How are the UN Sustainability Goals Going? Goal 5 of 17.
How are the UN Sustainability Goals Going? Goal 5 of 17.
Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity
4/4/2022
The seventeen United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the goals of the Great Reset. The SDGs were adopted in 2015 by United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The cover for the SDGs were that they would provide relief for disabled peoples by 2030 according to Agenda 2030. To fully understand Agenda 2030, a review of Agenda 21 should be undertaken, which I will not do here. In this article I will focus on the 5th SDG:
Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
The United Nations is telling the world that they want to destroy the traditional nuclear family around the world. While I agree with some of the targets of this goal, such as ending female genital mutilation, but other targets, like calling for an end to all discrimination is a denial of human experience. After all, discrimination means to note differences and act on them accordingly, but I digress, let’s explore these targets more fully.
The UN’s targets to ensure all of us are well educated from cradle to grave are:
“5.1 End all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere
“5.2 Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in the public and private spheres, including trafficking and sexual and other types of exploitation
“5.3 Eliminate all harmful practices, such as child, early and forced marriage and female genital mutilation
“5.4 Recognize and value unpaid care and domestic work through the provision of public services, infrastructure and social protection policies and the promotion of shared responsibility within the household and the family as nationally appropriate
“5.5 Ensure women’s full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making in political, economic and public life
“5.6 Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights as agreed in accordance with the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development and the Beijing Platform for Action and the outcome documents of their review conferences
“5.a Undertake reforms to give women equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to ownership and control over land and other forms of property, financial services, inheritance and natural resources, in accordance with national laws
“5.b Enhance the use of enabling technology, in particular information and communications technology, to promote the empowerment of women
“5.c Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation for the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at all levels”
I’m going to cover these one by one.
“5.1 End all forms of discrimination against all women and girls everywhere[.]”
The definition of discrimination from Merriam Webster is: “1a: prejudiced or prejudicial outlook, action, or treatment b: the act, practice, or an instance of discriminating categorically rather than individually 2: the quality or power of finely distinguishing 3a: the act of making or perceiving a difference : the act of discriminating b: psychology : the process by which two stimuli differing in some aspect are responded to differently”
I’m going to assume that the UN is talking about the first definition of discrimination listed here, specifically related towards female human beings. Sounds great. Let’s sign all women up for the United States Selective Service, and set quotas for women who are involved with the labor required to drill oil, work on a fishing boat, and build the stupid new-age windmills the whole world has seemingly fallen in love with. I’m not saying that women cannot do these things. What I am saying is that women (and most men) do not do these things because they are dangerous and require a certain degree of physical capability combined with a technical inclination. Men and women are just built different, and that is a fact.
Girls and boys should both be given access to education. Men and women should both be given the same access to gainful employment. Men and women should both be in safe environments in their work environments and with in their homes. Want to be a female auto-mechanic, welder, oil-rigger? Great! I don’t care, fix that car, weld that joint, or get that oil out of the ground. Want to be a female astronaut, again I don’t care, fulfill your mission. Want to play left defensive end for the Seattle Seahawks? Super! Go get beefed up and ripped and learn to block; male or female DE – I don’t care (nor will I watch the NFL because of you).
Because this target is overly broad, I will note the indicator for this target – “5.1.1: Whether or not legal frameworks are in place to promote, enforce and monitor equality and non‑discrimination on the basis of sex” – which should give us a more solid direction to proceed. But it does not, because the UN seemingly refuses to define sex as male or female. So it leaves us in limbo. “People use a wide variety of words to describe themselves and their identities, and it’s important to respect the terms, names and pronouns people use to refer to themselves,” according to the UN; which also categorically refused to answer any inquiry as to what sex actually means (I phoned them 6 times and was dismissed [hung up on or sent to voicemail] every single time in attempts to gain any insight into their definition of the word ‘sex’).
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines sex as, “sex refers to the biological characteristics that define humans as female or male. While these sets of biological characteristics are not mutually exclusive, as there are individuals who possess both, they tend to differentiate humans as males and females.”
So I will carry on with the WHO definition in mind, even through the authors of the sustainable development goals (the UN) have declined to author and post a definition of ‘sex’ at all because they have chosen to use gender-identity as their goal-post. Their lack of precision makes it impossible to define what a girl or a woman is to them in this ‘modern’ age.
