-looking horse. Its rider's name was Death, and Sh'ol followed behind him. They were given authority to kill one-quarter of the world by war, by famine, by plagues and with the wild animals of the earth. 9 When the Lamb broke the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been put to death for proclaiming the Word of God, that is, for bearing witness. 10 They cried out in a loud voice, ‘Sovereign Ruler, HaKadosh, the True One, how long will it be before you judge the people living on earth and avenge our blood?’ 11 Each of them was given a white robe; and they were told to wait a little longer, until the full number of their fellow-servants should be reached, of their brothers who would be killed, just as they had been. 12 Then I watched as he broke the sixth seal, and there was a great earthquake, the sun turned black as sackcloth worn in mourning, and the full moon became blood-red. 13 The stars fell from heaven to earth just as a fig tree drops its figs when shaken by a strong wind. 14 The sky receded like a scroll being rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved from its place. 15 Then the earth's kings, the rulers, the generals, the rich and the mighty - indeed, everyone, slave and free - hid himself in caves and among the rocks in the mountains, 16 and said to the mountains and rocks, “Fall on us, and hide usk from the face of the One sitting on the throne and from the fury of the Lamb! 17 For the Great Day of their fury has come, and who can stand?’”

Now, make no mistake, I am well aware that there have been many people who have come out and stated the seals have been opened because of certain global events which have occurred. In my OPINION, these can easily relate to long time spans and could constitute the following.

John the Revelator, the author of Revelations, would have easily identified the bow and arrow seen in the first seal which was opened, and this very well may have been Rome which set out to conquer all of the time until it collapsed. The fall of the Roman Empire is generally accepted as having occurred in 476 AD.

The second seal, the red horse, could be the rise of humanity’s reliance upon science which has eroded faith in God around the world. The main political outcropping of this science is wrapped up in Marxism which rests firmly on the sandstone created by Darwin. Darwin, and by-and-large all science in this day and age seeks to replace God with humanism in order to support it’s claims that God made man incorrectly and they can fix the shortcomings. Darwin published his still unproven theory, the Origin of the Species in 1859 and Marx published the murderous Communist Manifesto in 1848 with his equally useless co-author Engels. These two books have wrecked billion of lives. Combined, Darwin basically concluded there is no God because of evolution which has enchanted scientists since it’s publication, and Marx’s writings have been used to implement political outcroppings based on the evolutionary theory. In my opinion both are equally evil, incorrect, and directly attempt to destroy the morality of the teachings of the Bible.

The third beast loosed upon the world could very well have been the COVID-19 mitigation efforts and everything which has followed. Food costs are multiples of what they once were two years ago. Likewise, fuel and engine additives have been multiplied. Various nations have started implementing food voucher systems through technological discoveries, namely, biometric identification, which absolutely represents the mark of the beast. This started, globally in 2020.

The earth is stated to have been created by God in 4044 BC. Between 4044 BC and the fall of Rome there were 4,520 years. There were 1,383 years between the fall of the Roman empire and Darwin publishing his trash theory which has been given a status in law. Between Darwin and COVID-19’s global mitigation effort there were 161 years. By this calculation, sometime in 2027 the fourth seal will be broken. In my opinion this seems an applicable date. As the UN demands their goals be accomplished by 2030, and the completion of any of their goals dictates mass austerity, enslavement, and outright death of those non-compliant to their demonic ends, this seems, if the UN’s plans are based on Biblical timelines, apt. If my calculations are not correct, I thank God almighty for allowing humanity to continue existing. I am still sounding a battle cry to fight against the insidious evil represented at the UN, the governments of the nations of the world in line with UN plans such as the SDG’s, and the NGO’s and multinational businesses which have come to dominate the policy directives of the nations of the world.

“17.6 Enhance North-South, South-South and triangular regional and international cooperation on and access to science, technology and innovation and enhance knowledge sharing on mutually agreed terms, including through improved coordination among existing mechanisms, in particular at the United Nations level, and through a global technology facilitation mechanism[.]”

The UN has chosen to only track the last passage of this gigantic sentence, namely, the global technology facilitation mechanism – broadband access. According to this graph, out of every 100 people on the planet, 15.68 of those people have a broadband subscription in 2019. At each nation’s last reported date, Gibraltar, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Monaco had rates over 50 people per 100 with broadband. Chad and South Sudan reported no one with broadband subscriptions in 2019, while Guinea and Democratic Republic of Congo reported 0.01 per 100 people. Almost half the list is nations with under 10 people per 100 having a broadband subscription.

There are several issues with the way this is measured. Typically only one broadband connection will suffice for all of a families internet access. That means that in a house of 5, only one will actually have the subscription – larger households will skew the numbers downward. Also, one broadband connection point in a remote town would enable hundreds to access the internet, but, again only one person would hold the subscription. If a tribal leader of 200 villagers set up a broadband access point to service the entire village, there would only be on subscription with 200 users. Another issue I take with this graph is that there are other technologies which allow for internet access.

