How are the UN Sustainability Goals Going? Goal 16 of 17.
Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity
5/26/2022
The seventeen United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the goals of the Great Reset. The SDGs were adopted in 2015 by United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The cover for the SDGs were that they would provide relief for disabled peoples by 2030 according to Agenda 2030. To fully understand Agenda 2030, a review of Agenda 21 should be undertaken, which I will not do here. In this article I will focus on the 16th SDG:
Promote just, peaceful and inclusive societies
The UN has really bizarre definitions of justice, peace, and inclusive. While the definitions of these terms themselves are somewhat in line with their traditional meanings, their application and intended outcomes is to enhance their control. They seek to enhance this control by creating divisions within societies casting one group as a victim class and the other as the oppressor class. Rights, protections, and monetary awards go to the prior group while the latter group is demonized, threatened with prison, and monetarily sanctioned. It’s a great way to fracture societies from within and can (and has) lead to brutal civil wars. The 12 targets of goal 16 are:
“16.1 Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere
“16.2 End abuse, exploitation, trafficking and all forms of violence against and torture of children
“16.3 Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all
“16.4 By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime
“16.5 Substantially reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms
16.6 Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels
“16.7 Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels
“16.8 Broaden and strengthen the participation of developing countries in the institutions of global governance
“16.9 By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration
“16.10 Ensure public access to information and protect fundamental freedoms, in accordance with national legislation and international agreements
“16.a Strengthen relevant national institutions, including through international cooperation, for building capacity at all levels, in particular in developing countries, to prevent violence and combat terrorism and crime
“16.b Promote and enforce non-discriminatory laws and policies for sustainable development”
I’m going to cover these one by one.
“16.1 Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related death rates everywhere[.]”
COVID-19 mitigation efforts proved the UN ineffective at reducing violence in the traditional sense. The UN’s endorsement-by-silence of bioweapons labs in Ukraine and their failure to effectively uphold treaties signed by Russia and the West to provide a buffer zone between Russia and NATO is another major failure which has resulted in actual war. The Ukraine/Russia conflict has a good possibility to escalate into a full scale world war featuring nuclear capabilities.
There are four different indicators for this target. The first one tracks intentional homicides up to 2018. Before the SDG’s were adopted (2015), the global intentional homicide rate went down between 2012 and 2015, from 6.2 to 5.3 people per 100,000 people. In 2018 the nation titled murder capital of the world was in El Salvador with 52.02 per 100,000 which is better than in 2015 when it was at 105.23. Jamaican’s suffered 43.85 intentional homicides per 100,000 people in 2018, which is an increase from 2015. Glancing at the map based off of the data, Central America, South America, and the several African nations which reported were a mess in 2018.
Human Rights Watch describes El Salvador as:
“Since taking office, President Nayib Bukele has undermined basic democratic checks and balances. In February 2020, he entered the Legislative Assembly with armed soldiers in an apparent effort to intimidate legislators into approving a loan for security forces. He has publicly defied three rulings by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court prohibiting arrests for violations of a Covid-19-related lockdown Bukele had decreed.
“In March, Bukele decreed a nationwide, mandatory lockdown in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, and ordered security forces to detain people breaking it. Thousands have since been detained in overcrowded and unsanitary centers called “containment centers.”
“Gangs exercise territorial control over neighborhoods and extort residents throughout the country. They forcibly recruit children and sexually abuse women, girls, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. Gangs kill, disappear, rape, or displace those who resist.
“Historically, security forces have committed extrajudicial executions, sexual assaults, enforced disappearances, and torture. They remain largely ineffective in protecting the population from gang violence.”
El Salvador’s murder rate was reduced due to the COVID-19 lock downs which were imposed upon the nation. The WHO celebrated the illegal medical martial law measures imposed in El Salvador. While the Bukele is credited with reducing gang violence, he did this, according to Human Rights Watch by making deals with MS-13 to give their imprisoned members privileges within the prisons while those who remain free reduce their violent actions and vote for him. Can you say corruption? I highlighted El Salvador because of MS-13 and because they have had such a persistently high rate of murder within their country. The problem is that MS-13 likes to export it’s gang members, illegally of course, and now the US is plagued by these animals hunting people down within our borders.
Statistia.com has not lost their ability to gather data and calculate national homicide rates since 2018 and reported that in 2020 and 2021 the homicide rate in Jamaica was at 46.5 and 49.4 per 100,000 people, respectively. Jamaica declared itself a disaster area in March 2020, when they had eight COVID-19 cases, and gave themselves the ability, according to a twitter post: “Attorney General @MalahooForteQC says with the declaration of Jamaica as a disaster area, officials can enter premises without warrants. Says it is important for compliance with orders. Warns against generating fake news as there will be prosecution for public mischief. #COVID-19” In Jamaica, a person speaking their mind will get them locked up in prison and no warrants were needed for authorities to do whatever they wanted to do. I’m disgusted by the scamdemic response in Jamaica, and, more in line with the topic at hand; homicide rates actually rose despite the Jamaican governments disgusting decrees to mitigate COVID-19 infections, which included a nationwide curfew of 9pm until 5am and a once-per-day permission for those over 65 to leave their homes to carry out “essential” tasks.
Homicide is driven by evil. A lot of it is driven by greed, jealousy, a perceived retribution for wrongs, and lust. Read the Bible and stop being evil. Those who are evil and refuse this should be in prison forever, or dealt with according to God’s law. El Salvador is creating an absolute monster with MS-13 which will blow up in their face with an gigantic explosion of homicides, and Jamaica has done nothing to address their homicide issues. At the core of these two nations, there is a definite evil and that evil is not being addressed in either one. And the UN will not address it either because at their own core, they are evil as well.