Amnesty International defines the problem; “In many countries, in all regions of the world, laws, policies, customs and beliefs exist that deny women and girls their rights.” They follow with “women cannot dress as they like… work at night… or take out a loan without their husband’s signature.” Amnesty International also notes that women have little or no control over divorce, property ownership, control over their own body, nor protection from harassment.
The Economist noted in 2018 that there are some job women are forbidden, by law, to perform. These jobs include working with chemicals, working with hormones, and producing gas. Some jobs are restricted to women only at night, like transporting goods and/or passengers, installing electrical power, and generating electrical power.
In 2019, 28.8% of girls aged 7-14 worked an average of 20.9 hours a week in Egypt, one of the countries which has forbidden females from working with chemicals and hormones. 48% of Egyptian boys aged 7-14 worked an average of 18.6 hours a week. In 2016, an estimated 17.731% of Egyptian women were employed; however, by 2020 the estimate stood at 11.78%. Also in Egypt 63.42% of males in 2016, and 63.41% of males in 2020 were employed. In 2017 the government of Egypt, led by president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, set forward a plan called National Strategy for the Empowerment of Egyptian Women 2030. A major stumbling block to achieving greater employment for Egyptian females is the culture in the country. El-Sisi, a Moslem himself, plans on addressing these cultural barriers, including girls being married off at a young age, women’s inability to travel from one state to another, sexual assault, income disparities between sexes, welfare participation, and the time women spend on household and child rearing duties, as well as other issues. The culture of Egypt is formed predominantly by Sunni Moslems with 90% of the nation practicing Islam while between 8-10% claim to practice some sect of Christianity, mostly Coptic. It is also worth noting that el-Sisi is a dictator who will brutalize any opposition to his rule. Neither the cultural environment nor the nature of the government is conductive towards females working in Egypt, and the statistics reflect this fact.
Let’s spend a bit of time in Russia before concluding this target. The Economist article mentioned several paragraphs ago stated that women are forbidden to drive a train along with 455 other restrictions in 2018. In that same year, Russia’s female employment reached it’s highest point since 2000 with 59.811% of them holding a position. In 2020, the number shrunk slightly, to 58.43% of females over 15 and older were employed in Russia. A 2019 Moscow Times article noted that most of the restrictions on female labor were Soviet-era holdovers and goes on to state, “Russia currently prohibits women from holding 456 jobs in dozens of industries that involve physically strenuous tasks or harmful working conditions. Previous media reports suggested that the Labor Ministry had slashed the list of prohibited jobs down to 98 under reforms set to be enacted in 2021.” The end of the article notes, “Women earn on average 30 percent less than men in Russia. Public polling says that gender-based roles and functions still dominate Russian society.” In RT, “Valery Korzh, a high ranked Labor Ministry official ” said “The authorities will keep reducing this list until only the professions that endanger women’s reproductive abilities remain on it[.]”
Just to point out my bewilderment at trying to assess this goal or even how to go about it, the reduction in the number of jobs Russian females are not permitted to perform is not enough progress for some. These jobs include some that select women could do but are banned from including those positions, “with especially harsh physical load[...]. This includes firefighting, mining, diving as well as repairing steam boilers and stoves, among other things.” A very confused male, ‘Anna,’ which decided to undergo a transition to a female was fired from its job manufacturing printing plates for candy wrappers in 2017. In 2019 the abomination won its court case against its former employer. Human Rights Watch, the author of this Anna article, proves itself an amoral and biologically-inept institution which refuses to recognize reality, finishing the article with, “Instead of misusing the law to keep women out of certain professions, Russian authorities should focus their attention on gender based discrimination like the wage gaps women in Russia face despite being, on average, better educated and healthier than men. Whether prohibiting women from doing 456 jobs, 100, or one, denying women equality in their choice of profession has no place in a legal system.” The Anti-Discrimination Center also rallies their rabid morons to the cause of demanding Russia drops all restrictions on female labor, “There can be no state ban on particular type of work based on sex. ‘The List of hard types of work’ puts a ban on some professions for all women, regardless of their own will.”