Digging a little bit deeper into this, Chad and South Sudan, despite these nations complete lack of broadband subscriptions in 2019, were recorded in 2017 as having 6.5% and 7.98% of their populations with internet access, respectively. Eritrea and Somalia, according to the same chart, had 1.31% and 2% of their population with access to the internet in 2017, respectively.

When saturation of internet accessibility occurs, people become dependent upon it. The more people who are dependent upon high-speed internet access, the more people who can be controlled by threats of censorship and actual instances of censorship. Disruptions in service, whether due to weather events or service provider issues, can, and will, have negative impacts upon the ability of individuals and businesses to communicate with others dependent upon internet communications. Outages are common enough; however, when the added layer of government and business censorship is added (usually accomplished through artificial intelligence) to keep thinking people from asking poignant questions of their leaders, their government officials, or even of those with different opinions – that individuals digital presence is deleted. The ability for big tech (in collusion with the governments which they serve, including international bodies and NGO’s) to turn a person’s online reach way down or to even delete their entire account for ‘repeatedly’ violating their idiotic community standards is, in and of itself, a crime against humanity.

The UN did not track broadband access of the world for no reason – they are gauging their own online reach. During COVID-19, criticizing government lock-downs got accounts deleted. Demanding business stay open got people arrested in 3D space as well as their online accounts deleted. Stating the obvious fact that wearing masks cannot and will NEVER work to reduce the spread of viral particles got an individual’s online account banned. These demons which mandated all of this later came out and admitted to all of these claims being accurate, but the people who violated their controls still have to pay fines, still sit in jail, and still have their online accounts restricted. The UN wants to restrict the access of real information based on real life experiences because if we cannot communicate, we cannot tell the online world about the atrocities the UN, or anyone else (Pfizer and Moderna come to mind) aligned with the UN, is committing.

There are three things a military will try to stop their enemy from doing – shooting back, communicating, and traveling. The monsters at the UN (there are many more lurking in the shadows) have pushed every nation to disarm (many have), are trying to destroy any ability for anyone with rational sense to communicate (this SDG target), and have done everything they can to make mobility as difficult as possible until they end mobility for the masses of us altogether.

The other parts of this target which I did not just rant about, are stating that the science (thus, the technology) of developed nations needs to be shared. Cutting edge science, the world around, is masked in national security. Autonomous robots, for example, can be used to increase productivity at factories while lowering costs. At the same time, the absolute cutting-edge autonomous robots, including drones, infused with AI, are reserved for military applications and include such abilities as collision avoidance even while in a swarm, autonomous identification of human targets to eliminate, and facial recognition systems. What would a nation like DRC or PRNK do with this kind of ability? The nation of China offers some guidance – imprison and/or eliminate (quietly) anyone not following what the government wants the people there to do. What would a tribal-warlord do? Exterminate his enemies. This is the world the UN is promising for us. The UN is using nations transferring scientific knowledge to other nations as pawns so their mass-murdering intentions will not be blamed.

A clear example of this is Bill Clinton’s transfer of technology to China which allowed China to enhance their nuclear capabilities. Today, the US and China are throwing threats at one another with China making all kinds of threats against numerous nations and the US offering an anemic, yet calculated, response to oppose China’s ambitions. In a 2019 piece which aired on Fox News, a piece which, apparently, zero people in Biden’s administration took heed of goes as follows:

“China analyst Gordon Chang warned in an interview with Fox News on Monday that China is ‘configuring its military to kill Americans.’

Speaking with Fox’s ‘Bill Hemmer Reports,’ Chang warned that Chinese leader Xi Jinping has increasingly referenced a ‘mandate of heaven to rule the entire world.’ Chang said Xi and other Chinese officials have invoked the idea of global domination and said they believe ‘they not only have the right to do it, they have the obligation to do it.’”

If you really feel that I, and Gordon, are incorrect here, take a look at the way China operated for millennia until Mao took over and Kai-Shek was forced the flee to Taiwan, all because of Western-backed funding. China has always, and always will, see themselves as the center of the entire universe and demand remunerations from any other society in acknowledgment of their alleged fact. They will also always hate Japan which has also seen themselves as the center of the universe.

I will not mince words here – modern China, with their inherent racism, fascist government, hatred of religious belief, and their cultural predilections, was chosen as the model society by the UN because ‘China’ is what the UN wants to see around the entire world. Of course, the UN wants to usurp China’s boundaries and instill the cultivated values of the Politburo across the entire globe with their own twist on China – namely the denizens of the world are subservient to UN whims and dictates. China has recognized this and, having recognized that their own nation is stronger that UN words, has began to set it’s own course, apart from international standards, and do whatever it’s dark heart desires.

