How are the UN Sustainability Goals Going? Goal 11 of 17.

Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity

5/2/2022

The seventeen United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the goals of the Great Reset. The SDGs were adopted in 2015 by United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The cover for the SDGs were that they would provide relief for disabled peoples by 2030 according to Agenda 2030. To fully understand Agenda 2030, a review of Agenda 21 should be undertaken, which I will not do here. In this article I will focus on the 11th SDG:

Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable

My city has a sustainable development plan. Does your community have one of these awful things? You should absolutely go check to see. Recently, Sioux Falls, SD wrote an updated version of it. It never ceases to amaze me how little mention these documents get in the press when they are up for comment and how much havoc they will end up wreaking upon communities. On top of that, I’m in the US where we don’t have 5-year plans – but these types of documents are usually 5-10 year plans which are continuously monitored and updated. That’s how Marxist applications operate, and that doesn’t belong in the United States. The 10 targets for goal 11 are:

11.1 By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums

11.2 By 2030, provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems for all, improving road safety, notably by expanding public transport, with special attention to the needs of those in vulnerable situations, women, children, persons with disabilities and older persons

11.3 By 2030, enhance inclusive and sustainable urbanization and capacity for participatory, integrated and sustainable human settlement planning and management in all countries

11.4 Strengthen efforts to protect and safeguard the world’s cultural and natural heritage

11.5 By 2030, significantly reduce the number of deaths and the number of people affected and substantially decrease the direct economic losses relative to global gross domestic product caused by disasters, including water-related disasters, with a focus on protecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations

11.6 Reduce the environmental impacts of cities

11.7 By 2030, provide universal access to safe, inclusive and accessible, green and public spaces, in particular for women and children, older persons and persons with disabilities

11.a Support positive economic, social and environmental links between urban, per-urban and rural areas by strengthening national and regional development planning

11.b By 2020, substantially increase the number of cities and human settlements adopting and implementing integrated policies and plans towards inclusion, resource efficiency, mitigation and adaptation to climate change, resilience to disasters, and develop and implement, in line with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, holistic disaster risk management at all levels

11.c Support least developed countries, including through financial and technical assistance, in building sustainable and resilient buildings utilizing local materials”

I’m going to cover these one by one.

11.1 By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums[.]”

The UN tracks this goal by seeing how many people live in slums. Between 2014 and 2018 people living in slums worldwide shrank from 29.63% to 29.24%. This represents a reduction in the progress being made prior to 2014 to get people out of living in slums, which is defined as, “a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water, access to improved sanitation, sufficient living area, and durability of housing.”

I have yet to see a sustainability plan within the United States which does not incorporate affordable housing. The newest draft in Sioux Falls, South Dakota included this and one of the mayoral candidates emphasized this as a central tenet of their campaign. The MET Council’s (Minneapolis, MN and surrounding areas) Thrive 2040 plan included it. Basically, people living in slums are homeless but decided to set up some form of ramshackle semi-permanent residence. In the United States, people very rarely do that.

California has the largest population of homeless people in the US – 151,278. While California has the most homeless, it also has the third highest price of living in the US, exacerbating the issue. California has also taken on such measures as banning wood-fire stoves, water allotments, and will be banning all gasoline engines. California is the UN’s version of what the US should look like – homeless in the streets, slums everywhere, drug use, open defication, and strict environmental policies and laws aimed at prohibiting individuals and families from adequately heating, cooking, and being able to use water. If there is no slum, the places that adopt the UN SDGs will create them, and California is a good example.

In Least Developed Countries 58.88% of people lived in slums in 2018 which is a slight decrease from 2016, but still an untenable situation. If the UN were serious about addressing this they would take their extorted money to make sure that slum residences were transformed into durable structures with water and sanitation accessibility and were large enough for the occupants to dwell in, and, if the UN were really serious, advocate for these structures to be electrified. But the UN is not really all that interested in that – they are much more interested in California’s water allotment schemes, wood-burning stoves ban, and upcoming ban of all gasoline engines. It’s all about the climate (Gaia), not people, with the UN.

11.2 By 2030, provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems for all, improving road safety, notably by expanding public transport, with special attention to the needs of those in vulnerable situations, women, children, persons with disabilities and older persons[.]”

The UN has, thus far, been unable to track people having access to public transportation. So, I will give it my best effort. The types of transportation which are considered sustainable include, electric buses, fuel or diesel and electric hybrid vehicles, electric light rail, rapid-transit and high speed rail, biodiesel, ethanol, compressed natural gas, and biogas, bus rapid transit, and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.

What is clear, despite any statistics which are available, is that every sustainability plan which comes out to dictate what is going to happen to the local citizens in that town, city, or state, this idea is always included. If you read any of these documents, you will read about the need for expanded capacity for public transportation. You will read about the need for increased usage of public transportation. The draft sustainability plan in Sioux Falls, SD, which is just about to be implemented, actually promises that there will be far fewer individual automobiles in the near future and if any of us, the citizens, don’t like that we can ride a bike. The wind never stops blowing and I’ve personally experienced two blizzards, a couple of very violent thunderstorms, and temperatures ranging from -26oF to 102oF. I certainly don’t want to be out in any of that, and I certainly don’t want to use public transportation – and I won’t.