I don’t personally think that women should be involved with combat positions in the military unless the same metrics are maintained for females as are for males. But the metrics have been reduced to accommodate the physically weaker sex. I don’t think that trans-sexual people are anything but an abomination towards God, yet, I don’t hate them, I feel pity for them that their most pressing issue is what is in between their legs. They don’t deserve awards, they deserve condemnation; they shouldn’t be given medals in sporting competitions, they should be banned from competing in the other gender’s sporting contests; they should not be accepted for who they are, but reprimanded for the abomination they have chosen to identify as to go against God their Creator. There are roles in the Bible dedicated to men and women – men are to do the fighting and the earning while women are to rear the children and, maintain the household – the way God intended. The invention of ‘women must be given the right to work,’ indeed, prodded, and at times forced, to work, due to economic conditions within the households of virtually every western nation is abomination. The result of the feminist movement and the UN and governmental regulations to embrace feminist ideals has led to nothing but the complete destruction of gender roles and the nuclear family which relies on those gender roles. It is astonishing that women bought this anti-human garbage from third and fourth-wave feminist movements, but even more astonishing are the nuclear families still intact after these attacks. Any woman providing for her children with a working husband – major kudos to your family.
Is there discrimination between the sexes? Absolutely. Is it all unjustified? Not all of it. If I had a wife and she wanted to work in a Round-Up manufacturing plant, I would have to say absolutely not. My reasoning would be that Round-Up isn’t healthy for life and that there is no reason for a woman to expose a child, even potentially, to the crippling effects of Monsanto’s chemicals on the womb. That sounds exactly like what the Russians are going for. It sounds... PRACTICAL. Maybe all of these Western nations should think about the practicalities of fertile women working in environments which can cause all sorts of sterility, child abnormalities, and miscarriages….
“5.2 Eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls in the public and private spheres, including trafficking and sexual and other types of exploitation[.]”
It is absolutely disturbing that UN only includes females over 15 in this goal’s indicators. I guess they think a 10 year old girl who suffers from this same type of violence is just fine. I’ll come back when I finish puking.
Okay, I brushed my teeth and used mouthwash. UN Women estimated in 2018 that 30% of women, globally, “have been subjected to physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence, non-partner sexual violence, or both at least once in their life (30 per cent of women aged 15 and older).” They estimate that 26% of women 15 and older are victims of current or former husbands, or former sexual partners. An estimated 24% of 15-19 year old girls, “have experienced physical and/or sexual violence from an intimate partner or husband.” In 2018, an estimated 13% of women 15-49 years old suffered physical and/or sexual violence from an “intimate partner or husband” within the year prior which UN Women suspects increased during the COVID scamdemic mitigation efforts. UN Women notes that there is a skewing of their estimates due to their determination that 37% of of these violent events occur to women 15-49 years-old over these women’s lifetimes in Least Developed Countries. UN Women finish their diatribe against men by stating that an estimated 47,000 women and girls were killed by the hand of their lover or a family member in 2020. Family member can be female family members as well as males. However, in many cultures, girls are a burden to the family as they require dowry's to be wed and are looked at as unredeemable, deflowered, and impure if they have had sexual relations, consensual or not, prior to marriage.
Want to fix this? Have prosecutions for men who abuse women. Make the consequences harsh, like convicted rapists whether – anally, vaginally, orally, or by proxy – is met by the death penalty. But also, make rape convictions more that a she-said, he-said ordeal. But in a lot of these cases, the he-said, she-said is all that there is. The only real alternative to he-said, she-said is for police to crack down on reports of domestic violence, especially those involving sexual violence from any intimate partner. Any report, in any any nation, of any type of sexual assault should be legally met with at least restraining orders against the accused, and accusing parties, and either of their their affiliates, from having any contact with the opposing side at a minimum. Also, any woman who obviously claims sexual assault fraudulently should be dealt with harshly, maybe a 10 year prison sentence would suffice.
The Bible offers answers to this, superior to my suggestions, in Deuteronomy 22:23-28 -
“23 “If a girl who is a virgin is engaged to a man, and another man comes upon her in the town and has sexual relations with her; 24 you are to bring them both out to the gate of the city and stone them to death — the girl because she didn’t cry out for help, there in the city, and the man because he has humiliated his neighbor’s wife. In this way you will put an end to such wickedness among you. 25 “But if the man comes upon the engaged girl out in the countryside, and the man grabs her and has sexual relations with her, then only the man who had intercourse with her is to die. 26 You will do nothing to the girl, because she has done nothing deserving of death. The situation is like the case of the man who attacks his neighbor and kills him. 27 For he found her in the countryside, and the engaged girl cried out, but there was no one to save her. 28 “If a man comes upon a girl who is a virgin but who is not engaged, and he grabs her and has sexual relations with her, and they are caught in the act, 29 then the man who had intercourse with her must give to the girl’s father one-and-a-quarter pounds of silver shekels, and she will become his wife, because he humiliated her; he may not divorce her as long as he lives.”
