How are the UN Sustainability Goals Going? Goal 9 of 17.
Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity
4/23/2022
The seventeen United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the goals of the Great Reset. The SDGs were adopted in 2015 by United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The cover for the SDGs were that they would provide relief for disabled peoples by 2030 according to Agenda 2030. To fully understand Agenda 2030, a review of Agenda 21 should be undertaken, which I will not do here. In this article I will focus on the 9th SDG:
Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
By the United Nations own constitution, infrastructure can only be built by governments, inclusive and sustainable are used as euphemisms, industrialization is not what anyone thinks it is, and innovation will only occur with massive amounts of capital transfers to those supporting this and the other SDGs. To rewrite this to reflect what the United Nations is really saying: Collect and distribute trillions of dollars in massive nation to nation welfare schemes, give the money to any entity who thinks carbon is bad, whether that entity is a ruthless dictator of just some gullible peasant who has bought into the decarbonization effort, and, as part of the welfare scheme, buy scientists and research efforts in order to further technologies which will starve vast swathes of the globe to death while at the same time creating an open air prison for those surviving the man-made, UN-directed, famine. If you don’t think it’s that way, I encourage you to read on.
The UN’s targets to build infrastructure, industry, and encourage innovation are:
“9.1 Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and transborder infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being, with a focus on affordable and equitable access for all
“9.2 Promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and, by 2030, significantly raise industry’s share of employment and gross domestic product, in line with national circumstances, and double its share in least developed countries
“9.3 Increase the access of small-scale industrial and other enterprises, in particular in developing countries, to financial services, including affordable credit, and their integration into value chains and markets
“9.4 By 2030, upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes, with all countries taking action in accordance with their respective capabilities
“9.5 Enhance scientific research, upgrade the technological capabilities of industrial sectors in all countries, in particular developing countries, including, by 2030, encouraging innovation and substantially increasing the number of research and development workers per 1 million people and public and private research and development spending
“9.a Facilitate sustainable and resilient infrastructure development in developing countries through enhanced financial, technological and technical support to African countries, least developed countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing States
“9.b Support domestic technology development, research and innovation in developing countries, including by ensuring a conducive policy environment for, inter alia, industrial diversification and value addition to commodities
“9.c Significantly increase access to information and communications technology and strive to provide universal and affordable access to the Internet in least developed countries by 2020”
I’m going to cover these one by one.
“9.1 Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and transborder infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being, with a focus on affordable and equitable access for all[.]”
The first thing I think about when I hear infrastructure are roads, dams, and telecommunications. All of these are types of infrastructure, but that doesn’t satisfy the definition for infrastructure given by UN Habitat:
“Broadly defined, therefore, infrastructure refers to all basic inputs into and requirements for the proper functioning of the economy. In spite of this, there are two generally accepted categories, namely, economic and social infrastructure.”
With this definition, UN Habitat is taking the traditional elements of what infrastructure actually is (facilitating transport over land, sea, and air, hospital capacity, communications systems, electrical power generation, etc…) and moving into the social sciences. It takes capable people to use traditional infrastructure, but those people are not infrastructure themselves. The workforce is a resource, but it is not infrastructure. But the UN has decided it is, and, thus, has extended a tentacle into all kinds of social realms under the guise of infrastructure, including “health, education and recreation” because they have “a direct and indirect impact on the quality of life.” This UN Habitat document also includes safety as part of social infrastructure.
Safety, of course, comes at the expense of freedom, and, as used by UN Habitat, is a very subjective term. ‘For the safety of yourself and others, make sure you stay 6 feet away from everyone, and wear a mask, and take 6 shots (so far), and test yourself regularly, and the Ebola shot, and the HIV shot, and blah blah blah.’ These interventions could, under this definition, be called infrastructure – but, of course, none of this is infrastructure, and I am positive there are many at the UN who see these mitigation efforts as just that – infrastructure. It’s death. The target I’m writing about actually states the social version of infrastructure is intended and so does the goal itself.
To compound the issues which arise with this target are the blatant demands for the dissolution of national boundaries by calling for regionalization and trans-boundary projects. Not only are commodities like hydroelectric power generation of tariff policies between nations hinted at, but migration of laborers is implied. If there are no boundaries, there are no nations, and with no nations, there is no sovereign rule over a domain. The default sovereigns, the UN hopes, will become the themselves and their friends who hope to institute, and are very close to achieving, a totalitarian technocracy.
