The WHO Deserves Gallows Not Power
The WHO Deserves Gallows Not Power
Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity – 12/30/2022
There was increased interest in the WHO’s goings on about a year ago. One major reason for the increased interest was the WHO’s intention to create a globally binding pandemic treaty. To effect the creation of the treaty, the WHO appointed an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) which met for the first time on February 24, 2022 which was continued on March 14-15, June 6-8, and June 15-17. The INB’s second meeting was on July 18-22. The third and most recent meeting of the INB occurred on December 5-7.
On November 25, 2022, the day after Thanksgiving, the INB released a draft of their intentions titled Conceptual zero draft for the consideration of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body at its third meeting. Anywhere this treaty is adopted, the WHO will subjugate all of that that entities people and murder huge percentages of those people as well. I have to use the term entities because, while they are evil, signing on to this treaty is open to not only nations (Member States and Associate States) but to economic integration organizations as well. For instance, if you live in Minneapolis, MN – that means the Metropolitan Council could sign their economically integrated seven-county territory up for this garbage even if the municipalities don’t want to, the State of Minnesota decides against it, and the United States government miraculously doesn’t sign it. NAFTA, CAFTA, the EU, and ASEAN could also sign up for it.
As soon as 40 entities sign it, the treaty goes into effect 30 days from the date number 40 signed up (Article 31/1). After the original 40, each additional party will have this treaty go into effect 30 days after they sign up (Article 31/2 and 31/3). To get out of it notification must be made after having been party to the treaty for 2 years (Article 24/1) and then must wait a full year (Article 24/2) until the entity is actually out from under the WHO’s medical tyranny.
The word tyranny doesn’t really describe the draft of this treaty very well. It is absolutely Marxist (with leanings towards the fascist side). And it is absolutely totalitarian. Article 14/2/(b) reads “Tackle the social, environmental and economic determinants of health that contribute to the emergence and spread of pandemics, and prevent or mitigate the socioeconomic impacts of pandemics, including but not limited to, those affecting economic growth, the environment, employment, trade, transport, gender equality, education, social assistance, housing, food insecurity, nutrition and culture, and especially for persons in vulnerable situations[.]” The WHO is not even hiding their intent to destroy every single aspect of life in all of those domains.
Article 3 is the “objective” of the treaty. It reads, “The objective of the WHO CA+, guided by the vision and principles set out therein, is to save lives and protect livelihoods, through strengthening, proactively, the world’s capacities for preventing, preparing for and responding to, and recovery of health systems from pandemics. The WHO CA+ aims to address systemic gaps and challenges that exist in these areas, at national, regional and international levels, through substantially reducing the risk of pandemics, increasing pandemic preparedness and response capacities, and ensuring coordinated, collaborative and evidence-based pandemic response and resilient recovery of health systems.”
Additional tyrannies quickly pile up after this statement is made. The treaty gives the WHO certain powers over the supply chain (Article 6), technological transfers (Article 7), the proliferation of biological warfare laboratories (Article 8), and forcing nations to engage in resource sharing (Article 9).
Article 10 gets much more personal with everyday human beings. Surveillance systems are demanded for human, animal, and environmental sources of possible disease (Article 10/2/(a)/(i)). The idea of total surveillance over all life forms including waste material from those life forms is known as the One Health approach, a term used throughout this treaty. Article 4/14 defines One Health as, “Multisectoral actions should recognize the importance of a coherent, integrated and unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems, including through, but not limited to, attention to the prevention of epidemics due to pathogens resistant to antimicrobial agents.”