Apart from that is a surveillance camera covering every domicile in the world. That’s the UN/global government goal – total surveillance of every individual on earth.
As far as trafficked girls and women, the American Psychological Association (APA) places the causation squarely on economic concerns. The APA’s proposed policy recommendations include making prostitution legal and attempting to convince justice systems to see prostitutes as victims rather than criminals, supporting the trafficked while they are in transition, supporting collaboration between state and federal officials, collecting data on the trafficked, research efforts, and humanitarian efforts.
Being as I live in the United States, I want to take a look at the open southern border which allowed millions of people into the United States in 2021 alone. Just about all of these people, regardless of their country of origin, have been forced to pay, or promise to pay, one of several Mexican trafficking gangs. The people coming over the border are slaves; sexually, economically, and literally. Being as the UN has no desire to preserve national borders, it’s asinine that they even comment on people moving over national borders, legally or illegally, yet they continuously do.
The United Nations cannot actually be serious when they claim to want to end the trafficking and sexual abuse of women and girls. Very few people cross the Mexico/US border without assistance from a coyote. Illegal immigrants are literally the slaves of these coyotes, and the gangs they work for. If the immigrant doesn’t do as told, they are killed. Some are not given water nor food. Trucks full of trafficked people in the trailer are found days after everyone inside is dead. In 2021, about 2 million illegal aliens from all over the world crossed the southern US border and were arrested. The vast majority of those arrested were released within the United States. The actual number of illegal border crossers in which the individuals ended up in the United States were far higher. If half of these people were women and girls, and the rate of being sexually assaulted was 10%, that’s 100,000 sexual assaults. The incidence of sexual assault has been estimated to be as high as 80% which would equate to 800,000 incidents of sexual assault.
And what do some of these people do when they are in the United States? In 2021 there were 488 criminal convictions of illegal aliens for sexual offenses. By March 15, 2022, there were 116 arrests of illegal aliens for sexual assault. On February 22, 2022 an article by Ben Dutka poked huge holes in the wisdom of New Jersey’s ‘safe harbor’ laws with a story about Francisco Barrera-Capistran. Capistran is facing three criminal charges: 1st degree aggravated sexual assault, second-degree sexual assault by contact, and second degree endangering the welfare of a child. Why was Capistran in the United States? Because he illegally crossed the border and wasn’t sent back home even if he was arrested to be released, illegally, into the United States.
“5.3 Eliminate all harmful practices, such as child, early and forced marriage and female genital mutilation[.]”
The United Nations Population Fund states that 20% of females under 18 are married, and in the least developed countries, 36% of females under 18 and 10% of females under 15 years-old are wedded off. Forced marriages, constitute those marriages in which one, or even both, of the parties do not consent to being married to one another.
UNICEF stated in 2018 that there were over 650 marriages in which the female was married before they reached their 18th birthday despite the rate decreasing to 21% in 2018 from 25% in 2008. They go on to point out that there was no region in the world which was on track to meet this target by 2030. In March 2021 UNICEF released their prediction that an additional 10 million girls will be at increased risk of being married through an arranged or forced marriage due to COVID-19 mitigation efforts (they blame the disease itself, of course).
The only way this goal is going to be reached is if the US kills anyone in a culture which embraces and engages in widespread arranged and/or forced marriages of girls under 18 years-old.
As far as female genital mutilation (FGM) goes, it seems to only really occur among Moslem populations, the higher the percentage of those practicing Islam, the higher the rates of FGM. Despite the stark realities of the FGM, it is overwhelmingly performed by Moslems; however, the UN, always eager to pacify any Satanic cult, attempts to pin the practice on Christians, Ethiopian Jews, and other African tribal groups so as to blame FGM’s causes on culture. I call BS. Anyone who mutilates a human reproductive organ intentionally is not Biblically justified to do so. But they do seem to have mandates under Islamic law.
If the UN wants to eradicate the practice, they will target the largest populations with the highest percentages of women and girls who have been forced to undergo the procedure. Targeting Mali (81%), Guinea (97%), Egypt (91%), and Somalia (98%) would seem prudent and effective, however, since the UN incorrectly attributes FGM to cultural issues, they will never solve the problem.