11.3 By 2030, enhance inclusive and sustainable urbanization and capacity for participatory, integrated and sustainable human settlement planning and management in all countries[.]”

Once again, the UN cannot be bothered to track their own target. It is beyond the UN to gather the data to figure out “the ‘ratio of land consumption rate to population growth rate,’” nor “the ‘proportion of cities with a direct participation structure of civil society in urban planning and management that operate regularly and democratically.’”

Everywhere, it seems, has one, or multiple organizations which serve to implement this. In Sioux Falls, the city council and mayor have decided that college students, business interests, and five citizens on board with these types of designs, are the civil society they need to listen to. There are 23 people on the steering committee regarding sustainability in Sioux Falls.

Now, if some entity wanted to go around messy elections and oath’s of office how would that entity do that? Convince the elected officials to commission something like an unelected sustainability steering committee which will push out draconian 5-year plans with advice like go ride a bike when it is -10 degrees out with a 40 mph wind. Electing the mayor and the city council out won’t get rid of the cancer, it will only replace those who control the committee. The result is that, citizens are not represented, even at the local level, and the people on these types of unelected boards seem to have taken an oath to the United Nations to effect widespread misery, deprivation, shortage, and death in line with the SDGs.

How do we get rid of unelected boards shoving Communist 5-year plans down the throats of an unsuspecting citizenry? We start putting the question on the ballots whether or not we should continue on with theses types of committees. We call the mayor and city council members and politely demand that these types of committees be disbanded, through ordinance or statute, immediately.

If we, as concerned citizens, fail to take action against the existence of local, unelected, power hungry, committees, boards, councils, etc…, then we will end up with the Wildlands project goals being implemented and a reality. Basically there will be thoroughfares created, called wildlife or environmental corridors, which are completely off limits from any human activity. Maps of this plan indicate that about half of the United States would be deemed off limits due to the institution of the plan.

The United States would quickly become a land of city-states. Permission to travel from one city to another would need to be granted by a governmental authority. There would be no little towns scattered about the country side. There would be intersecting wildlife corridors all over the place. A few generations of doing this would result in fracturing any type of extended families and allow individual city-states to rule their subjects with an iron fist, decreeing whatever they desired whenever they desired it. Non-conformity will not be tolerated in such a society.

11.4 Strengthen efforts to protect and safeguard the world’s cultural and natural heritage[.]”

When target 11.3 is paired with 11.4 the idea that human activity is acceptable in even fewer places. The difference between Wildlife corridors and Cultural Heritage Sites is that humans can visit the Cultural Heritage Sites in most cases.

The Cultural Heritage Sites in the US which are subject to UNESCO’s jurisdiction are architecture designed by Frank Lloyd Wright (8 of them in different locations), Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site (IL), Carlsbad Caverns National Park (NM), Chako Culture National Historical Park (NM), Everglades National Park (FL), Grand Canyon National Park (CO), Great Smoky Mountains National Park (NC and TN), Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (HI), Independence Hall (PA), Kluane/Wrangell–Saint Elias National Park and Preserve/Glacier Bay/Tatshenshini–Alsek Wilderness Provincial Park (AK and BC, Canada), La Fortaleza and San Juan National Historic Site in Puerto Rico (PR), Mammoth Cave National Park (KY), Mesa Verde National Park (CO), Monticello and the University of Virginia in Charlottesville (VA), Monumental Earthworks of Poverty Point (LA), Olympia National Park (WA), Papahānaumokuākea (Near HI in the ocean), Redwood National and State Parks (CA), San Antonia Missions (TX), Statue of Liberty (NY), Taos Pueblo (NM), Waterton Glacer International Peace Park (MT, and Canada), Yellowstone National Park (WY, MT, and ID), and Yosemite National Park (CA).

It is a long list – 24 sites – covering well over 631 square miles. Around the world, there are hundreds of these sites. They are subject to all kinds of various laws, rules, and regulations from not only UNSECO but from park rangers and forestry officials. During COVID-19 many of these sites were completely shut off to the public, for example. A lot of these sites have multiple designations like biodiversity reserves.

This is a sovereignty-busting compact which seeks to grab as much land as possible. If there is no historical or cultural significance at the sites themselves, easements around the boundaries will sought. Additional sites are constantly being explored. Currently, there are 19 more sites which are listed as tentative to be included on the World Heritage List in the United States. Globally, there are a total of 1,154 sites already included and 1,737 tentative sites. These sites will eventually be permanently shut-off to the public and special permissions will be required to enter them. Many of these sites featured fully armed military, paramilitary, and security forces to make sure access to certain portions of these sites remain off limits – such as the caves lying at the base of the Grand Canyon.

11.5 By 2030, significantly reduce the number of deaths and the number of people affected and substantially decrease the direct economic losses relative to global gross domestic product caused by disasters, including water-related disasters, with a focus on protecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations[.]”