The second indicator addresses conflict-related deaths, which includes war, conflicts, and terrorism. Afghanistan, Yemen, and Syria all suffered over 42 dead per 100,000 people from these causes in 2019. Libya, in 2016, was ‘liberated’ by a State Department run by an absolutely disgusting monster named Hillary Clinton and in 2019 recorded 15.42 conflict-related deaths per 100,000 people. Afghanistan was still occupied by the United States in 2019. Yemen has been in a civil war for over a decade between Sunni and Shi’ite Moslems which are backed by outside states, notably, Saudi Arabia and Iran, respectively. Syria has also been engaged in a civil war for over a decade, as well as having been a base for rebel groups fighting against US-forces in Iraq, and having ISIS take positions within the nation.
Between 2015 and 2020, civilians who were killed because of conflict decreased from 32,428 to 11,009, respectively. This decrease is not attributable to a lack of conflict zones, it is a reflection of better targeting systems and less shelling of residential areas to get rid of the terrorists hiding within those buildings.
The third indicator tracks the prevalence of all violence. The first of these tracking mechanisms shows the gender bias inherent in the UN’s claims of being inclusive in that they only wish to track assaults on women perpetrated by men. Not only is their metric sexist, it includes physical, psychological, and sexual violence which makes these metrics extremely unreliable because psychological violence is highly subjective, but I digress. Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Uganda all reported over 30% of women aged 15 and older who have experienced violence. There are 33 nations which reported between 20% and 30% of their 15 years-old and over females who have reported violence.
Another graph shows statistics broken down by sex in seven nations – El Salvador, Finland, Sweden, Australia, England and Wales, France, Colombia, and Chile. Overall, those nations reporting had a far higher rate of males being the victims of violence. Two nations, Finland and Australia, had slightly higher rates of females being victims of violence.
As far as sexual violence goes between males and females, only five nations reported both sexes in 2018. Sweden, New Zealand, England and Wales, Finland, and Australia reported that women are overwhelmingly the victims of sexual assault; however, men experiencing sexual abuse also represent about 1% of the populations in those nations. Sweden reported that in 2018 over 10% of their females had been victims of sexual assault. In 2015 it was 3.4%. The reason for this is 100% attributable to the imported rape gangs the EU demanded Sweden take within its borders from among the ‘refugees’ which illegally entered into Europe. If Sweden had anyone with a set of testicles, they would remove the criminal elements from the refugee areas, offer death as the result of rape convictions, and immediately cease taking any of these people into their nation. Instead they pan on illegally joining NATO. Hey, Sweden, enjoy being the rape capital of Europe forever!
The final indicator of the first target looks at public safety. Sweden reported 72% of the people feeling safe walking alone near where they live. The United States reported 69% in 2017, 79% in Germany in 2017, 84% in Israel in 2018, and 17% in Bolivia in 2015. In 2018 South Africa reported 35%, while Qatar reported 100%.
It is important to note that the UN has its own security forces. Their mission is, “Security for the UN, for a better world.” Public safety to the UN only extends to the UN according to this mission statement. The UN really does not care about the public, only themselves, but will jump at any chance to install themselves anywhere they are able to in order to make a claim to promote public safety.
“16.2 End abuse, exploitation, trafficking and all forms of violence against and torture of children[.]”
The United Nations is playing fast and loose with the facts here. There is a border in the United States which sees million cross it, including children, illegally. The UN won’t talk about it and actually encourages people to undergo the trek. The same is true for so-called refugees coming out of northern Africa destined for Europe. When the coyotes have mom and dad murdered or kidnap a child they take the child and use them as their easy ticket into the destination. If something happens to one of these orphaned or abducted children, the complete scum-bag demons like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez climb up on their soap boxes and demand more for the criminals committing felonies – never to shut the border down or even to enforce the law. The EU operates the same way.
But here’s the UN, talking about preventing violence against children in the first indicator for this target. The graph tracks the statistics of the “[p]roportion of children aged 1-14 years who experienced physical punishment and/or psychological aggression by caregivers in last month (% of children aged 1-14 years)[.]” It seems as though giving a spanking would qualify as an event which would be picked up by this metric. A sharp retort promising that spanking from caregiver to child could conceivably be picked-up by this graph. Basically the UN is telling parents that they can no longer discipline their children.
I absolutely abhor child abuse in all of it’s forms; however, giving a spanking with a bare open hand several times or forcefully demanding a child go into timeout isn’t abuse. There is a line when discipline turns into abuse. In those cases, the parents need to be monitored. But where that line is, is very blurry. But the UN has set the bar at discipline in physical punishment of any sort or making a child feel bad about themselves to get them to stop certain behaviors.
The latest reported data for this indicator (ranging from 2014 – 2020) show Ghana, Egypt, Kiribati, Togo, Benin, Samoa, Palestine, and Central African Republic in descending order, ranging from 94% to 90%. Apparently it is still culturally acceptable to discipline a child in these, and many other nations which dis not rate in 90% or higher and ranged from 60% and higher.
Here the UN is, in the second indicator, with a graph which shows the US as the nation with the largest problem with trafficked people 18 years old and younger. Cote d’Ivoire actually had the largest problem with this per 100,000 in 2018 in the male category with 110, followed by the US with 73, followed by Nepal with 42 per 100,000. In the female category, France had 262 females per 100,000, Cote d’Ivoire had 54, and the US had 41.
For those trafficked who are over 18, the graph the UN uses shows the US as the nation of the biggest problem (it’s the population of the US). But, of reporting nations, the US does have the largest share of trafficked 18 years old and older per 100,000 in both males and females, 868 and 765, respectively. Other nations which have large proportions of males over 18 who were trafficked were Moldova (192), Italy (188), Thailand (177). Nations with high rates of trafficked females over 18 were France (635), Tunisia (156), and Nepal (115).
And in the third indicator the UN has four different graphs, all of them very incomplete, which are designed to display the prevalence of sexual assaults which occurred to those under 18. There have been 60 countries which have ever reported the incident of females between 18-29 years old who reported having been sexually assaulted prior to the age of 18. In 2017, Trinidad and Tobago that nearly a quarter of their females had been raped before turning 18. Grenada reported 13.7% in 2018, the Democratic Republic of Congo reported 13.4% in 2014, Rwanda reported 11.6% in 2020, and Ghana reported 10.3% in 2008. These are the latest numbers with values over 10% for the nations which reported. The UN is doing a piss-poor job of data-collection which, to me, shows that this issue really is a back-burner issue for the UN and really not all that important for them to monitor and try to convince legislatures and law enforcement to try to stop.