The cherry on top is in the last passage which contains the terms affordable and equitable. Is a 33.6% increase over the last 12 months in global food prices affordable? How about a gallon of gas in the US, which went from $2.33 in March 2020 to $4.32 in March 2022? Is the expected increase of £700 a year in the UK affordable? Over four months, December 2021 – March 2022, Brazil’s gas prices rose from $1.17 to $1.52 a liter – $5.76 a gallon from $4.43. In China it rose $0.06 per liter over the last month (23 cents a gallon). In the Netherlands and Germany gas prices per liter rose $0.26 and $0.25, respectively ($0.99 and $0.95 a gallon, respectively). All of these prices are for gasoline save for the statistic out of the UK, which is for heating gas. None of this is affordable.
And then there is equity, defined by the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE), as:
“The term ‘equity’ refers to fairness and justice and is distinguished from equality: Whereas equality means providing the same to all, equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances. The process is ongoing, requiring us to identify and overcome intentional and unintentional barriers arising from bias or systemic structures.”
Do you hate Critical Race Theory? It is implied in this definition. The premise is being given the ability to read, write, and do math is not enough to get along in this world. Some people are owed something by other people and they teach this in schools to six-year-olds. They teach that one group is the oppressor and the other the victim with the intent of setting the world on fire because UN ‘educational infrastructure’ seeks to instill a victim mentality in one group, that must be remunerated for their ‘victimhood’ and that the ‘oppressors’ must submissively pay the debt. These kids are six and eight, fifteen – they owe no one anything and they are not victims of an oppressor class with one caveat. If anything, ALL of these kids, and their parents, too, are victims of the elite of their respective nations and the world, and international bodies like the United Nations.
The United Nations is telling certain nations that they are oppressors of other nations because of the resources within their national boundaries which the other nation does not possess. Water, petroleum, zinc, bauxite, diamonds – nations rich in these, and many other resources, are being called upon to allow their neighbors to have access to them based on EQUITY.
This target ensures war. It ensures entire nations are subservient to the desires and wills of another nation with a resource the former nation requires. The United Nations has no actual will to promote human well-being as they demand that everything be directed by their protocols (all based on Agenda 21 – go read it).
The indicators for this target are to have every rural person live within 2 kilometers (1.243 miles) of an all season road and to track passengers and freight by means of transport. The poor reporting from nations about the first indicator make it extremely hard to track. The highest percentage out of the 25 countries which have ever reported on the topic is the United Arab Emirates with 99.5% (2021 up from 95.1% in 2019) and the lowest is Madagascar with 11.4% (2017). Other notables with high rates percentages are Lebanon with 92.6 (2018) and Bangladesh at 86.7% (2015). Notable lows include Lesotho at 18% (2016) and Zambia with 17% (2011). 15 of the 25 nations which have reported are under 50%.
The UN reports that the second indicator has risen from 310.44 million air passengers in 1970 to 4.4 billion in 2019. In 1995 there were 2.02 billion train passengers in 2007 there were 2.34 billion train passengers. Air freights went from 15.57 billion tons per kilometer in 1973 to 215.17 billion in 2019. These statistics indicate that people are more able to fly to a destination, people still ride trains, and people send all kinds of stuff to all kinds of places.
The psychopathic United Nations, their psychopathic friends, and many sycophantic national governments around the world have seen the COVID-19 as a crisis which must not be wasted. Apparently, the goal is to obliterate reasonable shipping rates and complete surveillance of any traveler.
There are a multitude of products in the United States which have become increasingly scarce or manipulated by man into scarcity. Petroleum, fertilizer, chicken, resins, and food in general have all leapt in price over the last several months. And we are not the only nation suffering from this, as mentioned above, meaning it is not just an issue of a devaluing dollar.
“9.2 Promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and, by 2030, significantly raise industry’s share of employment and gross domestic product, in line with national circumstances, and double its share in least developed countries[.]”
In 1997 the world rate for value added (adding all the outputs and then subtracting all the intermediate inputs) manufacturing was 17.54% of gross GDP. In 2019 it stood lower at 14.46%. Once again the United Nations target is moving in the wrong direction, although LDCs moved slightly in the right direction for the UN, from 10.84 in 1991 to 11.08% in 2019. In 28 years, this target advanced 0.32 percentage points. Pat yourselves on the back, UN, whatever you are doing is really going gangbusters here.