In 2008 there were 38.24 million internal displacements and in 2020 the number had fallen to 30.69 million. Not mentioned here is how many of the displaced were able to return home. And this only covers new displacements those already displaced at an earlier date are not counted.

The Marshall Islands and Togo somehow managed to have a ratio per 100,000 people affected by disasters exceeding 100,000 people; 106,697.02 and 100,599.97, respectively, in 2020. Seven other nations recorded over 12,000 per 100,000 in 2020.

In 2020 Togo reported that 1.03 people per 100,000 died or were missing due to disasters. Also in 2020, the Marshall Islands reported a rate of 1.88 per 100,000 missing or deceased due to disasters. Three countries, Iraq (2018), Slovenia (2020), and Armenia (2020) had over 100 people per 100,000 killed or missing because of disasters; 249.5, 138.7, and 110.96, respectively.

No one at the United Nations, a national government, an international non-governmental-organization, or anyone else can stop natural disasters. Trying to link natural disasters to driving cars and producing electricity by burning gas or coal is, in essence, stating that mankind can overpower the sun’s effects upon the earth. Maybe mankind can geoengineer and terraform the earth. The ways thhis can be accomplished is not because of humanity’s usage of cars or electricity production – it is because of weather modification programs like stratospheric aerosolized injection (SAI), overstimulating the ionosphere and other layers of the atmosphere, and detonating nuclear weapons, especially in the upper atmosphere. Space shuttles exiting to and returning from space actually leave holes in the earth’s atmosphere for a time. Operating gasoline engines isn’t causing earthquakes, but messing with the ionosphere can. Burning coal and then filtering the bad particles out, like lead and sulfur, isn’t going to create acid rain but SAI using sulfur will. Getting nuclear powered electricity isn’t going to spew alpha and beta particles around the world if they are operated correctly, but it is a guarantee that some of the materials released in high-altitude nuclear tests is resting in the soil and waters around the globe.

Those issues are never addressed by the people at the UN. They want global austerity and are disingenuously using disaster mitigation as the vehicle to make it difficult to argue against. That ploy is done on purpose. The whole target is a ruse in which the UN will claim that anyone making arguments along the lines presented here are the ones who are labeled as whack-jobs and pro-death. Well, I’m neither of those labels – I want everyone on earth to be able to live of their own free-will granted to them by God, including being free of being affected by disasters. All I’m saying here is that the UN is lying through their teeth when they claim to care about any of this, being as though the UN and their friends are the same people who have determined that God created a flawed system (He did not) and that they can ‘fix’ it.

In the economic realm, economic losses relative to GDP totaled 0.1% of Cameroon’s GDP in 2019, the highest rate in the world. That number equates to $39,670,000.* The second nation on the list, Vanuatu, lost 0.07% in 2018 which equates to $640,309.54.* Burundi, at 0.05% in 2018, lost $1.335 million.* Over a decade ago, in 2009, Samoa lost 0.05% which means $292,353.01.* Fifth on the list is Sudan which lost 0.04% in 2019, or $1,046,400.* The GDP base in these countries is very low, meaning the statistics are not really that reflective of the real situation. In 2019 the United States reported less than 0.01% losses which totals (at 0.009%) $192,870,000.*

In 2005, a full half of a percent of global GDP was lost due to disasters. $47.78 trillion was the GDP in 2005 and 0.5% equals $238.9 billion.* In 2017, 0.43% was lost, which is $349.246 billion.* 2015 represents the highest point and 2017 represents the most recent, and also the fourth highest percentage since 1995. To put this all in perspective, COVID-19’s disastrous mitigation efforts cost a 3% reduction in overall global GDP equating to trillions of dollars and it was all orchestrated by evil, demonically inspired and demonically sympathetic men and women in positions of trust.

Insurers, reinsurers, and risk-management firms Munich Re (Germany) and Aon Benfield (Britain) point at weather disasters rising. Both firms reported in 2017 that worldwide weather-related disaster losses accounted for 0.40% as a share of GDP.

The UN is trying to state that everyone needs to move to the cities, and that there are major weather events which affect those places. They are taking water-related disasters specifically into account because cities have waterways. Most of the largest cities are arranged around oceans and coastlines. Some are arranged around navigable rivers or lakes which access to the oceans of the world. Humanity is, not surprisingly, organized geographically, in part, due to access to water. Tsunamis, hurricanes, typhoons, and floods have always been a threat in certain areas. As more and more economic value is added in cities in areas which are afflicted by such events, the economic damage and death tolls will reach higher and higher totals when those events present themselves severely.

Tornadoes are an ever-present threat in the US and Canadian plains. While they do not usually directly strike places such as Chicago, St. Louis, or Oklahoma City, the possibility does exist. Taking out even one-tenth of a major metropolitan area in the US or Canada would quickly add up into the hundreds of billions of dollars. Hurricane Sandy caused $62 billion in damage. Hurricane Katrina, which left a still lingering economic impact in Louisiana and Mississippi, is estimated to have cost $100-$150 billion in damages.