Relating to the target at hand, the UN would like nothing more than for China’s censorship regime to be the way of the globe, with the UN in charge of it. That includes scientific ‘knowledge’ being transferred around the globe. Any dissent to the UN-approved narrative will be detected, silenced, discriminated against, and ultimately squashed. The ‘offender’ asking a common-sense scientific question will be placed in a digital gulag. The real goal is to place the ‘science-deniers’ into a real-life gulag. These ‘science-deniers,’ me included, and their questions will be discarded, silenced, imprisoned, and ultimately murdered in the name of building and maintaining the UN-backed global hive mind.

“17.7 Promote the development, transfer, dissemination and diffusion of environmentally sound technologies to developing countries on favourable terms, including on concessional and preferential terms, as mutually agreed[.]”

According to the UN, in 2020 China exported $258.66 billion in ‘environmentally sound technologies.’ Germany exported $162.94 billion while the United States exported $113.83 billion in 2020. These three nations account for almost 46% of the 1.165 trillion of exported ‘environmentally sound technologies’ worldwide.

To the UN, it’s not good enough for the starving to grow food for themselves because it won’t be done sustainably, getting water to the thirsty won’t be done because the projects aren’t environmentally friendly enough, ridding disease-riddled areas of the vectors of certain diseases through practical and effective means can’t be done because the potential environmental impact statements indicate potential hazards to the ecosystem. If you still think the UN is benevolent, Greenpeace cares about people, or that multinational corporations like Walmart, Shell, or Black Rock are responsibly using the billions (or trillions) of dollars given to them by those of us targeted for extermination, then go read the first sentence in this paragraph again.

The UN adds in that when these types of investments are made in developing countries, the investment will not be profitable. The UN is actually telling investors to expect to just have to write these investments off or take losses on them. That’s Marxism. It’s not benevolence, it’s not charity, its Marxism fused with virtue signaling.

“17.8 Fully operationalize the technology bank and science, technology and innovation capacity-building mechanism for least developed countries by 2017 and enhance the use of enabling technology, in particular information and communications technology[.]”

Charting the number of people who have used the internet in the last 3 months is how the UN has chosen to track this goal. I wrote about this exact graph in target 17.6. In 2017 UN designated Least Developed Countries had an internet access rate of 17.46%.

What the UN is really referring to in this target is a United Nations document titled A/71/363 or Charter of the Technology Bank for Least Developed Countries and the entities like the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). The first document creates a bureau within the United Nations, located in Turkey, designed to allow ‘sustainable’ technology to flow into the least developed nations. It creates a council which grants permanent observer status to UN Council on Trade and Development, the UNDP Administrator, UNSECO Director-General, The World Bank’s President, and the Director-General World Intellectual Property Organization. With the manager’s approval, the council can also invite anyone else it wishes, including NGO’s. Pretty much anyone can donate to this UN bureaucracy. And the members of this bureaucracy are given diplomatic immunity’s per UN Articles 104 and 105. The Technology Bank is one of the scientific-inequality-drum-pounding entities seeking to stab as many people as possible in LDCs in an effort to murder and mangle those populations with mRNA ‘technology’ as well.

DESA, meanwhile, writes reports which suggest how to better implement Agenda 21 and the SDG’s faster through financing and policy implementation in regard to science, technology, and innovation. Their 2019 report mentions LDC’s eight times and the efforts the likes of UNESCO have made to increase internet and broadband access in order to access research papers, scientific data, and their push to increase the number of people, especially researchers and scientists, in least developed countries which have been exposed to the ideas of artificial intelligence. This will not help their people eat, not get access to clean water, but it will allow the building of algorithms which may help. Or, the AI developed in LDCs may be used to figure out how to best murder their rivals. Time will tell, but my bet would be on the latter being as though the UN isn’t interested in helping those most in need meet those needs. The UN is interested in transcending the limitations of humanity for their own benefit, destroying any notion of objective truth, and murdering people and blaming all of it on, primarily, the United States.

“17.9 Enhance international support for implementing effective and targeted capacity-building in developing countries to support national plans to implement all the sustainable development goals, including through North-South, South-South and triangular cooperation[.]”

$170.97 billion was meted out in concessional loans and grants in 2019 to implement sustainable development goals around the globe. Nations in Africa, Asia Minor, and Southeast Asia received most of these funds, while several nations in South America received a substantial portion as well. Syria topped the list with $10.4 billion, followed by Ethiopia with $4.89 billion, and Bangladesh with $4.5 billion. 12 other nations received over $2 billion in 2019. The poorest nation on earth, Burundi, received $650 million in 2019.

