The Left Squeals as Raskin Begins to be Jones’d
Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity – 4/14/2024
The Left Squeals as Raskin Begins to be Jones’d
Jamie Raskin, a creature of Washington D.C. with a particularly rancid odor wrapped in a cloak of corruption, deceit, and hatred, is being targeted with defamation. While I think Raskin is one of the prime examples of the failures of representation in the federal government, I also value free speech. Free speech being taken away for one means that free speech will be taken away for all and Raskin is now being targeted by the same disgusting precedents set to find Alex Jones of infowars.com guilty of defaming surviving family members of the Sandy Hook school shooting. The Jones precedent has already been used multiple times against Donald Trump and others such as Roger Stone. Notice – none of these men are fans of the democrat party. Now that Raskin is being targeted, a real test of the precedent will be on display.
On March 20, 2024 Tony Bobulinski appeared in front of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. In his opening remarks before the Committee, Raskin being the second most powerful member, Bobulinski charges the Biden family with working for a known subversive organization beholden to the Chinese government. His remarks include a brief personal background as well as his relationships with the Biden’s and a list of some of the corruption the crime syndicate engaged in.
Raskin must have felt very threatened when Bobulinski stated:
“Hunter Biden was invited by this Committee to tell his side and the Biden family's side of the story. Unfortunately for him and the Biden family, their story is one of profound corruption, lies and perjury. It is no surprise that he is a no-show today, running like a coward from this opportunity to answer simple questions in public – a chance he was adamant about having and long said he wanted.”
Bobulinsi’s words basically sum up the entire Biden scheme. We (Democrats and, particularly, the Biden crime family) will do whatever we want. When we get caught being corrupt we will refuse to cooperate. At the same time we will demand that we want to cooperate but are being prevented from doing so. At no time will do we expect to ever face punishment for the corruption which has already been uncovered. This is what Raskin and the Biden’s think because they share a common focal point – everyone else on earth is beneath them and they have a right to do as they please without any regard for the well-being, safety, or security of anyone else. It is an unholy unity built upon the recognition of the singular virtue Raskin, the Biden’s, and many of the elite in this word hold in the highest esteem: selfishness.
To promote his selfishness and his utter disdain for Bobulinski and the rest of humanity in general, Raskin took to social media to smear this former business associate of the Biden crime family. On March 21 Raskin’s twitter account suggested that Bobulinski’s testimony originated from, ““Trump’s “cult” [who] will tell lies from any source—like Russian and Chinese agents, indicted liars and professional con artists behind bars—to smear Joe Biden.”
In the chambers of Congress the vagueness of Raskin’s Twitter assertions were more pointed. According to WND:
“In fact, according to the letter from lawyers Jesse Binnall and John C. Sullivan, representing Bobulinski, Raskin "mocked" various witnesses to Congress and posted a "freeze frame" that shows Bobulinski, with the chyron, "A disgruntled Wannabe Business Partner Turned Trump World Hype man."
“Raskin further publicly described Bobulinski as "a bitterly frustrated would be business partner who collaborated with the Trump campaign" and a "dubious" witness. And he called Bobulinski a "political pawn" and accused him of lying.”
Raskin constantly proves himself to be filled with an overwhelming and ideologically motivated hatred of the United States of America, the documents upon which our nation was created, and the people which strive to abide by those documents. Raskin’s targeting of Bobulinski merely serves as another example of Raskin’s irrational hatred. And while just about everyone with two brain cells to rub together find what Raskin had to say indefensible and detestable – he has the right to say it.
Combating offensive speech is done by countering the offensive speech with the truth. In no way do I believe that Bobulinski is out to harm Americans, dubious, a political pawn of Donald Trump, nor do I think he was lying when giving his testimony. Bobulinski has the receipts. Raskin would rather not have those receipts made public because they will shatter the democrat party’s bid to erect a single-party United States which Raskin hopes to play an important role in.
Alex Jones was found guilty without being given a proper trial. The trial he did receive was not one where he was able to provide a defense against the charges brought against him but merely to determine how guilty he was. It was a punishment hearing based on a judge’s intentional and malicious judicial malfeasance. Jones was found liable for damages he was prevented from being able to contest in the billions of dollars.