Genomic sequencing (no source or restriction is defined here, meaning human genomic sequencing as well as the sequencing of pathogens will be permitted; Article 10/2/(a)/(ii)), epidemic prevention stategization (Article 10/2/(a)/(iii)), and price fixing (Article 10/2/(a)/(iv)) are all demanded as well. “Strengthen public health capacities to ensure availability of quality routine health services, including immunization, during pandemics, and continuity of essential health service provision during the response, notably with a focus on primary health care and community level interventions, to mitigate the shocks caused by emergencies and prevent the health system from becoming overwhelmed, by means that include (Article 10/2/(b)): (i) measures to ensure continuity of primary health care and universal health coverage by maintaining the availability of, and timely access to, efficacious, quality, safe, effective, affordable and equitable health services, including clinical and mental health care (ii) measures to address the backlog in the diagnosis and treatment of, and interventions for, other illnesses during pandemics.” Article 4/15 defines universal health coverage as, “– The WHO CA+ will be guided by the aim of achieving universal health coverage, for which strong and resilient health systems are of key importance, as a fundamental aspect of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals through promoting health and well-being for all at all ages.”
There is a clear focus placed on immunizations occurring even during a disease outbreak. The idea of universal health care means that no one will be able to have individualized health care. Also, it is important to point out, Sustainable Development Goals is a really nice way of saying murder 7.5 billion human beings. Universal healthcare is the WHO’s effort to help the UN achieve their genocidal dreams.
Article 11 focuses on making sure that there are literal standing armies of health care workers to carry out the WHO’s sick intentions. Article 12 elaborates on surveillance and tracking of everything. The WHO demands that preparedness plans be drawn up and implemented (Article 12/2/(a)), that those plans have evaluation metrics created and adopted (Article 12/2/(b)), the plans be used in drills to evaluate them at the global, national, and regional levels (Article 12/2/(c), a global peer review system be created and implemented (Article 12/2/(d)), the recommendations derived from any review process be implemented (Article 12/2/(e)), and regular reporting be conducted in relation to all of these efforts (Article 12/2/(f)).
If it sounds terrible, it will be worse than anyone can imagine. It necessitates snap lockdowns with mass text messages reminding us that this is only a minor inconvenience and is just a drill. The idea is to get us used to being jerked around at a moment’s notice. All that will do is inspire fear in the populations in which these drills occur in. As far as a global peer review system – the WHO is demanding that science by consensus is credible while anything outside of the narrative they adopt, scientific or otherwise, is to be completely disregarded. In other words, WHO and its friends will make all of the ‘truth’ up out of whatever narrative they decide they want to use. Science under the WHO will turn into nothing but lethal propaganda.
Article 13/2/(a) reads “Promote global, regional and national political commitment, coordination and leadership for pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of the health system, by means that include establishing appropriate governance arrangements/[good governance principles] rooted in the Constitution of the World Health Organization.” In effect the WHO will start writing the laws of every nation in the world. The policies they will approve of and/or write themselves will feature being based on science and evidence (Article 13/2/(b)), inclusive (Article 13/2/(c)), and promote solidarity with other nations (Article 13/2/(d)). Article 13/2/(e) really gets at the heart of the matter though – control. It reads “Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations; (i) facilitate WHO rapid access to outbreak areas, including through the deployment of expert teams to evaluate and support the response to emerging outbreaks.”
Notice that the WHO is demanding authority over anything considered to be international health work. Gun restrictions, health passports, drug interdiction, surveillance operations, refugees, medical ‘misinformation’, migrant workers, and children’s health are some areas where the WHO could step in and try to assert its authority. This is very clearly dangerous to the freedoms and liberties of the people on the planet. The WHO wants to ban all guns in civilian hands, mandate health passports, get involved with drug interdiction to make sure that only their approved drugs are able to be obtained, surveil everything, manage refugee flows, end free speech, dictate the treatment of migrant workers, and kidnap children from their parents. This fits perfectly into their idea of utopia but when they attempt to pull it off in the real world they will find the entire earth embroiled in a civil war against their WHO-compliant governments. They would love to see nothing less – it speeds up their depopulation efforts.