The UN estimated in February 2018 that there would be an overall global rise of FGM of 4.6 million women and girls by 2030. To show how dubious statistical information can be and how untrustworthy some publications can be, in the Guardian, BMJ Global Health conducted a survey which excluded every single female age group which has traditionally been included in studies of the prevalence of FGM to conclude that the northern African rates went from 57.7% in 1990 to 14.1% in 2015. In east African nations, their lies are even more apparent when BMJ concluded that the 1995 rate of 74.1% fell to 6% in 2016. The overall rates, measured in 15-49 year-olds gives a much clearer picture than the losers and fraudsters at the Guardian and BMJ Global Health are pushing.
But again, if the United Nations wants to actually end FGM, they are going to have to dramatically change the way that Islamic law operates and, because the law of Islam is part of the holy texts of Islam, the task will be left t o a decision over exterminating the ‘cultures’ perpetuating the practice or letting them be.
“5.4 Recognize and value unpaid care and domestic work through the provision of public services, infrastructure and social protection policies and the promotion of shared responsibility within the household and the family as nationally appropriate[.]”
The insane feminists at UN Women, who continuously and consistently decide to be the dumbest voice in the room: “Policies that provide services, social protection and basic infrastructure, promote sharing of domestic and care work between men and women, and create more paid jobs in the care economy, are urgently needed to accelerate progress on women’s economic empowerment.” UN Women is stating that their road map towards the destination of women’s empowerment as an express function of men’s dis-empowerment. They state that unpaid care work (raising children and looking after elderly family members) constitutes 10% of GDP and domestic work performed by women accounts to 39% f GDP.
The United Nation’s has attempted to accomplish this goal, in conjunction with several international bodies, national governments, several key local governments, and tens of thousands of lunatics operation thousands of NGO’s through several waves of feminism. Their collective goal actually appears in this book called The Communist Manifesto by this guy named Karl Marx, and that is the destruction of the nuclear family and religion in favor of acceptance and adherence of the omnipotent state. So, let’s see what the metrics for divorce rates and religious attendance look like.
In Psychology Today appeared an article in 2019 which claims that the divorce rate in the world stood at 2.6 divorces per 1,000 married persons in 1970 and rose to 5.5 divorces per 1,000 married people in 2008.
In the United States in 2000, 8.2 per 1,000 people were getting married, in 2015 it was 6.9 per 1,000, and in 2020 it was 5.1 per 1,000 people. Actually, the highest number of marriages in the United States between 2000 and 2020 was in 2001, at 2,326,000 while the lowest was in 2020 which came in at 1,676,911 marriages. The take away is that people are not getting married nearly as often in the first place in the United States. So, the divorce rate has, obviously fallen in correlation with this from 4 of 1,000 married people in 2000 to 3.1 per 1,000 people in 2015, to 2.3 per 1,000 people in 2020. The lowest number of divorces occurred in 2020 with 6130,505. It is worth noting that in 2020 the whole world lost it’s mind and stopped doing anything, including weddings, and timely court proceedings. These statistics do go to show that the United Nations is aiding in the destruction of the family.
According to Barna, 20% of US adults surveyed said they were non-Christian in 2000 while in 2020 the percentage stood at 32%. Christians who don’t attend services rose from 35% to 43% over the same period of time. Practicing Christians, those who have attended at least one church service within the month prior to being surveyed, declined from 45% in 2000 to 25% in 2018, 2019, and 2020.
Another poll of American’s church attendance put together by statistia.com in 2021 shows that 22% of Americans attend church services weekly; however, those who claim to attend a service at least once a month, almost every week, or weekly totals 42%. Those attending seldomly comes to 25%, while those who never attend total 31%.
More people in the United States are claiming they are atheists. “In the U.S., atheists are mostly men and are relatively young, according to the 2014 Religious Landscape Study. About seven-in-ten U.S. atheists are men (68%). The median age for atheists is 34, compared with 46 for all U.S. adults. Atheists also are more likely to be white (78% vs. 66% of the general public) and highly educated: About four-in-ten atheists (43%) have a college degree, compared with 27% of the general public. Self-identified atheists also tend to be aligned with the Democratic Party and with political liberalism. [italics mine]” This is literally the type of person the UN wants to spit out of colleges.