There have been 11 nations which have ever reported their male sexual assault victims who were raped before they turned 18. The highest rate reported was 3.5% in 2019 by Palestine.
40 nations have ever reported the number of women who were forced to have sex prior to their 18th birthday. From here on out I will use the term raped. The UN surveyed different nations from 2005-2016 to gain these statistics. What they found was Cameroon reported 16%, the Democratic Republic of Congo reported 13%, and Rwanda and Ghana each reported 10%.
7 countries reported male rapes occurring before the boy’s 18th birthday. Cameroon reported 4%, and Uganda and Kenya each reported 2%.
“16.3 Promote the rule of law at the national and international levels and ensure equal access to justice for all[.]”
Let’s define rule of law. Britannica writes:
“rule of law, the mechanism, process, institution, practice, or norm that supports the equality of all citizens before the law, secures a nonarbitrary form of government, and more generally prevents the arbitrary use of power. Arbitrariness is typical of various forms of despotism, absolutism, authoritarianism, and totalitarianism. Despotic governments include even highly institutionalized forms of rule in which the entity at the apex of the power structure (such as a king, a junta, or a party committee) is capable of acting without the constraint of law when it wishes to do so.”
There is no rule of law anywhere in the post 9-11 era. I would even go so far as to state there has been no rule of law in the US since 1913. I could make a case that the rule of law ceased to function even earlier than that in the United States, namely with Alexander Hamilton’s First Central Bank in 1791 and a Supreme Court ruling titled Marbury v. Madison (1803).
In the United States, in order to walk to an airline terminal, I must undergo a frisking or a millimeter wave body scan reminiscent of Total Recall. The TSA has been directed to arbitrarily confiscate whatever they want. The tracking of library books which were checked out and which books were bought by who was tracked by the FBI. The NSA began taking in all metadata from all communications (foreign and domestic) with options to record the entire content of the communication. What is the 4th Amendment if not one of the rules of law? Each of these operations seriously infringes upon the 4th Amendment.
The FBI ran a surveillance operation called COINTELPRO. After WWII there was Operation Paperclip. Edward Snowden came out against the PRISM program being ran by the NSA. All of these violate the rule of law.
The elephant in the room is COVID-19 and the mitigation efforts which came with it. Humanity was deemed non-essential whether you were able to keep working or not – you were deemed non-essential as well. We watched governors across the US tell businesses and churches to cease operations. National leaders in various countries ordered their entire country to stay home. Some welded apartment doors shut. The entire supply chain was disrupted, and, because the globalized world operated (and still does) on a just-in-time system, it is still disrupted and getting worse because of ludicrous actions by all world leaders. 30 million people starved to death because of the disruptions. Domestic violence rates soared around the world. Suicides, depression, and hopelessness gripped larger and larger segments of a variety of the segments of societies. Then the vaxxxsassination (thank you Steve Quayle for that term) came out as the savior. The jab alters DNA or outright kills people and does not protect against disease making it not a vaccine nor safe to take. Where was the rule of law when all of this arbitrary dictate was occurring? The rule of law disappeared and was replaced with edicts from US governors, the WHO, the CDC, the UN, certain US administrations, and various national leaders around the globe, all in the name of public health. God-given rights cannot be usurped by public health administrators and anyone that thinks they can be, I invite you to come and try to force Biden’s OSHA mandate upon me.
The UN doesn’t want to look at what the rule of law actually is. They have decided to track “proportion of victims of violence in the previous 12 months who reported their victimization to competent authorities”, “unsentenced detainees as a proportion of overall prison population”, and “proportion of the population who have experienced a dispute in the past two years and who accessed a formal or informal dispute resolution mechanism, by type of mechanism.”
The first indicator of the rule of law the UN tracks, from reporting nations, shows a big increase in robberies, a moderate decrease in sexual assaults, and a steady rate of physical assault.
The second indicator of the rule of law is dedicated to looking at unsentenced detainees and has worldwide data from 2005 to 2018. The worldwide rate rose from 30.7% to 30.8% between 2005 and 2018. Between 2015 and 2018 the rate jumped from 29.6% to 30.8%, which is even worse because 2015 is when these demonic SDG’s began.
The third indicator for the rule of law has no tracking but deals with dispute resolution. If I had to guess, I’d put the number at about a billion people who have sued other people or companies for harm. The UN’s goal; however, only cares about national governments and international levels. Why this is even an indicator is beyond me. Tracking every lawsuit in every nation may be possible, but the UN has, as of yet, not even tried. Tracking all lawsuits AND non-litigated (not even filed) grievances is impossible, but, if the UN really wanted to work miracles, they would just surveil the entire population of the earth to determine the rates of dispute resolutions (keep in mind, some disputes are thrown out, and some resolutions are not adequate to redress the loss). There is no way to track this indicator and even trying represents a serious breech of the rule of law, as defined by Britanica.com in the first place. What the UN is really doing with this SDG is attempting to create a rule of law which itself is tyrannical. There is no forgiveness of these type of attacks against humanity – they understand exaclty what they are attempting to do – do you understand it – the UN and their friends are counting on you not understanding their end run around the rule of law.
“16.4 By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime[.]”