Article 15 is all about engaging the community to effect their notion of whole-of-society efforts. The WHO will never let a normal human being speak to them about the issues they are actually having. Instead, the WHO will select stakeholders they believe are relevant and seek to meet their demands – the majority of the people are supposed to just go along with whatever the WHO decides for them. All they are going to do is set up globally controlled propaganda arms with the aim of getting the masses to ‘voluntarily’ comply because they have been lied to. This deception will lead to much bloodshed and, in it’s proper context, is intimidation and coercion. They plan to achieve this by implementing the five sections of Article 15/2:
“(a) Engage with communities, civil society, academia and non-State actors, including the private sector, as part of a whole-of-society approach to pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems; (b) Promote science and evidence-based/informed effective and timely risk assessment, including the uncertainty of data when communicating such risk to the public; (c) Mobilize social capital in communities for mutual support, especially to persons in vulnerable situations; (d) Promote two-way engagement of civil society, communities and non-State actors, including the private sector, as part of a whole-of-society response that involves communities in decision making and uses feedback mechanisms; (e) Establish or reinforce and adequately finance an effective national coordinating multisectoral mechanism with meaningful representation, engagement, participation and empowerment of communities, for pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.”
Article 16 is very similar to Article 15. The difference is a shift of focus. Article 16 wants to use these same psychological terrorist tactics to effect the result the WHO desires in the area of medical and scientific literacy. Two big key to the WHO’s entire plan are to “Strengthen public trust and counter misinformation and disinformation (Article 16/2/(e))” and “Strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions (Article 16/2/(f)).” If we don’t trust them we will be shut up by WHO AI bots. If the WHO cannot figure out that many of us know their plans and intentions, genocide and possible extinction of the whole human species, and that we are never going to trust them because we know that, I don’t know what to tell murderers at the WHO.
One Health is the topic of Article 17. Article 17/2 reads, “(a) Promote and implement a One Health approach that is coherent, coordinated and collaborative among all relevant actors, existing instruments and initiatives, by means that include: (i) measures to identify and integrate into relevant pandemic prevention and preparedness plans, drivers for the emergence of disease at the human–animal– environment interface, including but not limited to climate change, land use change, wildlife trade, desertification and antimicrobial resistance.” Ah yes – perhaps the idea of climate change as healthcare never crossed your mind, reader. Hopefully it has now and, since climate never stops changing (completely without mankind’s assistance) the pandemic of climate change will never end.
Article 18 is financing, specifically the sustainable, equitable, fair, and predictable kind of financing which everyone on earth refers to as welfare programs. Financing is again addressed in Article 22. The four provisions listed under Article 22 disabuse any reader of the proposed treaty of any speculations about whether or not this is a global welfare ploy. Article 22 demands that the treaty be used as a global welfare vehicle.
Article 19 is about the structure of the governing body of the treaty. Article 21 demands that this governing body evaluate and review the treaty and its provisions. Article 25 set who gets to vote. Article 26 is the amendment procedure to the treaty and Article 27 is how to amend the annexes to the treaty. Article 28 regards protocols, Article 29 denotes who permitted signatories are, and Article 30 is about how regional economic integration organizations can adopt the treaty. Article 32 is about provisional adoptions, Article 33 is about dispute resolution, Article 34 identifies the depository of the treaty to be the Secretary-General of the United Nations, and the final article, number 35, notes that the original text of this dumpster fire will be submitted to the Secretay-General of the United Nations as well.
I skipped Articles 23 and 20. I did this on purpose. Article 23 reads, “1. No reservations may be made to the WHO CA+.” Nice and to the point. It means that under no circumstances will any party to this treaty be able to pick and choose the sections they will comply with and the ones they won’t comply with. All parties are subject to the entire document or they are subject to none of it.