The United Nations will embrace just about anything which rejects religious ideas, and any belief in Jesus Christ or Yeshua in particularly. Humanism, the most pervasive and evil ideology ever invented by the Adversary (Satan), seeks to reject all objective reality and replace mankind with it. Humanism is the basis of the rationale at the United Nations, and all of their friends. According to Harvard’s Plurality Project; “Enlightenment principles and liberal religious movements shaped the Humanist worldview which prioritizes reason, scientific critique, civil freedoms, compassion, and pragmatic ethics. These non-religious guiding values form the center of a belief system that rejects the supernatural, reaffirms universal human dignity, and places trust in the ability of cooperative human effort to create a better future.” This quickly devolves into Satanism and human depravity towards their fellow man. Keep in mind, Harvard University itself was set up to educate clergy members in 1636, and in 1939 was given its name, after Rev. John Harvard. Yup, it was a Christian school – but no longer.
And it goes to show that the United Nations aim to destroy religion is on track. None of the 17 goals can be completed without destroying any belief that there is anything more important than the global governance system.
“5.5 Ensure women’s full and effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making in political, economic and public life[.]”
The number of women in governmental positions has increased between 2020 and 2021. While this target will not be achieved for several generations, the United Nations and their enablers are progressively making progress towards it’s fulfillment. Women heads of state and women in ministerial positions stood at all time highs in 2021. In the US, Biden’s stupid ass put women in charge of 46% of ministerial positions. Apparently these women are not qualified in their positions as the US has been in a multi-dimensional death spiral since Biden’s coup, which also saw a completely ineligible vice-president occupying the office. and, who happened to get into politics by providing sexual favors to a pervert already in politics.
Women entering into politics and entering predominantly male departments is not a slam dunk, however. On January 1, 2021, there was not a single woman to be found in the governments of Azerbaijan, Armenia, Brunei, North Korea, Papua New Guinea, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, Vietnam and Yemen. There is slow growth in the inclusion of women into finance and defense. Women dominate environmental, social affairs, women’s affairs, and gender equality positions within many governments.
The idiot feminazi’s at UN Women are, of course, freaking out and declaring the end of the world over these statistics. As UN Women are reaching for gender parity, they note that, globally, getting women to be in parity with men in parliamentary positions will not occur until 2063 at the present rates of increase, and that ministerial parity will not occur before 2077. Their solution of quotas is telling: “More than two-thirds of these countries have applied gender quotas—either legislated candidate quotas or reserved seats—opening space for women’s political participation in national parliaments.” And that, my reader, is the most sexist definition of sexist there is.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) notes that in 2002 there were 7 female CEO’s in the United States top 500 grossing companies. In 2021 the number was 41 and in 2022 the number was 74. The US is moving in the right direction for the UN’s agenda.
In 2020, the Global 500 businesses list had women listed as the CEO of the company only 13 times. The article this statistic was taken from is not about the 2.6% women leading the top 500 businesses in the world; it’s about how none of the 13 women are colored. In 2021, Forbes was ecstatic to report that people with vaginas held 23 of the CEO spots within the Global 500 business lists and that six of these women were women of color. Forbes is super sad in this article because the overall female CEO percentage is a miserable 4.6%.
In public life, it is dangerous. People are beaten for speaking out. They are arrested. They are murdered, sometimes by the government itself (there is a term, Arkancide, for the Clinton’s murder spree, may they burn in Hell forever). Many governments participate in murder due to political disagreement. Women are no different than men whether they are speaking out for legitimate women’s rights or for the ability for pedophiles to rape our children (which is a movement). As the UN and its affiliates condone activists continuously pushing further towards legalized pedophilia, the eating of non-animal proteins (they want you eating insect protein) and, eventually, the acceptance of cannibalism, they will continuously push for the silence of dissent even harder.
The WEF said, among other things: “[World Leaders] should take more measures to prevent and condemn verbal and physical attacks on women human rights defenders or political leaders and their families. [World Leaders] should also carve out greater and safer space for civil society, including women’s groups, to enable them to have a say in government policies affecting their lives.” Notice, only women are to be protected. It’s not the message which is to be protected, its the reduced cost of buying women to promote a choice cause the WEF wants promoted that motivates them.
“5.6 Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights as agreed in accordance with the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development and the Beijing Platform for Action and the outcome documents of their review conferences[.]”
The real goal of the UN is to kill people which is fully represented in this target. The murderous United Nations and NARAL and Planned Parenthood International and a host of others spend their days trying to convince women that their pregnancy should be aborted, I choose to call the procedure murder. The states of California and Maryland are currently trying to pass legislation which will allow medical ‘professionals’ and ‘parents’ to murder a child through neglect without consequence at up to 28 days after birth and potentially up to 365.24 days after birth, depending on the definition of perinatal. The United Nations loves the idea of death OUTSIDE of the womb. They want over 7 BILLION of us dead. The reason for this is that they want all the resources and they want all of us useless eaters to stop using them and the only way to achieve that goal is to sterilize and kill the vast majority of people currently upon this earth.