Another interest of the United Nations is to see how many people are employed in manufacturing compared to total employment. Worldwide, these rates stood at 15% in 2020 and 13.1%, also in 2020. From 1991 to 2017 the rates rose from 20.84% to 21.55%. Fewer people are producing manufactured goods these days, which shows another abject failure of yet another UN target. Three statistics worth noting here is that between 1991 and 2017 high income nations lost over 9 percentage points, low income countries gained 0.05 percentage points, but the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) gained 1.41, -6.18, 9.04, 4.45, and 0.65 percentage points respectively. Vietnam went up over 13 percentage points, Oman went up over 32 percentage points, and Cambodia and Qatar each went up over 15 percentage points during this time period. Meanwhile, the United States and United Kingdom combined for a loss of over 20.5 percentage points.
Not only did the UN not manage to manipulate these rates, it seems all that happened was a mass exodus of industry leaving wealthier countries to operate in less wealthy ones. It makes sense from a business standpoint because the workers in the destination countries have no labor unions, no workers rights, and will work for what amounts to fractions of what a US, German, or UK employee would cost them. The answer is to recognize this and to never buy a thing from these companies again. All they are doing is depressing the wealthy nations, starving them of employment opportunities, and propping up the least human-friendly regimes on the planet, and the UN ENDORSES the practices and applauds the outcomes. The multinational business which do this have strangled millions of mom-and-pops out of business while at the same time receiving praise from their overlords at the UN.
“9.3 Increase the access of small-scale industrial and other enterprises, in particular in developing countries, to financial services, including affordable credit, and their integration into value chains and markets[.]”
This too, is a poorly reported target. In 2008 Australia reported 20.81% of their industries were small-scale. In 2015 they reported 20.17% Japan reported 11.96% in 2011 and 10.02 in 2015. Bosnia and Herzegovina reported in 2015 and 2019 with rates falling from 15.22% to 11.13%. One of the poorest nations in Europe, Ukraine, reported a rise between 2017 and 2019, from 5.18% to 7.75%. Finally, India, with the second largest population on the planet, reported 3.07% in 2010 and by 2017 had 2.24% of their total industry being operated on a small-scale basis.
As far as small-scale industry’s having access to credit, in 2022 the world was at 29.8%. Bosnia Herzegovina lost 14.93 percentage points between 2009 (59.31%) to 2019 (44.38%). Ukraine also lost a good chunk of small-scale industry with credit – in 2008 it stood at 17.63% and fell to 12.46% in 2019. From 2007 to 2020, South Africa declined; 21.1% to 5.52%. India’s rate was only reported once to date, in 2014, and it stood at 27.98%. In 2022 the United Nations, through the World Bank, finally developed a statistic for this target which covered the Least Developed Countries which were at 17.04%. Russia, Peru, Ethiopia, Chile, Benin, Venezuela, Columbia, and Bulgaria all rose over 20 percentage points from the first to the last time they reported (highest, in descending order). Those losing over 20 percentage points were Moldova, Croatia, Morocco, Niger, Cameroon, Slovakia, Azerbaijan, Suriname, Rwanda, and El Salvador.
In May 2021 the World Economic Forum reported that 34% of US businesses were still closed due to the COVID-19 scamdemic. The vast majority of these businesses will never reopen. In South Africa there were even more business liquidations in 2021 than during the same time period (January to the end of June) in 2020. Thailand has an untold number of business which will never reopen as they have never really ceased their lock-down measures and social restrictions. China, as I have mentioned in previous writings, has at least 14 million people in Shanghai starving to death, not able to leave their homes for grocery runs, let alone going to work. On April 19, 2022, Business Insider reported that there are 400 million Chinese under full or partial lock-down. My point here is that MILLIONS of businesses have been shut down permanently across the world, and many of them small scale businesses, some of which were industrial in nature.