The UN claims they cannot find a way to measure illicit financial flows. The reasons they cannot track them is a mixed bag of good and bad. The ‘good’ news is that all financial transactions are not able to be tracked, especially cash transfers. As long as cash exists (which I fear will be extinct in the very near future) a complete tracking of financial exchange will be impossible to complete. Even after cash, a barter system of items deemed rare and/or essential will be able to be traded for other goods deemed desirable. Gold, silver, diamonds, bullets, coffee, food, water will be traded for gas, food, bullets, gold, and silver. The black market cannot be gotten rid of unless all items of value to others are confiscated entirely from civilization. At that point, there will be chips in every right hand or every forehead and they will have bowed down to the Antichrist’s beast system by this time – otherwise they wouldn’t have the mark. Those not bowing down to the beast system will be hunted by it. Thus, those not bowing will need to hide and find a way to sustain themselves undetected, surrounded by those wishing nothing more than to gain notoriety by murdering those they found outside of the system. The movie the New World Order shows this very well.
The bad news is that cash is going to be banned and the only way ‘legitimate’ buying and selling will take place is through the beast’s mark. Look at all of the people who fell for the lies of the COVID-19 jabberscam. They just wanted to be able to go to the grocery store, back to work, and get back to normal, routine, hum-drum, life. They will be the first ones to take the mark when it does actually come out. Those who have locked-down have already been trained. The successive waves of pandemic responses including lock-downs (martial law, psychological warfare tactic), curfews (martial law, psychological warfare tactic), masks (medical tyranny, psychological warfare tactic), social distancing (medical tyranny, psychological warfare tactic), and dividing citizens between essential and non-essential (critical theory which is a Marxist derivation and also a psychological warfare tactic) and other efforts such as food rationing (psychological warfare tactic), and travel restrictions (psychological warfare tactic) will all be employed and obeyed completely by those who did it the first time around. The planner’s goals are to ensnare a larger and larger amount of the population into compliance and, ultimately into subservience, which is death in the end.
The other indicator looks at arms flows. I would like to make a point of noting that the United States, under Davos/ Bilderberg/UN control (Joe Biden’s regime which represents a coup as well as Obama’s third term), left billions of dollars worth of small and larger arms in Afghanistan and has sent billions of dollars worth of military hardware and even personnel into Ukraine – the UN said nothing about any of these transfers.
14 nations responded to the United Nations request for information which supported the UN’s desired metric, the “[p]roportion of seized, found or surrendered arms whose illicit origin or context has been traced or established by a competent authority in line with international instruments[.]” If I created an unregistered weapon that would be a form of an illicit source of weapons. As far as the context of small arms, that can mean absolutely anything the UN wants it to. Thus they have created a completely illegitimate instrument entitled the Arms Trade Treaty.
The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) seeks to database every gun and every gun owner in every nation. It restricts small arms being traded across borders. If you own a legitimate firearm, where do you think the entire NIC’s system was sent to – maybe the UN? Antiques are only relevant in this treaty if they were manufactured prior to 1900. Meanwhile Biden gave the Taliban billions in modern military weapons, and Ukraine billions in suicide drones as well as other modern weapons systems, including small arms. But if I drive into Canada, from the United States, with a firearm, holy cow, watch out…. The US signed this pile of garbage in an effort to circumvent the Constitution’s 2nd Amendment but it has never been ratified by Congress. Again, where is the rule of law?
Despite the US never having ratified this turd, the UN provisions in ATT are being carried out in the US with Biden going after ‘assault rifles’ against the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution. The UN is seeking the desirable position of themselves, and their government shills, owning the only effective means of self-defense. Once they achieve this the UN and the governments of those nations will bowl their people over with whatever edict they see fit. Speak ill of the ‘doctors’ who demand adherence to the idea of ‘take the shot and you’ll be okay and so will others’ – arrested. Sneak out of your house for a late night rendezvous with your significant other – arrested. Walk the beach by yourself without a mask – arrested. All of these things happened in relatively recently disarmed Australia.
DO NOT GIVE UP YOUR GUNS. If it is time to lose them in a lake, it is time to use them for their intended purpose. By no means, ABSOLUTELY NO MEANS, are you to seek this out. Let it come to you. Defend yourself against this kind of garbage, but by no means are you to go out and seek a fight. Your God-given rights to self defense are inviolable, the people in England and Australia forgot that fact and lined up to turn in their firearms which were deemed ‘illegal.’ Do not fall for it in the US when that same garbage rolls around here, but, also, take no offensive position against it – defend the Amendment by using the 1st Amendment while you can. If ‘authorities’ come to disarm you – respond effectively and with force if necessary because if they take away your self-defense they will come back and enslave (at best) or rape, torture, and murder (at worst) you and your family.
“16.5 Substantially reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms[.]”
The UN’s entire system of finance is based of corruption and bribery. What nation’s leaders honestly believe they cannot tackle all of the SDG’s within their own nation all on their own? Probably close to none of them. The UN; however, is offering huge sums of money to align with them and their ideas of how to solve these issues, both the real ones (human trafficking), and the made up ones (man-made climate change). Wouldn’t that be bribery if the money were accepted and corruption being bred to protect that money source? The UN wrote a target which actually rejects the way the UN operates. But the UN doesn’t mind that, it’s only their plans and desires that are pure, bribe free and corruption-less.
As of 2018, the percentage of bribes demanded by officials over the previous 12 months, whether or not it was paid, was highest in Mexico with 14.6% of interactions being recorded in such a manner in 2018.
Of businesses being bribed, 148 nations have ever reported these statistics, but only five actual nations reported data in 2020, the latest year captured by the UN, which was reflected in the graph’s table. Tunisia, with 11.9% of it’s businesses being bribed, reported the highest in 2020.
The UN reported a 2020 global rate of business bribery of 16.98% which is absolutely mathematically impossible. The UN graph estimates multiple areas, like Pacific Island Small States, which, the UN reflects, had their businesses bribed 43.8% of the time. This feeds into their 2020 world rate; however, it should not, In order for the UN to create their world rate they had to manipulate numbers from other years. There were absolutely zero small island nation states which have a record for this statistic in 2020.
Does bribery occur? Absolutely. Does it occur between government officials (police, clerks, politicians, etc…)? Absolutely. Do businesses get bribed? Absolutely. How often do these bribes occur? No one knows, not even the UN. Their graphs are beyond repair and their measurements do not reflect any form of the prevalence of bribery and corruption. My best guess is that the UN-approved statistics displayed on these graphs are, in real life, far higher than the rates they reported.