Imagine what the consequences will be if and when there is an earthquake in Shanghai, China or a wildfire in Mexico City, Mexico, a flood in Melbourne, Australia, or a drought in Buenos Aries, Argentina. The devastation which will be wrought should the Cascadia Subduction Zone have a massive earthquake and a resultant tsunami would be horrifying as it would have the potential to wipe out the coastline of all of Washington state (Seattle), Vancouver in Canada, Oregon (Portland), and a good chunk of the Northern Californian coast line. If the focal point of the tsunami struck Seattle and Vancouver the costs could be in the millions of lives and in the trillions of dollars. The same holds true for multiple other potential events like the possibility of an ocean-wide tsunami slamming into the east coast of the United States, the UK, Ireland, Spain, and multiple regions in Africa should one, or multiple, Canary Islands be so affected by an earthquake or volcanic event.

In the last 7 days 4/23-4/30 2022 there were 87 earthquakes in the world measuring over 4.5 magnitude according to the USGS, most of which occurred in the Ring of Fire. 566 magnitude 4.5 and greater earthquakes have occurred in the last 30 days, the most potent of which was a magnitude 6.7 just off the coast of Nicaragua. In total the region has experienced 7 earthquakes of 4.5 or greater over the last 30 days including a 5.3M and 5.4M. The Loyalty Islands were hit with 38 4.5M+ quakes over the last 30 days, 6.4 the most violent.

11.6 Reduce the environmental impacts of cities[.]”

Painting all of the buildings and roads white, using electric cars exclusively, water rationing, electricity rationing, rooftop gardens, smart meters, abolishing individual transportation, and smart cities have all been proposed, and at times implemented to accomplish this demonic target. The UN, in its typical deceptive fashion, has decided to only indicate solid waste disposal and air pollution in the tracking of this target. The UN doesn’t want anyone smelling the rotting fish bucket lurking behind this target – a panoptoconic surveillance state measuring every individuals social credit score in live time. In other words, this target represents a path towards creating an open air prison system.

According to the UN and their friends at Our World In Data in 2017 Australia and New Zealand they dispose of 94% of their solid waste in cities adequately. Europe and North America are at 89.6%, Latin America and the Caribbean 80.4%, Northern Africa and Western Asia 73.5%, Eastern and South Eastern Asia 72%, Central and Southern Asia 66.7%, and Sub-Saharan Africa took adequate care of solid waste coming from cities 43.4% of the time.

Oh boy are there are nut jobs out there. This blog, which I happened to stumble on to, written on July 19, 2021, says several things about solid waste in Africa. In the blog, the author notes that Africa collects only 55% of garbage, 90% of that goes to uncontrolled landfills, is often burnt, and 13% constitutes plastics, while 57% is organic waste. The authors partial solution to this, of course, is to convert organic wastes to fertilizer; however, some of that waste is human feces which, given the rates at which Africans are afflicted by diseases spread by feces makes the suggestion sound like an extremely bad, if not reckless, idea. “The bulk of organic waste is currently being dumped in landfills. However, organic waste could provide significant socio-economic opportunities for African countries.” The author fails to mention the disease spread through human beings through the vector of feces and does not mention the treatment processes needed to get rid of such contaminants as schistosomiasis or anti-depressants.

The author of the blog then goes on to blame plastics and chemicals leeching into water sources as the cause of “autism, asthma, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), obesity, diabetes, and various congenital disabilities.” The author can only make this claim by failing to mention the advent of vaccinations as well as genetically modified food, although the author does point at the endocrine disrupters caused by this leeching and the associated reproductive issues the cause (low sperm count, deformations, genetic abnormalities, sterility).

I used this blog to prove a point. The author wants to rail against the producers of all chemicals, all plastics, and demand the reader ascribe to the idea that those two producers are the only problems. Those two industries, according to the author, are responsible for all of the ailments listed above as well as a decrease in health of humans overall and the cause of environmental degradation. The way to fix this is to stop making plastics and chemicals. Using plastics and chemicals is not the right way to mitigate the potential harmful effects they can produce; however. Disposing of such substances properly is the key here.

Reader, please do not think that I approve of all of the chemicals that exist, because I don’t, and I really do think some of them should be immediately discontinued and cleaned up effectively. Prozac and Ritalin, for example, are something I see as the soma from Brave New World or the mandated cocktail demanded by authorities to be taken in THX-1138. Lets get those out of the water supply. Let’s actually clean the water and get all of the GMO proteins out of it, along with the lead. Let’s get rid of mandated vaccination routines for newborns – particularly the MMR and hepatitis vaccines. Let’s stop using GMO seeds, harsh chemical cocktails on our crops, and increase the CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere so we can increase food production without GMO garbage. Let’s encourage small farms – break up the foreign owned and/or corporate farms and encourage crop rotation, field rotation, and organic foods. If the source is organic the food will be a lot cleaner even if it is processed afterwards. None of that will ever occur – the UN, and all of their friends seek to destroy humanity’s DNA, God’s creation, and move into an age of transhumanism. We are all guinea pigs (Steve Quayle and Doug Hagmann call us lab rats – and they are correct).