“5.a Undertake reforms to give women equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to ownership and control over land and other forms of property, financial services, inheritance and natural resources, in accordance with national laws[.]”
The United Nations doesn’t give one crap about any national laws. They HATE sovereign states, look at their treatment of SOVEREIGN Russia recently. They want a forceful removal of economic resources, access and control of land, other property, financial services, inheritance, and natural resources from men, to be given to women. The UN recognizes that men fight. Men will slowly recognize that equal rights, as explained in this target, will not be equal; it will mean that a never ending onslaught against the rights of a person with a penis will be waged for the benefit of those without a penis. What will the result be? Animosity between the sexes and a further reduced birth rate. It’s depopulation by ‘choice’ of the participants.
“5.b Enhance the use of enabling technology, in particular information and communications technology, to promote the empowerment of women[.]”
The indicator for this target is cell phone ownership by sex. It is rare to bump into anyone these days, at least where I have been in the United States, who does not own a cell phone. Most of them are smart phones. In advanced economies in 2020, cell phone ownership was at 94% and smart phones made up 76% of that total; only 6% of the populations in these countries did not own a cell phone. In emerging economies those numbers stood at 78%, 45%, and 17%, respectively.
The differences between men and women whom own smartphones is under 10% in most places included in Pew’s research, and has remained stable. India, however; has a gender disparity which has grown and 19% more men own smartphones than women.
On the United Nation’s SDG Indicator website, the map shows that most countries have not reported data, including the US, Germany, China, India, and just about all of Africa. Of those nations that did, South Korea, Malaysia, Italy, Morocco, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, and Serbia all reported more than 86.76% of their women own a cell phone. No country which reported had a rate less than 50%.
GSMA released a report in 2019 which stated that 80% of women in low and middle income countries own a cell phone and 48% use the internet. The same report notes that women are 10% less likely than men to own a cell phone, representing 197 million women who don’t own a cell phone. In south Asia, like India and several other nations, the gap between male and female cell phone ownership was 28% and the internet-usage disparity was 58%. GSMA documented that affordability, literacy and skills, safety and security, and relevance are the barriers which prevent women from owning a cell phone in low and middle income countries. Women who know about the internet access included with their mobile phones, according to GSMA, don’t use it for the same reasons. Global System for Mobile Communications (GSMA) then comes out and calls for increased female usage of the internet to reduce the 17% difference in internet spending between men and women. Closing the gap would result in $170 billion in extra revenue to the mobile industry and $700 billion in GDP growth in the nations women don’t sufficiently utilize their phones’ internet capabilities.
This target and indicator is very illuminating. It shows that despite having the technology in their hands, women are not using their devices as the UN wants so more must be done. That thing to be done is to enrich the already rich.
“5.c Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation for the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at all levels[.]”
I have a question and an answer before I try to tackle this one. It kind of goes back to me confusion at the very start of this article. The question is what counts as a woman? Is it a man, penis still intact, who identifies as a women and enters female MMA competitions and causes skull fractures in the biological female he is fighting against? Is the UN referring to only biological females when addressing ‘gender equality’? What is a ‘man’ who was once a female?
My answer is that the United Nations wants to stand with the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersexed (LGBTQI), so I will use this definition to attempt to answer the progress this target has made. That said, I refuse to accept anyone else’s fantasy land, call them by a pronoun other than he/him if they are males or she/her if they are females. To Hell with anything else, the only way to win at this game of sexual delusion is to not play. If that makes that person angry, oh well.
In the UK, legislation was passed in 2010 addressing disparities between biological males and biological females. It includes civil penalties, including for hurt feelings. Those merely thinking about sexual reassignment, no drugs or surgeries needed, are covered in the UK’s abominable Equality Act of 2010.
In the United States, there is something called the 1964 Civil Rights Act which did a lot of things to further equality in race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. Any official policy at any level of government was supposed to be immediately voided where such policy or legislation created segregation in public areas or barred any protected class from employment. Those with a disability (which has been forever expanded and is actually part of the rationale of including adults wishing to sexually groom a 1st grade class as viable candidates for teaching the class) were legislatively added to the protected class in 1990 with the American’s with Disabilities Act. There is a family shredding and religion dismantling piece of legislation called the Equality Act which is currently proceeding through the US Senate and will no doubt be passed into law by the criminal elements within the national legislative and executive branches of the US. Hopefully the Supreme Court will rule it unconstitutional, but I will not hold my breath.