Every country on earth should be rejecting this; however, hundreds of millions, if not tens of billions, of dollars a year to implement this UN garbage is like a moth drawing near to a flame. Sure the wings of these moth-nations will get burn up, but until their wings actually burn off, that money sure will make their UN-pledged governments feel financially safe. I wonder how much these UN-backed regimes spend each year on security for themselves creating legislation and policy dictating their subjects to adhere to UN directives.

“17.10 Promote a universal, rules-based, open, non-discriminatory and equitable multilateral trading system under the World Trade Organization, including through the conclusion of negotiations under its Doha Development Agenda[.]”

The UN measures tariff rates to see if they are achieving their target. In 1988 the global average on tariffs was 4.79% and in 2017 the rate was 2.59%. Overall, the UN is getting closer to its utopia of free-trade by these statistics. Of course, there are outliers which are distorting the UN’s utopian aims such as Palau and Bermuda with 2019 tariff rates of over 100% (118.21% and 103.17%, respectively). Three other nations have tariff rates of over 20%. 39 nations had rates over 10% or higher, including the United States. In 2015 China had a 4.52% tariff and the US measured 1.69%. In 2018 China registered 3.39% and the US 1.59%. In 2019, after about 50 years of China, and other nations, destroying US domestic production capacity, the US jumped to 13.78% while China measured 2.53%.

Tariffs are used by nations to protect the businesses in their nations. Tariffs should be used to remove the differences in labor costs between nations. There are few textile mills in the United States because those jobs come with a minimum wage and benefits but sweatshop owners in Southeast Asia have no problem paying their workers $3 a day, and I am being generous with that amount. There should be no trade between a capitalist nation and a Marxist nation because those systems are incompatible with one another. Finally, all nations need to be as close to self-sustaining as possible in order to provide for their citizen’s well-being and the national defense in times of trouble and/or war. In a world without tariffs, all of this disappears and it is truly a race to the lowest prices, and the lowest wages possible. Of course the UN promotes this, it means austerity in developed nations, mediocrity in most developed nations, and a boom for those worst off.

But let’s break down what the UN is really saying in this target, because it is important. Universal means everything within the system, that means ever single nation and every single person within that nation. Rules-based systems rely on the benevolence of the rulers who lay down the rules and upon the rule-makers henchmen who enforce those rules. Open means can mean there are no rules, or it could mean there are no rules which are hidden, or it could mean that trade routes are accessible. Non-discriminatory means that workers in sweatshops making $3 a day are able to freely transport their goods to a nation with a minimum wage of $7.50 an hour. And equitable always means that the results of outcomes are the same.

The rule makers are the World Trade Organization, which the US, and every other nation on earth, should immediately withdraw from. Their explanation of what they do is to seek is:

“The WTO's founding and guiding principles remain the pursuit of open borders, the guarantee of most-favoured-nation principle and non-discriminatory treatment by and among members, and a commitment to transparency in the conduct of its activities. The opening of national markets to international trade, with justifiable exceptions or with adequate flexibilities, will encourage and contribute to sustainable development, raise people's welfare, reduce poverty, and foster peace and stability. At the same time, such market opening must be accompanied by sound domestic and international policies that contribute to economic growth and development according to each member's needs and aspirations.”

The WTO is seeking, and always has sought, a world that looks very similar to the Hunger Games movies. Of course, the Hunger Games could never actually occur under this regime because one of the winners may just decide to start feeding the people, violating the WTO’s mandate of inflicting trade demands upon every person in every sector (nation), and mass-murdering those who disobey their decrees.

The Doha Development Agenda is an ongoing negotiation which started in 2001. The main issues were, and still are, able to be summed up as:

“The negotiations have been characterized by persistent differences among the United States, the European Union, and developing countries on major issues, such as agriculture, industrial tariffs and non-tariff barriers, services, and trade remedies. Partly as a result of being labeled a development round to entice developing countries to participate in the first place, developing countries (including emerging economic powerhouses such as China, Brazil, and India) have sought the reduction of agriculture tariffs and subsidies among developed countries, non-reciprocal market access for manufacturing sectors, and protection for their services industries. The United States, the European Union, and other developed countries have sought increased access to developing countries' industrial and services sectors while attempting to retain some measure of protection for their agricultural sectors. Given the differences, there is frustration over the ability of WTO member states to reach a comprehensive agreement.”

Developing nations demanded that the developed nations suffer under a tyranny of the developing nation’s majority. Developed nations at least had the common sense to demand they retain their economic viability in growing food, despite their inability to demand any retention of their manufacturing and service sectors. Until the WTO meets all of the goals it has set out to accomplish, including free-trade, these negotiations will not cease.

The next round of these ongoing negotiations will take place in June 2022. The only thing that would happen in a rational world is a complete defunding and withdraw by every member of the WTO. What will happen, in the world in which we actually live, is more nations capitulating to the developing nations’ tyrannical demands.