Air pollution is made to seem more severe in nations because where there is power generation and industrial activity is usually within cities. There is a concentration of pollutants in those areas, especially if potential pollutants are not scrubbed out of the resultant expulsion of resultant materials. The UN measures this by spreading air pollution in cities across the entire nation. Also, please keep in mind, that CO2 release is usually counted as pollution (it is NOT), and there is a lot of talk, and the possible application of figuring water vapor into air pollution totals – WATER VAPOR.

According the UN, in 2017, the mean annual exposure to air pollutants of particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in size (measured by micrograms per cubic meter) found six nations over 87μg with Nepal at 99.73μg, followed by Niger, Qatar, India, Saudi Arabia, and Eqypt. With the exception of Nepal, which is almost entirely comprised inside of the highest mountain range on earth, the Hymilayas (as is Buhtan), all of these nations are located in or contain within their borders a desert, meaning there is silica dust floating around in the air. Silica can get stuck within a human being’s lungs and cause respiratory problems and deserts are also subject to sandstorms – massive walls of winds which whipped up loose sand particles as they sweep across the desert. For thousands of years the people inhabiting those lands have worn face coverings to protect themselves from the larger particulate matter in the desert, near the desert, and being blown in by sandstorms. It’s not a new thing, it’s a desert life thing – and it won’t stop a virus.

Bio Safety Level-4 (BSL-4) suits stop viruses and so do BSL-3 suits to an extent (not the ones the globalists hope kill the mass of humanity, like Ebola, or a chimeric Ebola-smallpox), proper immune systems stop viruses; and masks stop sand. About four years ago I could find BSL-4 suits for about $1,800 with the mask included. Today I cannot find a price, nor can I find a place to buy one from unless I e-mail the manufacturing company and I even searched it on Google.com just to see what happened – something I almost never resort to – and that search came up with nothing except over -sized suits. The last time I e-mailed a company for a price I ended up ordering a square yard of copper/silver infused fabric which ran $100 per square yard.

The UN will use anything – sand, Ebola, COVID-19, H2O and everything else to justify their position to define pollutants and contain them. They will especially seek to do this by seeking out airborne problems in major urban areas and present them as issues that affect the globe. The air pollution which is released by China is definitely a problem in the areas in which it is produced; however, it disperses in the atmosphere and oceans as it travels over the Pacific Ocean. And if this is a burden to the ecosystem, then, by the ‘laws’ of ‘evolution’ shouldn’t the organisms representing life just adapt to the incrementally changing chemical and mineral balance of the nutrients available in the oceans and atmosphere?

That’s an interesting question that puts transhumanists and evolutionists in between a rock and a hard place. If evolution is a law, and not a theory, which is what both groups present as their argument – shouldn’t whatever pollutants mankind has produced ensure a survival of the fittest of the most agile of all life forms? That would include the virus and the prion (which I would argue against being alive at all), bacteria, and single celled organisms. Shouldn’t those organisms have ‘evolved’? Indeed – some have ‘evolved,’ especially bacteria such as MRSA, drug resistant strains of Tuberculosis, and other bacterial infections with are no longer able to be treated by some classes of antibiotics. The ‘evolution’ of MRSA and other bacteriological-strains actually represents a loss of the bacteria’s genetic structure – they no longer have the receptors which will allow anti-bacteriological drugs to kill them. That isn’t bacterial evolution, its bacterial DE-evolution, and, given enough time, all bacteria which can infect mankind will be without receptors to anything – including the ability to perform both vital (positive) and disease-causing (negative) function within a human, animal, or plant biome. If humans continue to interfere with bacteria in such a way as we have been, bacteria may even lose their abilities outside of the bodies of life and cease to break down organic and inorganic materials, and where would that leave humanity? Dead. Good thing for the few human survivors (500 million, hmm) there are DNA banks to reconstitute the life giving bacteria, huh?

11.7 By 2030, provide universal access to safe, inclusive and accessible, green and public spaces, in particular for women and children, older persons and persons with disabilities[.]”

So, women WITH children are good to go into a park. So are older people, and disabled people. I’m a 44 year old man, so I guess I don’t qualify. I put groceries on the shelf for these groups, and others to buy – so I guess I’m not qualified to go to a park or green space. I labor so that these groups can infest parks with their stupidity and leave their garbage behind.