It begs the question, what the Hell is really going on here? What’s going on here is a consolidation of business enterprises. The multinationals will survive and grow. They will buy up the unused manufacturing capacity for pennies on the dollar and give workers a job and pay them at subsistence levels. Certain global conglomerates and multinational corporations will divvy up the now defunct services once offered by entrepreneurs, who are locked up in their homes, as are their now former employees for less than pennies on the dollar. Welcome to the Great Reset, the unnecessary and completely man-made culling and destitution of the useless eater class (which is everyone, according to the entities doing this). If you understand this, you are ahead of the curve and need to work to get EVERY human on earth to understand this.
Go read Memorandum 200 (1974). Or check out this synopsis. And then go read the Hunger Games trilogy. Or go check out this fact – in April of 2020, the head of the UN’s World Food Programme said that 30 million people will die of starvation unless, of course, more money is sent to the organization (oh, and by the way, that is an Alex Jones fact check – Jones and infowars.com reported it, did your news source? #AlexJonesWasRight). At my last check I couldn’t eat the increasingly worthless crap the US calls currency and I’ll bet those 30 million people would rather see a food shipment they can eat rather than the demonic people lurking in the halls of the UN paying their salaries first and then maybe buying some GMO Gates-farmed-and-mutated garbage the UN dumps on them and calls food. We are LIVING the Hunger Games – and that isn’t by accident.
“9.4 By 2030, upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes, with all countries taking action in accordance with their respective capabilities[.]”
The UN SDG-tracker website does a really good job of putting this target into perspective: “Upgrade all industries and infrastructures for sustainability.” And the indicator for this target is even more precise: “CO2 emission per unit of value added[.]” The UN is going to measure carbon intensity for this target’s evaluation.
The way the UN has laid this out is the total amount of CO2 produced by a nation divided by the GDP of that same nation. The UN has their table set up to start at 1820 if that gives any indication of how utterly stupid the whole man-made climate change issue is. Henry Ford did not start producing cars on manufacturing lines until 1908. Prior to that there were cars, but they were not produced en masse. In 1919 paved roads were rare and horse riding for transportation was more common than the horseless carriage.
Because of the way the UN has decided to track this goal, almost every country has risen in CO2 production over the time periods chosen. There seems to be some kind of link between producing things useful to others and carbon production. Mentioning that increased carbon (in a carbon STARVED world, in my opinion) will allow more vegetation, including edible versions of vegetation is immaterial to the UN, they started a war on carbon, picking up from where Malthus (1798) and Paul Ehrlich (author of “Population Bomb” in 1968) left off; using climate change and false science to claim an existential man-made calamity await unless humanity stops producing carbon – whether carbon life forms or carbon dioxide.
Between 2010 and 2018 the results are less skewed towards the UN’s conclusion that carbon dioxide is going to kill all of us; it went from 0.37 to 0.32 kg of carbon dioxide per USD of GDP. Going backwards in time the starting rate in 2000 was 0.42, in 1990 it was 0.53, and in 1980 the starting point would be at 0.61. The most important CO2 monitoring station is located in Mauna Loa, Hawaii (a volcano, dormant or not, it is still a volcano), which began continuously monitoring CO2 levels in 1958. The UN has no data for 1958 but, in 1960, if we go back that far, the kg of CO2 per dollar of GDP was at 0.71.
These metrics show a global correlation between CO2 production and economic prosperity. In 1960 world GDP was $1.35 trillion, and in 2019 it was $87.608 trillion dollars. In 1960 there were 2.89 million kilotons of CO2 produced and in 2018 there were 4.981 million kilotons produced. The highest rate of man-made CO2 production recorded was in 2000 at 5.776 million kilotons, which happens to be the same year the UN’s Millennium Goals, the forerunner to these SDGs, were adopted.
When the power that creates this CO2 is displaced by windmills and solar power it will create unreliable electrical grids and less food for people. What a beautiful thing that God gave to us – the so-called fossil fuels (which are not derived from fossils) – that replenish CO2 in the atmosphere which supports life on earth! And these entities want to destroy that chain, as small as it is.
“9.5 Enhance scientific research, upgrade the technological capabilities of industrial sectors in all countries, in particular developing countries, including, by 2030, encouraging innovation and substantially increasing the number of research and development workers per 1 million people and public and private research and development spending[.]”