“17.11 Significantly increase the exports of developing countries, in particular with a view to doubling the least developed countries’ share of global exports by 2020[.]”

The UN desires a world flooded by goods made by workers starving to death. According to the data in the table the UN uses to track this, the worldwide increase in exports was 4% between 2015 and 2020. Between 2000 and 2015 those same nations increased their exports by 84%. Between 1960 and 2000 exports increased 414% from those nations. Least Developed Countries, of those which reported, increased their exports by 12% between 2015 and 2020 and 289% between 2000 and 2015. Between 2000 and 2020, the rate rose 348%. The UN failed in their desire to destroy developed nations through trade by 2020. They also failed to raise trade exports between 2015 and 2020 in any significant way from least developed nations.

“17.12 Realize timely implementation of duty-free and quota-free market access on a lasting basis for all least developed countries, consistent with World Trade Organization decisions, including by ensuring that preferential rules of origin applicable to imports from least developed countries are transparent and simple, and contribute to facilitating market access[.]”

In 2017, all products entering a low-income country had an average tariff of 9.69%. The 2017 number is actually a reduction of 34% from 1988. The chart used by the UN; however, is not responsive to the target, and individual countries are primarily listed. Some countries did better than others over time. The poorest nation on earth reduced tariffs on imported products to 8.52% in 2019, while manufactured goods were still at 6.09% (a 64% reduction from 2002), tariffs on imported primary products rose 129% to 17.28%. Hong Kong and Macao registered 0.0% tariffs for imported goods.

Earlier I mentioned Palau and Bermuda with tariff rates over 100%. The primary products imported into these nations carried tariffs of 350.15% and 312.08%, respectively, and imported manufactured goods had tariffs of 4.4% and 19.35%, respectively. In 2018 Palau’s primary export accounted for 85% of all of their export, which was “[f]ish, fresh or chilled, excluding fish fillets and other fish meat of heading 03.04,” followed by “[o]ther aircraft (for example, helicopters, aeroplanes); spacecraft (including satellites) and suborbital and spacecraft launch vehicles,” which accounted for 4.63% of exports. Palau has a $3.00 an hour minimum wage, and, according to salary explorer, the average salary (in USD) for an aquaculture and seafood farmer (fisherman) is $1,290. Palau seems to want to protect their primary export from competition with other nations. Nations such as China (average fishing salary of $2,308), Japan ($2,079 average for a fisherman), and Australia (average salary of $34,687) will find their products far more expensive and less competitive in Palau fish markets than in their own. They imported oil, cars, malt beer, water, frozen meat, wood products, medicaments, and rice, a total of of 35.22% of all imports, in 2018. But all of that is okay, because that’s the way UN wants it – they want richer countries to face stiff tariffs in places like Palau while accepting anything Palau throws at them, tariff-free.

Bermuda’s primary exports, together accounting for 77.8% of all exports, were musical instruments (48.3%), beverages, spirits, and vinegar (15%), vehicles (8.3%), and optical, technical, and medical apparatuses (6.2%). 94.6% of Bermuda’s trade was destined for one of four countries; the US 78.3% of the time, Denmark 7%, Canada 5.3%, and the UK 4%. 47% of Bermuda’s imports were of passenger and cargo ships in 2018. So, while these four nations, all of them developed nations, are supposed to accept Bermuda’s instruments and liquor free of tariffs, Bermuda is just fine imposing massive tariffs on these nations for primary imports.

It’s not about free trade, it is about making one nation more equal than any other nation. It is about replacing domestic jobs and goods in developed nations with goods imported from other, more deserving nations. The WTO has decided more jobs are needed and more goods need to be exported out of poorer nations; however, there is only so much nations can consume and it is indeed a zero-sum game. The products which poor nations produce cannot compete in the open market unless those products are produced for a multinational corporation with already established products. I’m certainly never going to start buying Mexican water, nor baby formula made in Burundi, not am I going on the hunt for any steel product created in Niger, Chad, or China. Again, the UN wants at least 90% of humanity to cease to exist, so, economically, they are using trade, along with their buddies at the WTO, to make everyone in the world race to the bottom.

“17.13 Enhance global macroeconomic stability, including through policy coordination and policy coherence[.]”

I am not an economics master, however, even I can state some facts about macroeconomic stability. One way to destroy global macroeconomic stability is to repeat the 2008-2009 housing bubble crisis on a global scale by inflating a balloon of derivatives at the international level well into the quadrillions of dollars and have entire nations signed on as the backing. Another way to do this is to tell all businesses whether or not they qualify as essential and shut down the ones which don’t qualify. Another way to do this would be to have China’s remimbi, or the Euro, or a World Bank basket of currencies, or, if the monsters that control this earth really want to wreck stability beyond all repair, the IMF could offer a Special Drawing Right (SDR) as a replacement of the US dollar as the global reserve currency. Runaway inflation around the world is not an oops moment, it is a sign that things are collapsing, globally. This collapse was orchestrated and planned – it is not a symptom, it is a feature of the world being created by utopian monsters, including those at the UN, who see no reason to have 90% of the world’s population remain upon the planet.