The first idiotic indicator the UN didn’t track for this target reads “average share of the built-up area of cities that is open space for public use for all, by sex, age and persons with disabilities.” Generally, parks are open to every single person regardless of sex, age, or disability. Granted, some disabilities may prevent individuals suffering from those debilitates access to the park (like those in mountains, mountain ranges, with steps, which have large groups of people [enochlophobia or agoraphobia], or those that disallow emotional support animals, among others). Park access is pretty much open to everyone except apparently me – because I am a middle-aged white male who works his behind off for far less than I’m worth to provide for service to those in my community. Not only do I not have the time to visit one of these parks because of paid work, or because I started a zero-income ‘business’ which will get me thrown into the Americanized global vision of a gulag for speaking my mind, but I don’t want to. This is going to sound really crass but, why would I want to leave my apartment with neighbors who are legitimately retarded or of foreign-born descent whom I cannot communicate with to go see more people who are retarded or of foreign-born descent whom I cannot communicate with? I can do all of that right here – all I need to do is go walk around my apartment copmlex! I don’t need a waterfall in the background to do that. But, one day I will go see the Sioux Falls attraction. And on that day I hope there are rational people there.

The other UN indicator for being able to access parks is, also not tracked. The indicator seeks, somewhat bizarrely, even though the target includes the term ‘safe,’ to measure the “proportion of persons victim of physical or sexual harassment, by sex, age, disability status and place of occurrence, in the previous 12 months.”

If I call a tranny trying to convert from a man to a women (another Godly abomination) a man, I very well may be included in this statistic if the incident occurred in a public space. It’s one of the reasons why I can go into any public space and not speak a word – for fear of being criminalized for something I muttered at a grocery store, or Target, or Walmart, or a public park. Honestly, I see no people worth speaking to – they are either completely wrapped up in their own world and will refuse to be challenged by the real world, or are retarded – and I don’t mean retarded to be mean, I mean they are retarded to the ideas I would present to them and would not or could not comprehend them.

I’m not going to deny that real violent acts occur in parks, public, and open spaces. Of course they do - look at the open spaces allowed while aboard the NTC subway. Better, go look at the violent attacks by larger stature people against smaller stature people in the NYC subway system. From the incidents I have seen, every victim has been a woman or diminutive male and has been attacked by a larger black male from behind. Why is this? People like the demonic assholes of the galaxy they are – Rachael Maddow, Don Lemmon, Brian Stelter, Al Sharpton, the entire Southern Poverty Law Center, and even entities within the ACLU (and the ACLU itself at times) – push the idea that whites are nothing, blacks are owed something by the whites, and getting that ‘something owed’ is worth any act of violence. In effect, it means that white people are able to be robbed, assaulted, raped, and even murdered with impunity as long as the perpetrator is non-white. The US Government itself has actually identified white, Christian, males as the biggest domestic threat in the US. If I were writing in 1840, my analytics would be no different save for the race perpetrating the crime.

Have you seen the video of the white girl walking with her boyfriend in Indiana telling BLM murderers thugs “All Lives Matter?” If you have not, you can go read about it here, and I will tell you, the BLM murdered her for saying that in 2020, in a park. Where is the UN? Supporting those racists in BLM who murdered this poor girl for uttering that completely truthful phrase, because, social equity? It’s more like the UN is endorsing murder as long as the murder is conducted in order to facilitate their Communist goals.

11.a Support positive economic, social and environmental links between urban, per-urban and rural areas by strengthening national and regional development planning[.]”

I’ve seen this plan four times. The first time I saw it was in Agenda 21. The second time was in Agenda 2030. The third was the Metropolitan Council’s (MET Council) Thrive 2040 Plan for the seven counties comprising and surrounding Minneapolis/Saint Paul. The last time I ran across one of these documents was about a month ago with the Sioux Falls Sustainability Plan.

The UN indicator for this target, “proportion of population living in cities that implement urban and regional development plans integrating population projections and resource needs, by size of city,” is measured as “countries that have national urban policies or regional development plans that respond to population dynamics; ensure balanced territorial development; and increase local fiscal space.”

156 countries in the world are mapped as having an affirmative to the metric measuring target 11.a. The notable ‘No’s’ to this metric are the United States and Russia. North Macedonia is the only fully European nation which is a no. Azerbaijan and North Korea are the Asian holdouts; however, being as though North Korea is an absolute Communist dictatorship, they have these types of plans but those plans are not meant to enrich anyone but the dictator and the dictator’s friends.

Why would any nation decided to go against such plans? The answer in the United States is that the federal government has no legal ability to enact such plans because of the divisions between state governments and the federal government. In the US, that has not stopped states and cities, acting independently of their state governments, from developing regional plans (MET Council) or city plans (Sioux Falls). While the United States gets a ‘no’ on this metric, the country by and large, has enacted some form of sustainable development plan on a state, regional, or city level. Why would they do this? Because copying and pasting sections of Agenda 21/2030 and SDG’s is very easy, does not require a great deal of thinking because the terminology sounds great on it’s face, and because these mayors, city councils, and governors want to virtue signal their willingness to capitulate to a global government.