Article 20 may be the most damning Article of the entire document. That is saying something because the rest of the document details who medical decisions which were once part of being a parent and an individual choice will now be handled by the WHO. If the WHO says get your COVID-19 injections because the WHO sees them as safe and effective and needed in order to live a functional life we can drop entirely out of society in general or comply against our will. To the end, Article 20 was written,
“1. The Governing Body, at its first meeting, shall consider and approve cooperative procedures and institutional mechanisms to promote compliance with the provisions of the WHO CA+ and, if deemed appropriate, to address cases of non-compliance. 2. These measures, procedures and mechanisms shall include monitoring provisions and accountability measures to systematically address preparedness for, response to, and the impact of pandemics, by means that include submission of periodic reports, reviews, remedies and actions, and to offer advice or assistance, where appropriate. These measures shall be separate from, and without prejudice to, the dispute settlement procedures and mechanisms under the WHO CA+.”
A bunch of psychopathic genocidal maniacs have created a global treaty which destroys free speech, the right to self defense, the idea that we have any sort of privacy (especially during a pandemic), or that the re is a Nuremberg code is going to decide if it appropriate to address issues or non-compliance. These people want every human being on earth to drop dead tomorrow. Since it won’t be tomorrow that all of us drop dead, they wrote this treaty to speed the process up. Maybe they should just come right out and do what they are going to do by the end of this anyway. The WHO, for the first time ever, should just be transparent and up front with the humans on this earth and let all of us know that non-compliance is terrorism and terrorism is to be combated by death.
And one may ask, well why is this such a big deal if it is only really for pandemics. The answer is, it’s not only for pandemics because it features continuous surveillance efforts. But it does give rise to questions about exactly how it is that the WHO decides to declare a pandemic. The WHO is very opaque about this. They use a term, public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), as well as how widespread the disease is in order to declare a pandemic. According to the WHO’s International Health Regulations (IHR’s), “A PHEIC is defined in the IHR (2005) as, “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other States through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response”. This definition implies a situation that is: serious, sudden, unusual or unexpected; carries implications for public health beyond the affected State’s national border; and may require immediate international action.”
According to CTV News, a PHEIC is able to be declared after four questions are answered. Those questions are, “is the public health impact of the event serious; is this an unusual or unexpected event; is there risk for international spread; and is there a significant risk for international travel or trade risk?” The answers are different for every disease. For COVID-19 the answers were (and still are) no, no, yes, and no. The WHO helped the world stop anyway. COVID-19 is not the only PHEIC the WHO has declared either. Polio and monkeypox are also noted as ongoing PHEIC’s. But remember, the WHO treaty uses the term health, not pandemic, in order to gain it’s faux authoritative status.
What does all of this mean? It means that there will be one, global, unified totalitarian health system established. It means that we as individuals will have far less choice in making medical decisions for ourselves and far more severe and wide-ranging repercussions for non-compliance. Most importantly is that it leaves no moral, ethical, or religious considerations on the table for anyone to claim in order to get out from these dictates. Basically the WHO is really proud of themselves and their efforts because overall what they are attempting to accomplish without saying it is placing the creation over the Creator. It’s not a wise thing to do, but I’ve never made any cases supporting the WHO’s wisdom.
Any member of any nation which has anyone involved with this treaty needs to immediately recall that individual and charge them with treason. That’s what this is – treason. The WHO itself should be completely defunded and the WHO’s leadership tried for treason and crimes against humanity. You know why there will be no political push back on this? Because the politicians want this treaty in effect. The politicians can go make sure the whole world suffers under the boot of this medical tyranny without having to really be concerned with getting the blame directly. And the WHO won’t care how much they are hated, they will only care about how well all parties, from individuals and families all the way up to national governments and international economic integration regions, obey their narrative.
It’s death. The WHO is offering the world death and the national leaders of the world have lined up to endorse the death of their citizens. I suggest we start looking for God, reading our Bibles, praying to end this evil, and asking for discernment. The time is growing rather short to make up ones mind in my opinion. The WHO deserves gallows for these actions, not additional power.
Bless God and God bless. May he rid the earth of these monsters at the WHO and all of their adherents and enablers.