One table the UN uses to track this target shows inflation rates up to 2020. Zimbabwe enjoyed an inflation rate of 557.2% in 2020, and runner-up Sudan achieved a 150.32% rate. Eight other countries tallied inflation rates over 10% in 2020. Those numbers today are severely worse across the world.

Consumer price index – how much the same goods cost over time – show that in the US, energy costs have risen 30.3%, food has risen by 9.4%, and in particular meat has risen 14.8%, fuel oils have risen 80.5%, gasoline has risen 43.6%, electricity 11%, natural gas 22.7%, and cereals 10.3% over the course of the last 12 months. All items rose by 8.3%. In the last 30 days, all items increase 0.3%. This is another indicator of global macroeconomic stability being destroyed by monsters, on purpose.

Another UN graph shows public debt as a share of GDP. Greece is at 212%, while, in descending order, Italy, Cyprus, Portugal, United States, Spain, and United Kingdom fall between 150.9% and 108.85%. If our business or household looked like these budgetary nightmares, we would declare bankruptcy and figure out how to do things better. These nations aren’t going to stop spending money on nonsense like $40 billion to Ukraine so I guess we will watch them embrace a policy called MMT where it doesn’t matter what the debt is – the taxpayers can pay the debts being incurred now at a later time. Nevermind the austerity and subjugation which awaits you in your old age, and your children’s middle age, and your grandchildren’s youth. Huge public debts will eventually lead to something called a default and force majure will come into play.

Finally the UN looks at merchandise trade as a share of GDP to track the target. The trade referenced here is total merchandise imports added to merchandise exports and divided by GDP. Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam, Djibouti, Slovenia, Slovakia, Belgium, American Samoa, UAE, and Hungary all had over 150% in 2020. Cuba, Guam, Bermuda, Ethiopia, and United States all had under 20%. Those nations with higher numbers are more open to trade according to the economists who devised this metric.

These guys had their policies in lockstep over COVID-19 mitigation efforts. While some nations did not virtue signal their subservience to the international community as much as the monsters at the WHO, NIAID, CDC, and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation would have liked (they are working on better adherence), most did. The world got to see, especially in ‘free’ societies like Canada, Australia, and the UK, people being arrested for speaking out, going to the beach alone, or trying to work out. People were isolated from loved ones. It became a criminal act to give a hug or refusing to wear a mask. Businesses shut down, curtailed their hours, and turned their employees into mask Nazi’s. Experts are still demanding we all go get experimental shots which sterilize, maim, and murder the recipients. These same experts encouraged us to kill our dogs and cats.

If you thought COVID-19 mitigation efforts were problematic, wait until we all witness a global economic policy coherence and coordination effort with the goal being global macroeconomic stability. They will have every human living in a global technocratic dictatorship. Then essential and non-essential designations won’t mean you can work, you stay home, it will mean you live or die. The guillotines are armed and the baskets ready – the incinerators are blazing – it’s only a matter of time before the beast system realizes a global currency. This target, and all it actually portends, is how the world gets to a one world government.

“17.14 Enhance policy coherence for sustainable development[.]”

Not a whole lot of nations have reported about this target. Of the nations which did report, Qatar has a 100% compliance rate with the eight compiled metrics for this target: “1) Institutionalisation of political commitment 2) Long-term considerations in decision-making 3) Inter-ministerial and cross-sectoral coordination 4) Participatory processes 5) Policy linkages 6) Alignment across
government levels 7) Monitoring and reporting for policy coherence 8) Financing for policy
coherence.” In other words, Qatar is completely captured by the UN’s version of sustainable development. Other nations which score well on this target are Lithuania, Palestine (which is not a nation and never should be), Pakistan, Costa Rica, and Poland, all of which have 90% or greater compliance.

The end goal of this target is the same as the end goal of the prior target. Instead of trying to initiate a global currency, however, this is seeking to mass-murder humanity through brainwashing efforts. It is far easier to get people to accept their devalued and precarious situation if they are led to believe it is for the greater good. Those people will be murdered; however, those on the front lines of this will be silenced through gulag or murder first. For instance, I reject the United Nations, everything they do, and their desires of sustainable development wholeheartedly. For that, an unrepentable sin, I will be silenced completely, sooner or later, through imprisonment or death.

“17.15 Respect each country’s policy space and leadership to establish and implement policies for poverty eradication and sustainable development Multi-stakeholder partnerships[.]”