If you have never read Agenda 21, I encourage you to do it. The plan is to organize society around mass-transit and to use total surveillance to measure compliance. Who needs snitches when someone idles their car in a parking lot when people have no cars? No snitch is needed if there is a leaky faucet which goes unfixed with a smart meter hooked up to it. Have an old refrigerator in the garage that is used to hold beer but takes too much energy – the technocrat will know that – and the beer drinker will experience brownouts and blackouts regularly. Garages will no longer need to be a thing by 205 though – everything will be ride sharing or public transportation – and each individual will be geo-fenced into the areas in which they are permitted to go. Woe to those leaving their areas. Woe to those mentioning, aloud, their desire to conduct themselves in an unapproved way – like taking a walk to the other side of town to go to their shopping market. I have a bleak outlook. The problem is that my bleak outlook is much rosier than the reality.

The countries which have garnered a no from the metrics of this UN target are still somewhat sovereign. The stupidity of governors and mayors which adopt sustainability schemes which agree with the terms the UN has set forth are criminals and are acting unconstitutionally. In my opinion they are committing treason by aiding and abetting an enemy. The fine folks at the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Defense which have decided to push UN SDG’s upon their agents to enforce are acting with treason as their motive and thinking that the world will save them from the likes of those who, correctly, address them as Benedict Arnold's.

11.b By 2020, substantially increase the number of cities and human settlements adopting and implementing integrated policies and plans towards inclusion, resource efficiency, mitigation and adaptation to climate change, resilience to disasters, and develop and implement, in line with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, holistic disaster risk management at all levels[.]”

The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk was adopted in 2015. In the Preamble, the UNISDR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction) stated in Article 5, “it is urgent and critical to anticipate, plan for and reduce disaster risk in order to more effectively protect persons, communities and countries, their livelihoods, health, cultural heritage, socioeconomic assets and ecosystems, and thus strengthen their resilience.”

Article 7 of the Preamble reads:

“Enhanced work to reduce exposure and vulnerability, thus preventing the creation of new disaster risks, and accountability for disaster risk creation are needed at all levels. More dedicated action needs to be focused on tackling underlying disaster risk drivers, such as the consequences of poverty and inequality, climate change and variability, unplanned and rapid urbanization, poor land management and compounding factors such as demographic change, weak institutional arrangements, non-risk-informed policies, lack of regulation and incentives for private disaster risk reduction investment, complex supply chains, limited availability of technology, unsustainable uses of natural resources, declining ecosystems, pandemics and epidemics. Moreover, it is necessary to continue strengthening good governance in disaster risk reduction strategies at the national, regional and global levels and improving preparedness and national coordination for disaster response, rehabilitation and reconstruction, and to use post-disaster recovery and reconstruction to “Build Back Better”, supported by strengthened modalities of international cooperation.”

Articles 12 and 13 of the Preamble goes:

“12 It is recalled that the outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, held in 2012, entitled “The future we want” called for disaster risk reduction and the building of resilience to disasters to be addressed with a renewed sense of urgency in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication and, as appropriate, to be integrated at all levels. The Conference also reaffirmed all the principles of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development [the Rio Declaration is Agenda 21].”

“13 Addressing climate change as one of the drivers of disaster risk, while respecting the mandate of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, represents an opportunity to reduce disaster risk in a meaningful and coherent manner throughout the interrelated intergovernmental processes.”

In Section II, Expected Outcome and Goal, is Article 18:

“To support the assessment of global progress in achieving the outcome and goal of the present Framework, seven global targets have been agreed. These targets will be measured at the global level and will be complemented by work to develop appropriate indicators. National targets and indicators will contribute to the achievement of the outcome and goal of the present Framework. The seven global targets are: (a) Substantially reduce global disaster mortality by 2030, aiming to lower the average per 100,000 global mortality rate in the decade 2020–2030 compared to the period 2005– 2015; (b) Substantially reduce the number of affected people globally by 2030, aiming to lower the average global figure per 100,000 in the decade 2020–2030 compared to the period 2005–2015;9 (c) Reduce direct disaster economic loss in relation to global gross domestic product (GDP) by 2030; (d) Substantially reduce disaster damage to critical infrastructure and disruption of basic services, among them health and educational facilities, including through developing their resilience by 2030; (e) Substantially increase the number of countries with national and local disaster risk reduction strategies by 2020; (f) Substantially enhance international cooperation to developing countries through adequate and sustainable support to complement their national actions for implementation of the present Framework by 2030; (g) Substantially increase the availability of and access to multi-hazard.”

All of that sounds great until the reader realizes that acquiring, cataloging, and storing all DNA is one of the chapters of Agenda 21. It sounds good until it is understood that the UN plans to surveil everything every human does in real time. It sounds good until we realize the UN ‘s emphasis upon health and education infrastructure is the most important because in education the UN can brainwash our children, and in healthcare settings the bastards can maim and murder us with impunity. Disasters which cause less economic damage sounds great until people realize that one way to achieve it is to dramatically decrease economic means. It sounds great unless you live in the West and are forced to pay taxes to a government which doesn’t care one whit about its own citizen’s well-being and gives billions, if not trillions, to foreign governments who probably care even less about the well-being of their citizens.