“16.6 Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels[.]”
Raise your hand if you think the CDC is transparent. The WHO? The UN? The US federal government? The government you are under, reader? I haven’t raised my hand yet – none of these bodies are transparent according to me. To define transparency, Merriam-Webster states transparency means, in part 2, “a: free from pretense or deceit; b: easily detected or seen through; c: readily understood; d: characterized by visibility or accessibility of information especially concerning business practices.” I contend that none of these metrics are met by any institution at any level.
The UN’s attempt at figuring this out involves how much money governments wasted on institutions within budgets and their inability to track satisfaction with institutions. Of the UN-tracked indicator of how much money nations spend to fund their institutions, compared to the first expenditure that nation made for said institution, several nations have never reported, including the United States, France, Canada, Australia, South Africa, Japan, New Zealand, and China. All of these nations took the correct approach and gave the UN nothing. Much of the rest of the world; however, missed this point and did report to the UN. Chile, for instance, increased the amount they spent on their institutions between 2007 to 2021, from 87.88% of the approved budget to 132.22% of the approved budget. Many nations have reported over 100% of their approved budget to this (which means they are spending money they do not have and must take money from somewhere else or secure loans).
The UN cannot, and has apparently not really tried, to assess how satisfied people are with the institutions in their nations. I’m assured that the UN won’t track this because people are pretty sick of the institutions of their nations. I know I am sick of them. If anyone from the UN reads this, you can record these results. I am satisfied with 3% of the institutions in my state, 1% of the institutions in my country, and 0% of global institutions to the point that I want every international and just about every federal institution in the US defunded and legislated into oblivion. No more UN, no more WHO, no more IMF or World Bank, no more WTO, and, nationally, no more Department of Education, Department of Energy, EPA, Department of Transportation, no more NSA, no more FBI, no more CIA – and, while I’m at it, no more NIAID, no more CDC, and no more DARPA or BARDA. There are many others I could mention and have either forgotten or have neglected to name.
The UN will refuse to report anything of the like because people, in general, are not aware of the world in which they live and the entities which control them. Even if these people have heard of the institutions within the local, national, and/or international systems – all of those institutionalized systems seeking to enslave them from every level – it is just as likely for that person to condemn the institution as it is to endorse them. I’m sure once the UN has a multitude of nations institute full-scale ‘free’ everything (medical care, tuition, housing, transportation, and income; i.e. UBI) a survey will be taken by the UN while the euphoria and hope within populations is high (because the populace has embraced the Marxism the UN pushes and, hence, are economically retarded) and will be cited for centuries in order to justify their positions. Of course, under this scenario, anyone suggesting a capitalist economy and a representative form of government will be immediately removed from society either through imprisonment and/or execution for blasphemy against the state headed by the UN.
“16.7 Ensure responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels[.]”
The United Nations has never represented anything but the destruction of my God-given rights and a perversion of the norms and traditions which hold society together. In other words they do not, and have never represented a single interest I have. The UN is useless to me, harmful to my survival, and hostile towards humanity.
The UN has a proven track record of failing to appropriately respond to situations, include groups in which they have no interest in hearing from, allow all groups equal participation in decision making processes, and has no elected member within its body, thus these UN monsters cannot represent the interests of the people, only the interests of the government which sent them to the UN.
At the national level, at least in the United States, the UN has kept its mouth shut because they have a rubber-stamping puppet in the White House who will do the UN’s bidding in order to achieve the UN’s version of the world. The administration occupying the White House does not care what they do to the citizenry of the country, as long as the UN-approved agenda is rammed down all of our throats. Like the UN, the US government is unresponsive to concerns which are raised and routinely lie outright or perform verbal gymnastics to obfuscate issues because they do not fear any negative consequences of their actions nor being held to account for purposely lying to US citizens or their representatives. The representatives which refuse to go along with the administration’s goals have been censored, removed from committee seats, and have even been taken to court in attempts to disallow them from running for future offices. These types of attempts to cancel elected leaders who do stand with the people are chilling in participating in anything the administration disfavors. The US is not representative of the people living within it, but they are highly compliant with anyone who stuffs cash into their bank accounts and the UN with they use as a money-laundering operation.
Of the 50 states, over the last 5 years I have resided in two of them – South Dakota and Minnesota. Before August 2020, when I left Minnesota for South Dakota, I was routinely kicked out of stores for not wearing the face diaper. I was suspended from my job for a day for not wearing a face diaper. Housing costs were about 80% higher in Minnesota than in South Dakota. Gas prices were higher. There were random curfews and massive riots because of George Floyd. Governor Tim Walz sat there and demanded compliance to the CDC, WHO, NIH, NIAID, and the UN goals behind the executive orders which he decreed. He shut down churches, small businesses, and overtaxed Minnesotan’s for years. Much Walz’s problem stemmed from illegally issued executive orders which he decreed. He shut the government down too and refused, on multiple occasions, to reconvene the legislator to get rid of the emergency declaration Walz ordered. Protests went unheard. Complaints went unmet. People lost their jobs, their businesses, and their livelihoods while riots, antifa, and general violence went unchecked. Walz didn’t care. The UN didn’t want Walz to care. And Walz was one of the bastards who directed COVID-19 positive people to be placed inside of nursing homes which exacerbated the medical problems in the facilities while at the same time restricting loved ones from seeing their grandparents.
In South Dakota, I was not harassed about a mask. I went to the grocery store and didn’t get kicked out and I did it without a mask. I went to Walmart and told the security guard that I didn’t want a mask and walked by him and he didn’t do anything. I wasn’t harried by overzealous Target employees demanding me I stick a dirty rag over my mouth and nose like I was in Minnesota. I walked into Kohl’s and bought towels, in person, without a mask on. Kohl’s was closed in Minnesota. The costs for goods were cheaper including for gas, food, and housing. The wages for labor; however, were comparable, although slightly less in South Dakota. Kristi Noem, the governor of South Dakota allowed people and businesses to make their own decisions, did not shut down thousands of businesses, and was globally demonized for rejecting the protocols demanded by the UN and national governmental public health agencies, institutions, and various non-governmental organizations. She is not perfect, but South Dakota did the pandemic correctly – Minnesota failed miserably.