“The indicator assesses the degree to which providers of development cooperation (i.e.
development partners) design their interventions by relying on objectives and results indicators that are drawn from developing country government-led results frameworks reflecting the country’s development priorities and goals.”

The language is pretty dense; however, to my understanding this is saying that the development partners (providers) use what the country’s goals are as their guide while doing their work. In the world, providers followed country owned frameworks 57.09% of the time, providers followed country-led frameworks 51.5% of the time, and providers followed government sources 43.76% of the time. I’d say that isn’t very respectful of the providers running around and basically doing whatever they want as long as it is UN-approved. Providers were much more ‘respectful’ in nations that would just as soon prosecute or butcher the providers if they strayed from the government’s direction. Providers in China, for instance, followed their directions 100% of the time when it came to county-led frameworks and government sources and 83.33% of the time when it came to government owned frameworks. In the US, providers followed government owned frameworks 43.95% of the time, country-led frameworks 29.57% of the time, and followed government sources 24.36% of the time.

There is a real hatred of the United States’ Constitution and Declaration of Independence around the world, especially by the ‘elites’ of the world as well as international organizations. If nothing else, the sentiment comes through in the UN’s tracking statistics very clearly. We came in 7th, 5th, and 5th from the bottom. We give the UN tens of billions of dollars annually while they crap all over US laws – what are we paying for and why do we keep doing it?

“17.16 Enhance the global partnership for sustainable development, complemented by multi-stakeholder partnerships that mobilize and share knowledge, expertise, technology and financial resources, to support the achievement of the sustainable development goals in all countries, in particular developing countries[.]”

Progress in multistakeholder development is measured by two graphs. It’s important to note that stakeholders are not shareholders. Investopedia.com provides a definition of stakeholder:

“A stakeholder is a party that has an interest in a company and can either affect or be affected by the business. The primary stakeholders in a typical corporation are its investors, employees, customers, and suppliers.

“However, with the increasing attention on corporate social responsibility, the concept has been extended to include communities, governments, and trade associations.”

Do you have individual power when pitted against your entire community, your government, or a trade association? Not a whole lot of power in comparison, which is why the UN is constantly seeking stakeholders. Even better for the UN agenda is to get a bunch of woke UN-loving NGO’s, businesses, and government agencies together to drown out the half-dozen dissenting voices against their plans. All the UN is doing by using stakeholders, especially when they create multistakeholder situations is to destroy individual rights. The UN wants collective rights, ie., they want Marxism except they see only themselves as the proletariat and actually are the bourgeoisie.

20 nations, Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Finland, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Kuwait, Mexico, Norway, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, and United Arab Emirates have reported, “progress in multi-stakeholder development effectiveness monitoring frameworks that support the achievement of the sustainable development goals.” Every single one of these nations have failed their citizens by giving their sovereignty – ALL of their sovereignty – to the UN. 36 nations report having received development coordination from the 20 nations listed above. These 36 nations have allowed their own sovereign claims to be weakened, if not erased; however, the receiving nations are mostly European borders drawn around areas they deemed fit when the decolonized Africa. Those nations in particular have, and always will have, problems maintaining their borders and their sovereignty because of the demography of their nation. Receiving nations, both inside and outside of Africa, have succumbed to the UN’s sustainable development agenda because of money and investment. None of these 56 nations seem to be able to grasp what sovereignty actually is, nor that the UN, WTO, WHO, WEF and several other international monsters are actually going to dictate their nation’s direction from now on.

“17.17 Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships Data, monitoring and accountability[.]”

Under Marxism, there is the Communist and the Fascist. They are both Marxist. This target is telling the world the UN’s desire to empower their favorite multinational businesses through public-private partnerships. That is fascism. In addition to multinational businesses in-line with UN objectives are the governments who are likewise directed and the civil society collectives which have been deluded into believing the UN’s Satanically-inspired grand delusion. The more individuals they can get to buy into the lie, the easier it will be to peer pressure those not in line with the lie. Of course, peer pressure can only occur if peers of different beliefs get together. Many of us live in echo chambers without hearing the other side, however, this is dangerous as well because no one will ever change their minds, nor learn anything, without encountering new ideas. Basically, the UN has created a massive echo chamber comprised of public, public-private, and civil society partnerships. The UN then deemed themselves and any entity emanating from any of these three types of conglomerations as experts in order to demand compliance from each and every individual on the planet. And then they call upon ‘science’ to stifle dissent, despite the fact that all of science is asking disagreeable questions.