Donald Trump was not found guilty of raping anyone. The delusional entity which took him to court – the one who espoused rape fantasies on national news – was awarded millions for Donald Trump defending himself in court. Because Trump wasn’t found guilty of rape, the creature with the rape fantasies took Donald Trump to court for denying the allegations.
The precedent has been set that any speech a democrat or a democrat-sponsored Marxist finds offensive should be subjected to being deplatformed, sued, and even jailed. Now we shall see how devoted to the precedent the enemies of the people really are as similar lawsuits have been filed against one of their own.
Raskin has yet to see a bill censoring free speech which he has not voted in favor of. So, yes, he is receiving some of the deserts he intends for the rest of us. But those deserts are no less rotten than the deserts served to his political rivals. All censoring of speech is illegitimate in my mind. And there is good reason for this.
Today we are watching our televisions as Bible prophesy plays out. All eyes are on Israel. Now, what I say and what actions I support are of minimal value; however, I have the right to hold those opinions. Media outlets which I agree with have the right to publish their articles. Media outlets I disagree with have a right to publish their articles and, no matter how misled I believe some of those in the opposition to my positions are, they have a right to speak their minds without fear of governmental intervention.
I support Israel turning Tehran into rubble. I support Israel reducing Rafah to ruins. If they see fit to destroy Damascus in one hour, so be it. Tehran, Rafah, and Damascus as well as their little yappy dog Yemen could disappear tomorrow and I wouldn’t blink. They exist to exterminate every Jew off of the face of the earth as they see their course properly defined as establishing a global Islamic caliphate. Islam has no free speech. I refer you to Charlie Hebdo if you feel otherwise. Raskin would prefer I have no ability to have an opinion in the first place by destroying the existence any alternative thought patterns. The first step to destroying alternative thoughts is to destroy the dissemination of information.
This is precisely what Raskin and his friends in the democrat and republican parties have set as a goal. Why? Because they are at war with us, the people. Bobulinsi’s lawyers suing Raskin for defamation will not resolve the issues – it will further cement the silencing of the American people, their representatives, and anyone with a different idea. The precedent is exceedingly dangerous. 1984 brilliantly showed how it works out. History shows this as well – it is the way Stalin ruled the USSR. The fact that silencing the masses is a global effort being run, overall, out of global institutions in league with one another makes it all the more dangerous.
Raskin’s speech-travails are self-inflicted. Reports about Raskin’s silencing came out two days prior to Congress voting to continue spying on American citizens including political opponents without a warrant. FISA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, was given new life and an expansive role after the 9/11 terror attacks. Every five years it comes back up for a vote to see if changes need to be made. This years vote featured what amounts to a loss of freedom as the requirement for the court attached to FISA, the so-called FISA court (a ‘court’ in name only, it is a star chamber rife with politicized, ideological which thrives on corruption and fraud), is still not required to obtain a warrant to violate our rights under the 1st and 4th Amendments.
The day prior to Raskin and 146 of his democrat friends and 126 of his republican friends voted in favor of denying FISA’s need to obtain a warrant, Florida Representative (Dist. 13) Anna Paulina Luna was on radio broadcasts warning the world that this court was spying on her and her colleagues in Congress. After the vote, Luna, a rising star of the republican party, issued a statement noting her disgust with those who voted in favor of warrantless surveillance of American’s.
The reason Raskin and his friends cannot seem to see what they are actually doing is because they are walking in the skewed lights of the world and not the purity and truth of G-d. And, for this reason, those who vote for, endorse, and use this logic in legal battles are doing so because they have no truth in them. The 30,000 foot view of this issues – the overwhelming force driving these people – is to have the ability for anyone to worship G-d stolen from them.
While it feels good to watch Raskin be sued, it is not a positive development. It is a major step in the wrong direction, a direction which restricts free speech with the intention of destroying our ability to worship G-d. Bobuliski’s lawsuit needs to be retracted. The FISA court needs to be dismantled. Those who have already declared war on the speech of US citizens need to be removed from power (see S. 686’s cosponsors as well as those voting in favor of the FISA bill). We must preserve our ability to speak freely and we must do so in order to worship G-d as He has declared we should worship Him. If we don’t, we will be forced to bow to whatever man-made idol these types of humanity-hating monsters decide we will be bowing down to.
Bless G-d and G-d bless.