The UN doesn’t care about the well-being of the people living in South Dakota and they make this very clear through their indicators under this target. Monitoring the prevalence of women in politics does not matter because politics is about ideas. But that’s what counts to the UN – identity politics. Women in lower houses of parliament are under-represented by about half around the world according to the UN. Four nations are over-represented by women – UAE, Guinea, Rwanda, and Cuba. Three nations recorded no women being in their lower parliaments – Yemen, Papua New Guinea, and Vanuatu.
In upper chambers of parliaments around the world, three nations and two geographical areas are adequately represented by women or over-represented by women – Bolivia, Australia, Oceania, Australia and New Zealand, and Antigua and Barbados. Haiti is the only nation which has no women in an upper parliament seat. Some nations don’t have upper and lower parliaments; however, and, obviously no one can be represented if the body does not exist. Globally, women are under-represented in upper parliamentary houses by about half according to the UN.
The UN’s identity-politics is only helping nations to disintegrate faster because when identity is the merit of an elected official, intellect and practical solutions are not necessary. It makes the issues which impact everyday lives unimportant because it all of a sudden matter more what color the representatives skin color is, what gender they identify as, and what country they came from when they declared themselves a refugee. Give me issues and solutions, I will make my decision from there, without caring whether or not the candidate identifies as a black-Asian trans-gendered non-binary monarch butterfly.
Another metric the UN uses to evaluate their target is whether or not people believe their governments are inclusive and responsive. The UN has not bothered to ask normal people any of these questions., but there are ways to get a general feel of how this indicator is going. It’s not going well for the UN which is likely why they have no tracking data. Joe Biden, the installed UN-puppet, the president of the United States of America has an approval rating of 40.7 as of May 20, 2022. If I had to guess how this statistic was derived I would guess an over-representation of democrat to republican of about 70-30. On May 19, 2022 Kamala Harris, an illegitimate vice-president who is not Constitutionally able to sit in the seat of vice-president of the USA, has a disapproval rating of 51.8% with only 39.4% approving of her service. I would guess that the same democrat – republican split was employed.
There are food riots breaking out around the world, some of which have turned deadly. In Sri Lanka rioters murdered several government officials. In Iran the government murdered an unknown number of rioters. There are slightly less violent riots taking place in Iraq and Peru. Multiple other nations are facing their own food riots. This does not portend well for the UN’s indicator.
There is a meeting at Davos taking place right now. It’s been reported that there are thousands of armed military members protecting the Davos meeting in the remote Switzerland town. Reporters are being harassed and arrested for trying to report on the events taking place. Mainstream media outlets, if they mention Davos at all, are cheeerleading the events taking place within. Davos always deals with setting global directions and suggesting policies which the nations of the world and the people in those nations will have to adopt and implement or those places and people will get ‘left behind.’ More and more, people have grown wise to the idea that those ‘left behind’ is really used as a compliance tool based on phsychological warfare tactics. Those that really are ‘left behind’, especially those who actively reject and fight back against the secret meetings and agreements conducted at places such as Davos, are the primary targets of their cancel-culture, silencing, and extermination campaigns. None of this fosters an inclusive or responsive belief in any government, especially the one really calling the shots – the globalists meeting in Davos.
Ronald Reagan has several quotes which are prescient and have been given renewed potency in the last decade or so. The first quote, “Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem,” and the second quote, “the nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help," is becoming very apparent to a vast majority of the world. Governments of the world have taken every opportunity to separate themselves from the people whom they are supposed to represent and when the government does ‘act on the behalf of the people’ they continuously find way to injure, both financially and physically, those very people. Think about Katrina. The government was responsible for the disaster-risk management of Lake Pontchartrain, other parts of the government prevented that management from taking place, the lake flooded New Orleans, and the government then came in to act as a savior by setting up a rape camp (called the Astrodome) and distributing trailers unfit for human occupation. Reagan was complete correct in these two quotes, and Kartrina is by far not the only example.
“16.8 Broaden and strengthen the participation of developing countries in the institutions of global governance[.]”
The United Nations is making something really bad sound really positive. They are trying to bring in, and give bigger roles in decision-making, to nations which are receiving handouts from other countries. If there are 193 countries on earth, and 137 of those nations are considered developing or least developing countries. If anyone believes nearly 71% of the nations on earth are expected to vote in a global body to help the whole globe when there are billions of dollars up for grab for those same nations, I have a bridge to sell you. That contingent of 71% is going to vote for monies extorted from the other 39% of the nations of the planet. They are going to do it consistently and gradually demand more and more. The UN is really stating their intention to continue their global welfare scheme by having the welfare recipients vote on whether or not they should get the welfare.
The compositions of several global governance bodies (the UN’s description – not mine) are represented in the following percentages by developing nations: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 75.13%; International Monetary Fund, 75.13%; International Finance Corporation, 75%; UN General Assembly, 74.09%; World Trade Organization, 72.56%; UN Economic and Social Council, 64.81%; UN Security Council, 53.33%; and Financial Stability Board, 50%.
“16.9 By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration[.]”
If you were in charge of eliminating people, the first thing to do would be to know what people need to be eliminated. IBM revolutionized the idea in the 1930’s for their client: the Third Reich. IBM developed punch cards which enabled Hitler’s SS to easily identify and count the numbers of Jews in any particular area. IBM gave the Nazi’s the technological ability to identify, locate, and round up the Jews of not only Germany but of the nations the Germans captured as well as allowed the Nazi’s to identify other unwanted elements of humanity within their territories. At least 12 million people died because of the system IBM developed.