The UN has chosen to track the amount of money spent by public-private partnerships on infrastructure. Keep in mind that all of these ‘partnerships’ are fascist – so if you claim to be one of those idiotic anti-fascist you should be concerned (and also be aware that you are most likely a Communist). Between 2000 and 2020 China dropped over $221 billion into fascist projects. Over the same time period Brazil dumped over $326 billion into these types of fascist partnerships. In 2020 alone, Brazil spent over $7.7 billion, China spent over $62 billion, India spent over $5.2 billion, Mexico spent over $4.2 billion, and Bangladesh spent over 2.9 billion. Between 2015 and 2020 Romania increased their fascist expenditures 825%, Bangladesh by 811%, Nigeria by 165%, and Pakistan by 105%.

The UN must be very pleased because their favored businesses are the entities receiving the revenues from these government expenditures. There will be even less businesses than there are countries at the end of all of the consolidation which will rapidly occur under a global financial collapse. Human control mechanisms will be off the chart through UN policies and the surveillance and enforcement powers of their favored businesses.

“17.18 By 2020, enhance capacity-building support to developing countries, including for least developed countries and small island developing States, to increase significantly the availability of high-quality, timely and reliable data disaggregated by income, gender, age, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic location and other characteristics relevant in national contexts[.]”

How relevant is this target in a nation like Tuvalu with 96% of their nation made up of Polynesian ethnicity, and a population under 15,000 people. Maybe the population of Tuvalu can demand climate reparations because they have access to this data – outside of that, I cannot think of any other reasons why this type of data would be relevant to the nation. Well I can think of one reason. Maybe Tuvalu will build a 300-foot-high sea wall around all ten square miles the islands which make up its land mass and demand development assistance for the construction.

There are three indicators for this target. The first indicator is described as: “[t]his indicator is measured using the Statistical Capacity Indicator which provides an overview of the capacity of a country's national statistical system based on a diagnostic framework thereby assessing three dimensions: Methodology, Source Data, and Periodicity and Timeliness.” This represents a standardization of the data countries report to the relevant international bodies. The UN should probably take a cue from this and become much more regular and timely in their own reporting.

The second indicator measures whether or not a country has statistical legislation in line with Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics. FPOS is something the UN actually adopted in order to compel their members to report relevant statistics about their nation. This, as trivial as it seems, creates a breach of sovereignty. 136 countries have agreed to and follow the UN’s statistical guidelines by law, including the United States, Japan, China, Russia, France, Germany, and the UK.

The third indicator measures national statistical plans which are fully funded and under implementation. 132 nations have plans under implementation, 103 nations have their governments funding them at least partially, 84 nations are fully funded, 23 nations received donations from donors, and 15 nations received other funding. It’s not enough to do an end around laws the UN disagrees with, here they state their intentions to make sure that the UN is adhered to whether or not laws which support UN goals are in place.

“17.19 By 2030, build on existing initiatives to develop measurements of progress on sustainable development that complement gross domestic product, and support statistical capacity-building in developing countries[.]”

While tracking this goal, the UN seems to have forgotten that they included GDP complimenting measurements because they do nothing to track that portion of this target at all. What they do track is the resources made available for developing statistical capacity in developing countries. In 2018 $421,009,487 was given out under this metric. Argentina grabbed $50 million, Nigeria got $40 million and Pakistan netted $35 million. The UN is nothing without welfare.

The other thing the UN tracks to see if this target is living up to UN standards is the “proportion of countries that (a) have conducted at least one population and housing census in the last 10 years; and (b) have achieved 100 per cent birth registration and 80 per cent death registration.” There had been no census conducted in 15 nations between 2007 and 2017. 49 nations had 100% of their population registered with birth certificates as of 2019. 55 nations had less than 80% of the deaths in their lands recorded by death certificates.

Most of the nations which did not report satisfactorily to these three metrics are developing nations. But keep in mind that in order for the UN to destroy groups of people either through enslavement or through extermination, it is important for them to know how many people there are, how many have already been eliminated, and how best to get rid of the remainder. In order to do that, the UN would have to start demanding more complete and accurate records about such matters from the areas not providing reliable data which is exactly what they are doing here.

Summary

The partnerships the UN is seeking to build creates a global fascist technocratic system of world governance which will result in open air prisons being built through a variety of surveillance sources which will leave no one behind. Everyone is apt to be forced to succumb to this tyranny labeled sustainable development. This goal manifests the UN’s Marxist intentions, their outlook on facilitating and maintaining a perpetual global welfare system, their intention to create a world government through regulatory capture, and throughout their rambling show a clear pattern of not really caring who’s toes they need to step on to get their way.

The way to fight back is to say no to sustainable development. Explain why you are saying no to it. Stop allowing the UN to infiltrate local governments getting advice from UN-sponsored NGO’s and partnering companies which are drafted as legislation. We don’t need 5-year plans. We need responsible and accountable leadership. And we need to return our focus on the Word and fight against those who reject objective truth.

Open a Bible and read it. May God Bless You.

All quotes were found at https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal17 unless otherwise documented.