Part of my problem with the Equality Act is the sheer duplicity upon which it’s anti-God, anti-family, anti-woman, anti-child proponents rely on to build support. From the National Center for Transgender Equality; “Federal nondiscrimination laws covering public accommodations cover only race, color, religion, national origin, and disability. Federal law does not prohibit discrimination based on sex, gender identity or sexual orientation in public accommodations.” While that is true, the real truth is that we do not need a federal public accommodations law for any of these groups, including sex, which is why sex was not included in the 1964 legislation in the first place. What these pedophiles in LGBT clothes want is fully grown men jerking off in the women’s locker room at the local gym. What should be done is a comprehensive ban on males from entering female restrooms and comprehensive ban on biological males from competing against women in sporting events. Make the breaking of these bans felonies. Instead we are all lambasted for suggesting such a thing. The tactic is to make those of us with two brain cells to rub together shut up while the freaks run around demanding we accept them (which will be followed with coerced celebration of them) and their law which is a ‘solution’ to a problem that doesn’t exist which will create problems for every institution which brought the US greatness.
I don’t usually agree with the Politburo in China, but I did on this issue. Transgenders in China, at least in 2017, were treated as suffering from a mental illness according to Amnesty International. China has a problem with the the European Union’s Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) Unit.
Everyone should have a problem with any recommendation the EU’s SOGI Unit makes as it is proud of promoting it’s aims through children. That makes SOGI an official institution which not only condones, but openly promotes, the sexualization of children. My analysis of SOGI is a far harsher indictment, institutionalized pedophilia.
Globally, there are protections against discrimination due to sexual orientation (including gender dysphoria) constitutionally in 11 countries, broadly (but not constitutionally) in 57, against barriers to employment in 81 countries, and 7 countries have uneven or limited protections. Most of the world is not buying this hallucination, however; in 43 countries LGBTQI practitioners are not seen as criminals but have no protections either, in 2 countries it is de facto criminally engaged in, 30 countries will put people in prison for up to 8 years, 27 countries offer 10 years to life for practicing LGBTQI, and there are 11 countries in which the death penalty is a possibility.
The biggest issue facing women being empowered in the West is transsexualism which is something the UN wants the world to protect. The biggest issue in the rest of the world is gender roles (notice I did not use the word stereotype). As with other targets, the only way the UN will achieve this goal is through dictatorial edicts backed by force of arms, i.e. mass murdering those with traditional beliefs in gender-roles and cultural and religious beliefs ‘preventing’ women from ‘empowering’ themselves.
Summary
The UN will never stop trying to destroy the family. The UN will never stop trying to marginalize religious belief, especially if that belief involves Jesus. The UN does not have enough time (less than 8 years) to completely destroy all families and all religious beliefs. The only way they will meet their targets by 2030 with out killing everyone outright would be mass hypnosis which will not work on everyone, but will work on enough people to force compliance from those not hypnotized. If the non-hypnotized still refuse to fall in line, they can just be marginalized to the fringes of polite society. If that doesn’t work, they can be jailed. And if that still doesn’t get the ‘misaligned’ into compliance with the global technocratic elite’s agenda, a few could just be murdered openly. The ‘aligned’ will cheer at these crackdowns on dissent, because of their own technocratically-installed fear.
What better way is there to accomplish this than cause a massive global panic (COVID-19) and introduce a gene-therapy (vaccine) requiring a never-ending addition of booster shots which will eventually kill everyone who takes it? When the aligned start getting this tactic, change the ploy to unabridged nuclear war. When the nuclear war fails to eliminate everyone, claim anthropomorphic climate change demands adherence to the technocratic plot. When the survivors of all of that start to see that climate-mitigation efforts (in a nuclear war, man really may have harmed the climate of earth permanently and irrevocably) are ineffective if not harmful to the earth the technocrats could just decide to get it over with and release something like human-infecting mousepox or Marburg virus upon the world. Maybe they will decide to do end the ‘useless eater’ problem in a regional and cultural way, tainting rice with cyanide, or infusing wheat with anthrax, or making GMO corn include DNA-altering chemicals, nanoparticles, or strychnine.
Wake up now! There is no later.
Open a Bible and read it. May God Bless You.
All quotes were found on 3/22/2022 at https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal5 unless otherwise documented.