These legal identity decrees are nothing more than a repeat of IBM’s efforts to assist Nazi Germany in it’s Final Solution. As of 2017, 70.62% of all of the children 5 and under of the world were legally registered through birth certificates. In certain places, like Ethiopia and Somalia, less than 5% of that population has a birth certificate. Identifying those from either of those nations will be particularly difficult for anyone trying to take an inventory, let alone to identify individuals. Meanwhile, there are many nations which have over 90% rates of births documented by birth certificates, which make inventorying and identifying individuals a much easier task.
I will not delve into this issue too deeply, but it is important to note here. Under Admiralty law, there is a school of thought which suggests that the birth certificate is owned by the civil authority which possess it. This basically relates to the idea that everyone with a birth certificate, stored by civil authorities, is owned by the civil authority and is subject to Admiralty laws – not the particular laws fo the nations in which they live. I have not been convinced of this idea; however, it is interesting to research.
The bottom line here is that the UN is stating its real end goal – massive depopulation of the humanity on earth. The first step necessary to complete that plan is to have the ability to know how many set for extermination there are followed by identifying those who are most undesirable. The gauge of undesirability could be those who present the biggest obstacles to such goals, groups which will likely physically resist, those who understand such plans and expose the plan. We are watching that happen now. Certain demographic groups, racial groups, and genetic groups will then be scored in the order of their extermination. We have all been living in a world where the elderly and the young, the two most vulnerable groups in any society, have been directly targeted for extinction – the elderly with COVID-19 and the young through abortion and proposals for infanticide. Russia invaded Ukraine, in part, due to intelligence which led the Russians to conclude that race specific bioweapons were being developed by NATO and NATO-members in Ukraine which would target Slavic genotypes. The first steps of these types of programs is to inventory and identify, birth certificates are a wonderful way to achieve that.
“16.10 Ensure public access to information and protect fundamental freedoms, in accordance with national legislation and international agreements[.]”
The UN has a document called The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Any time the UN speaks to rights, it is speaking to this meaningless document. There are positive rights and negative rights. While positive always sounds better, in this case negative right grant more robust protections against the abuse of rights.
For instance, in the United States, the federal, and many individual State constitutions, include a passage about speech. The First Amendment is where this is located within the US Constitution and it reads, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This is a negative right because it prevents the US Government from conducting itself in certain ways, despite early and continuing attacks upon the statement.
Conversely, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UN codified a positive right for the press. The closest passage protecting the press in the UNDHR reads, “Article 19: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” The catch to this, and all of the rest of the articles of the UNDHR, comes in Article 29, Paragraph 3, “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” The United Nations has decided that these rights can only exist if the UN wants them to exist. In UNESCO meets to discuss how best to release Ebola in a population to create a 12 Monkeys scenario, and they don’t want that information leaked out, Article 19 will be suspended because it will be going against the UN’s purpose and principles. These are examples of positive rights because they only exist based upon the whims of the body granting them.
According to the UN, in 2015 there were 349 homicides of journalists in the world. In 2020 there were 393 murders of journalists worldwide. It seems that the sources of news stories are being increasingly dispatched with.
In late May 2022, the journalists attending the Davos meeting were greeted by WEF Security Guards armed with compact machine guns. These gestapo demanded that the journalists attending the meeting stop filming. The meeting features promises of starvation, famine, bankruptcy, economic collapse, arrests, new lock-downs, the end of free speech, and gun confiscation, in order to implement the Davos plan for medical tyranny, biometric ID’s, nanotechnology coursing our veins, 3D printed and GMO food, the social credit score, and biometric payment systems. The promise is that speaking out against these ideas will get anyone doing so censored with the intent to arrest or murder the speaker. This includes journalists. Toe the line or be silenced.
The other UN indicator for this target is in a graph defined as measuring, “Countries that have adopted and implemented constitutional, statutory and/or policy guarantees for public access to information. The focus of this indicator is thus on the status of adoption and implementation of constitutional, statutory and/or policy guarantees for public access to information.” 127 nations have this public access to information.
This sounds good unless any rational thought is applied to it. Go back up to Article 19 and Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights. Then ask, what information is going to be deemed safe for public consumption? What I am writing right now is not deemed safe. It makes no difference that all of it is true. What matters is the narratives these monsters want to weave around any issue, event, story, or person and the media’s compliance with that narrative. Already, the public has access to what these demonic things and that access will not disappear – what will disappear is access to Doug Hagmann, Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, Steve Quayle, Tucker Carlson, Dinesh D-Sousa, and the likes.
Make no mistake about this, the UN, WEF, World Bank, Bilderberg Group, Open Society Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the governments of the earth, and many businesses (especially the ones which are multinational) want people to shut up, go to sleep, and passively accept this Great Reset. While speaking out about the truth of the plans of these monsters is dangerous, even knowing what is going on is becoming increasingly dangerous. Either we all speak up and say no, or we will all suffer the same fate. That fate is enslavement, imprisonment, and death at the hands of a global government securely rooted in Satanism, eugenics, and totalitarian technocracy. As George Orwell put it – “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.” The future he spoke of is today.
“16.a Strengthen relevant national institutions, including through international cooperation, for building capacity at all levels, in particular in developing countries, to prevent violence and combat terrorism and crime[.]”
The UN tracks this through measuring compliance with something called the Paris Principles. The full title is Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions. Under the guise of human rights, the UN is seeking to set up global compliance standards which establishes governmental bodies in order to allow NGO’s to have a voice within the government as well as give NGO demands the same status as official governmental information releases. The UN never defines human rights in the document, which is problematic. I would imagine the UN wants all of these bodies to adhere to whatever the UN has deemed a right at the current time according to their UNDHR document.
The point of the Paris Principles is to subvert governments of the nations of the world by getting rabid globalist-aligned Communists and technocrats to come together under the guise of human rights. These groups include:
“(a) Non-governmental organizations responsible for human rights and efforts to combat racial discrimination, trade unions, concerned social and professional organizations, for example, associations of lawyers, doctors, journalists and eminent scientists; (b) Trends in philosophical or religious thought; (c) Universities and qualified experts; (d) Parliament; (e) Government departments (if these are included, their representatives should participate in the deliberations only in an advisory capacity).”