The UN operates just like Greenpeace did when they came upon a huge tract of ocean covered in floating garbage. Greenpeace took out their cameras, but not a net. They took plenty of pictures to bring home but took no garbage out of the ocean. When they returned to land, Greenpeace published the pictures and demanded money and action, yet didn’t go out there to start picking the garbage from the sea. The UN is doing, and continuously does, exactly the same thing as Greenpeace – here is YOUR problem that WE identified as a problem pay billions of dollars, because you ‘have it’ and go fix it by giving that money to ‘us.’ It’s global welfare which serves to embolden the likes of the UN, World Bank, World Economic Forum, and World Health Organization, while leaving those in rich nations poorer, and those in poor nations gazing at the wealth of their own leaders while they starve to death and are forced to drink tainted water.

Did you notice, reader, that Build Back Better is included in this? In order to build back, whatever was there must be ripped down. The term better is highly subjective. What may be better for you may not be better for me. The UN is promising that things will get torn down to be rebuilt in their image; not just buildings, livelihoods, lives, but the people themselves. This is why COVID-19 was endorsed by the UN. They have this demonic notion that God didn’t create humanity correctly because we die and they want to beat death. They will not be able to accomplish that goal because God is real – another aspect of reality these types of people refuse to acknowledge. Even if they did get radical life-extention and could live to 1,000 years old (eww) that technology is not meant for you, it’s meant for them. You and I are merely the means for them to acquire the technology (another increasingly demonically-inspired area) to not only live ‘forever’ but to cull the rest of us.

The UN rated 6 nations in 2021 upon how well they implemented the Sendai Framework. Qatar and the UK both scored 100% implementation. In 2020, 26 nations had at least 90% of the Sendai Framework implemented.

The United States with a 2019 rating of 75% of the Sendai Framwork implemented still has 56 local governments following its disaster preparedness plans. China reported no data but local policies are set in Beijing by whatever load of crap is heading up the politburo. North Korea operates the same way. In 2020, Russia had over 20,000 local governments following it’s national plan and in 2018 Germany had over 11,000 following it’s plan. Over 80% of Russia’s plan, and 50% of Germany’s plan was part of the Sendai Framework.

11.c Support least developed countries, including through financial and technical assistance, in building sustainable and resilient buildings utilizing local materials[.]”

There is no indicator for this target. In my estimation the reason for that is the UN doesn’t want to see the effect it’s own decrees, suggestions, and policies have done to help swell the slums around major metropolitan areas in Least Developed Nations. Slums are built out of cardboard and scrap wood – hardly sustainable.

The UN also does not want to see how many people end up living in homes constructed of adobe made out of dung. Dung is very sustainable, but also very toxic. Lumber, stone, cement, steel, glass, and a host of other building materials are not locally produced in many LDC’s and are not deemed sustainable by the UN. Exactly how the UN plans on bridging this gap between reality and this target is beyond me.

Summary

The UN wants to, at the very least, find a way to make every single life form on the planet subservient to their goals, starting with human beings. In order to enslave humanity, the monsters at the UN have repeatedly used scaremongering (man-made climate change), fear tactics (COVID-19), promulgation of war and the coexisting crimes coming with war like rape, torture, extortion, bribery, etc... (every single area a UN Peacekeeping mission has been deployed to), and going around any nations leagl system to instill its own values (Paris Climate Accord, UN Agenda 21, etc…). But, the UN doesn’t just want to enslave humanity, it seeks, along with it’s partners, to shut up and shut down anyone not in line with its goals who has the courage to speak up and speak about about their goals. Speaking up and speaking out about the screw job the UN is pulling endangers its stakeholders and they cannot have that, being as though some of their stakeholders are the same people pulling the strings of major world leaders and powers, including the UN, behind the scenes. And the UN wants to do their part by abolishing all private property by destroying the ability for any individual to gain an inheritance or find gainful work (the UN never mentions gainful employment – only meaningful employment).

The UN wants us obedient, poor, compliant, and subservient or dead if we will not bow to them. The UN wants to take control of all of the cities and force every human being within reason to dwell in their planned smart-coffin apartments, ride their smart-transportation, and work in their smart-businesses and smart-factories. That ‘smart’ part ensures humanity’s collective demise through increased idleness, the lack of purpose which attends prolonged idleness, dependence upon the state to provide for basic needs such as food and water and shelter, and eventually death as more and more individuals are deemed obsolete.

But, I contend, we ALL have a purpose – to seek the God of creation and to submit only to His Word. Only to His will. The authorities of the world, especially the politicians and academia and scientists – technocrats and/or transhumanists and/or satanists hate that idea. But it’s why I leave the last line in every one of these articles. If you don’t read it for yourself, how will you know what it says? And if you don’t know what it say, how are you going to know what God wants you to do? And if you don’t know what God wants you to do, well, you are very lost indeed and will be swept away on the current which is the way of the world – and damnation is the way of the world.

Open a Bible and read it. May God Bless You.

* https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=CM-VU-BI-WS-SD-US-1W

All quotes were found at https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11 unless otherwise documented.

Previous
Previous

How are the UN Sustainability Goals Going? Goal 12 of 17.

Next
Next

What in the World is Going on in Chile?