The World Economic Forum, always eager to create a situation which enables them to usher in the Great Reset, is excited about nations which spend a high percentage of their GDP on research and development. They note that in 2017, 2018, and 2019 the top spenders were Israel (4.96%), South Korea (4.81%), Switzerland (3.37%), followed by Sweden, Japan, Austria, Germany (3.09%), Denmark, United States (2.84%), and Belgium. China came in at 2.19% (13th) and the UK came in in 21st with 1.72%. The World Economic Forum is almost gleeful in their reporting the UK statistic and suggest that their decision to leave the European Union was part of the reason for their low number.
In 2020 the top five spenders on research and development were the United States, China, Japan, Germany, and India. The percentage of GDP those nations spent on research and development represents is 2.85%, 3.62%, 3.76%, 3.37%, and 3.65%, respectively. All of these percentages, rose in 2020, even in the United States, and the purpose was to create useless ‘green’ crap.
A far as the number of researchers, the United Nations reported in 2015 there were over 4,000 researchers per million people in the US in 2012, over 1,100 per million in China in 2014, 156.64 per million in India in 2010, South Korea had 6,899 researchers per million people in 2014, Finland led the world with 6985.94 per million people in 2014. Science Business reported that, globally there were 8.8 million researchers in the world in 2018.
Those researchers are researching ways to destroy humanity from an engineering, scientific, and technological standpoint. Goda Naujokaityre wrote on June 14, 2021:
“Global R&D spending grew faster than the economy between 2014 and 2018 as countries around the world turned to research to bring on the green and digital transitions, says a new UNESCO report.
“Worldwide, science spending increased by 19% over the four years, while the number of scientists grew by 13.7% to 8.8 million.
“Since the start of 2020, the COVID-19 crisis further boosted this trend.
“The 762-page report covers 193 countries. ‘What struck me with this one is the alignment of development priorities with different income levels, whether they are industrialised or low-income countries,’ Susan Schneegans, editor-in-chief of the report, told Science|Business. Countries around the globe are prioritising digital and green R&I investments to boost competitiveness and future preparedness.
“However, the growth is for the most part, uneven. China and the US together account for 63% of the increase in spending, while the EU countries added a further 11%.
“Taken together, the G20 countries boast 88.8% of the world’s researchers, 93.2% of research spending and 90.6% of scientific publications.
“Private sector spending on science in most cases is relatively low, with the public sector accounting for the majority of investment. Incentivising companies and start-ups to do more research and development is one solution to boosting efforts. ‘But before a company can do R&D, it needs equipment,’ Schneegans said.
“As low and middle income companies strive to catch up, one way to spur private sector investment is R&D tax credits. As one notable example, Indonesia, introduced a 300% tax reduction on research expenditure in 2019.
“Alongside incentives, companies need capital and a solid regulatory environment. ‘In Africa, it costs more than 10 times more to patent than in the UK,’ Schneegans said, pointing to structural inequalities that can deter private sector investments in science.
“Despite this, developing countries are slowly increasing their footprint in the global research landscape. Between 2015 and 2018, high-income countries’ share of scientific publications shrank from 69.3% to 62.9%, as developing countries increased their output. In cross-disciplinary strategic technologies, the share slipped even further, from 60.5% to 52.2%.
“‘Science must become less unequal, more cooperative and more open,’ said Audrey Azoulay, director general of UNESCO. ‘Today’s challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, decline of ocean health and pandemics are all global. This is why we must mobilise scientists and researchers from all over the world,’
“Green or digital?
“Green technologies are expected to lead the transition into a carbon neutral future. But for now, most low- and middle-income countries are focusing on digital as a way to boost competitiveness.
“While health research is still king, accounting for 34% of scientific publications in 2019, the share of publications on cross-cutting strategic technologies climbed up to 18% the same year.
“These journal papers were largely dominated by artificial intelligence and robotics research, with almost 150,000 articles published in 2019.
“This is an area where lower middle-income countries have made an impact, contributing over a quarter of publications, up from 12.8% in 2015.
“While AI and robotics are in the ascendency, crucial research into carbon capture and storage remains underfunded, with only 2,500 articles in 2019. Meanwhile, in six of the ten leading countries in the field, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and the current leader, the US, research is declining.
“Similarly, sustainable energy research looks under-resourced, accounting for 2.5% of global publications, up from 2.1% over 2012–2015.
“The same applies to studies on the impact of climate change and many other green topics, with scientific output increasing by at least 0.02% for only 19 of the 56 research topics between 2012 and 2019.