The UN has, and continues to, attempt to get every single individual and institution, both private and public, on the UN ideology which represents death and enslavement for billions of people. Any nation which even begins to undertake the Paris Principles is only accomplishing one thing for its people – the destruction of the national government and the sovereignty it holds. It is completely plausible the UN has infiltrated Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch; Black Lives Matter and NAACP; Teamsters and AFL-CIO; ABA; AMA; SPJ; American Public Health Association and American Society of State Climatologists; any church listed on the World Council of Churches website; Harvard, Yale, and just about all of the rest of the university systems in the United States as well as the ‘experts’ those indoctrination centers release into the world; members of Congress; EPA, DoD, DoEd. Where are the treason charges for those swearing oaths to the US Constitution but in reality carrying on the bidding of the UN and their goal of one-world government through the stealth of supporting the Paris Principles?
The body which is established under the Paris Principles is supposedly completely independent of governmental intervention. These NGO’s are supposed to be well-funded by sources other than the government in order to maintain their independence. When broadly following the money, the government of a nation taxes its citizens, the government determines how much of those tax revenues to give to the UN for whatever program they have going on (money is fungible), and, once the UN receives the monies, they can give whatever amount they deem applicable to any NGO they deem appropriately represents the UN’s goals.
There is also a judicial aspect to the independent National Human Rights Institutions established under the Paris Principles. There is no due process in these judicial proceedings, save for the petitioner to know their rights and for the court to promote those rights.
Almost half the world have signed up for the Paris Principles by establishing a National Human Rights Institution. 61.42% of the nations of the world has applied for accreditation to have independent National Human Rights Institutions recognized as complying with the Paris Principles.
“16.b Promote and enforce non-discriminatory laws and policies for sustainable development[.]”
The tracking mechanism for this target relies completely upon feelings. How many people felt discriminated against? 48% of Swedes reported having felt discriminated against in 2018 (I don’t know if that number came from the rape-culture the EU demanded Sweden take into their borders or if it was actual Swedes). In 2015 Swedes reported a discrimination rate of 40%. To be fair, only 35 countries reported this to the UN. Almost all of these nations only reported the statistic once, making it impossible to track over time. Of the 9 nations which reported in two different years, Denmark, Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, and New Zealand reported increased rates (Denmark came in 359% higher between 2014 and 2016). Of the four nations which decreased – Peru, Estonia, Chile, and the Netherlands, with the highest decrease occurring in Peru from 2015 to 2019; 17.3% to 12.6% (-4.7%).
I don’t need to feel anything to know that I have been discriminated against legally, professionally, and personally. I’m not a victim, I am a learner, and have learned to rise against and above this discrimination. I’ve been discriminated because I am white, because I am a male, and because of who I know and my relationship to them. I’ve been discriminated against because of my political and religious affiliations as well.
Summary
This goal, on it’s face, seeks to define the meaning of a just, peaceful, and inclusive society. The goal doesn't manage to even approach any of those definitions. There are multiple definitions of what just (justice) is depending on the predilections of the society involved. In some nations stoning to death adulterers is the practice. In other nations adultery is merely a cause for divorce. In one nation convicted murderers are locked into prison for a term, in another there is the promise of retribution killing, and in others there is a light sentence meted out which allows for a murderers release from detention.
What is just to me is defined in the Bible. What happens to adulterers and murderers in the Bible? They cease to exist because of the corruption and chaos which their actions have caused.
There is, quite obviously, no peace in this world. At least 21 nations are currently at war either internally or externally. The UN has an admitted ‘Peacekeeping Force’ in 12 nations. These UN peacekeeping forces are notorious for their own war crimes in the areas in which they operate including allegations of murder, rape, and torture. Nothing is ever done to rectify these issues. One of the earliest missions of the UN Peacekeeping Forces crushed an independence movement led by Moshe Tshombe, a capitalist who rejected the Democratic Republic of Congo’s Communist prime minister Lumumba’s decrees, after their liberation. The UN celebrated this. The Democratic Republic of Congo is one of the poorest, most corrupt, and inept nations on earth to this day. The UN aided in the DRC’s destitution by erasing anything which even looks like it may be Capitalist. Any peace or prosperity which arises outside of UN desires will be militarily fought against.
I’m not included under the UN’s idea of inclusive. I loathe any notions of a global government and I detest the very idea of their existence, their desires, and their exploits. I am not a female, not considered indigenous, not a child, not a racial minority, not a religious minority and not a stakeholder in the UN’s plans. I don’t fit into a protected group – I’m not disabled, I don’t have a mental issue, I don’t identify myself with a gender identity. I have been very misguided in my past and have repented of those transgressions, and today completely believe in God (Adonai) and His son Jesus Christ (Yeshua). Thus, I, and millions of others with similar beliefs, have absolutely no place under the UN system. As, such the UN will not think twice when it comes to liquidating our speech or our lives.
The UN is dictating what people should think about justice, peace, and what being included means. Those which receive no justice, have no peace, and are not included in decision making are slated for extinction. Resisting UN targets or the UN in general isn’t the only qualification for being targeted for extermination, but it will move one up the list.
Apart from extermination plans, the UN is attempting to dictate what justice, peace, and inclusiveness is to all of the nations of the world. In certain targets the UN actively states their efforts to subvert the sovereign government of a nation. A globalized idea of justice will result in a globalized SYSTEM of ‘justice.’ A globalized meaning of peace, will only make UN ‘Peacekeeping Missions’ look like law enforcement operations instead of what they actually are – war. Inclusiveness will only extend to the groups and individuals the UN decides to include. At the end of all of this is a perversion of justice, a warlike stance towards peace, and a rigid system of designating those who are included and declaring war upon those who are not so aligned.
Open a Bible and read it. May God Bless You.
All quotes were found at https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal16 unless otherwise documented.