“‘To succeed in their dual transition, governments will not only need to spend more on R&D; they will also need to invest these funds strategically,’ the report says. ‘This will entail taking the long-term view and aligning their economic, digital, environmental, industrial and agricultural policies, among others, to ensure that these are mutually reinforcing.’”
They are building a prison. I’m sure they will finish it up, too, because too many people are either ignorant of these events, deny these events are real (usually due to normalcy bias), or actually support it. Pinterest is a good example of the stupidity of going along with these goals. On April 22, 2022 they updated their policy to destroy any debate on climate change being caused by mankind so they can maintain their safe space. Pinterest is merely a jail cell in a world being turned, increasingly into a conglomerations of different jail cells in both the digital and physical worlds.
“9.a Facilitate sustainable and resilient infrastructure development in developing countries through enhanced financial, technological and technical support to African countries, least developed countries, landlocked developing countries and small island developing States[.]”
Between 2015 and 2019, China received $12.09 billion for infrastructure projects. During the same time period, India secured $31.87 billion, Chad got $177.9 million, and Ukraine got about $4.38 billion. Least Developed Countries got $48.34 billion between 2015-2019. Being as though there are 46 nations counted as Least Developed that comes out to an average of $210 million a year per country.
In 2019 the LDC’s had a combined GDP of $1.1. trillion while China boasted the second highest GDP in the world at $14.28 trillion. So why is China getting a single cent for any infrastructure project?
The United Nations seems to have a racism problem. They are not giving anything to Africans compared to other nations, such as China. Meanwhile the vast majority of those living in poverty are located in Africa with limited or no access to electricity, food, sanitation, water, nor economic opportunities. And the UN doesn’t seem to really care about it too much. They seem to want to promote Chinese growth and give African nations just enough to subsist on unless there is some kind of shock to the system like, say, the Great Reset.
“9.b Support domestic technology development, research and innovation in developing countries, including by ensuring a conducive policy environment for, inter alia, industrial diversification and value addition to commodities[.]”
Worldwide between 2000 and 2019, the world lost 1.61 percentage points, Least Developed Countries lost 5.73 percentage points, and developing nations gained 0.36 percentage points while measuring the proportion of medium and high-tech industry value added in total value added. Not too slick, in my opinion. The top three outliers in this measurement, Qatar, Oman, and Kuwait, each gained over 30 percentage points, while the top three which lost percentage shares were Niger, Israel, and Egypt.
“9.c Significantly increase access to information and communications technology and strive to provide universal and affordable access to the Internet in least developed countries by 2020[.]”
Now, I enjoy the internet, the streaming, doing my live feeds, and trying to get people to read these articles which are posted on my website. That said, there are dangers inherent in beginning to rely on the internet too much. If it went down, all payment systems would cease to function, gas wouldn’t be able to be pumped, and there would be billions of people around the globe who suddenly would have to find something else to do besides play with their smartphone.
Dangers also lurk when everyone is online. The idea that pinterest, facebook, twitter (for now), google, youtube, or any of a host of social media sites have created propaganda echo chambers and will ban users for saying things like AOC is a Nazi-loving crack whore is unnerving and, honestly, destructive of human communication. On reddit users give up and down votes on posts they like or dislike, which, in a weird way, is representative of the future of the world of social credit scores. Once the internet is used by a certain number of people, social credit scores will ‘go live’ globally and be used to determine credit worthiness, whether an individual can travel, where an individual can work, live, send their kids to school at, and a host of other permissions determined by an individual’s social credit score.
40.9% of the world used the internet in 2015 which substantially grew to 56.73% in 2019. Social credit scores being a reality are getting closer and closer.
Summary
Infrastructure is important to economic development. It would stand to reason that the nations with the lowest incomes lack effective infrastructure to enable productive people to create, goods and resources for domestic use and trading. If the world is supposed to come together to help those with the least, those nations with large populations of people living in poverty should be getting the vast majority of the resources. The United Nations is not doing that. The World Bank is not doing that. They will never actually assist a nation because the UN wishes to enslave the world through their plans, as laid out in these SDGs.
This goal is the key piece to the UN’s entire design. Without the ability to surveil the world, the UN will never be able to effectively institute, monitor, or manipulate the social credit score they wish to enslave humanity with.
Open a Bible and read it. May God Bless You.
All quotes were found at https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal9 unless otherwise documented.