How are the UN Sustainability Goals Going? Goal 13 of 17.
Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity
5/10/2022
The seventeen United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the goals of the Great Reset. The SDGs were adopted in 2015 by United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The cover for the SDGs were that they would provide relief for disabled peoples by 2030 according to Agenda 2030. To fully understand Agenda 2030, a review of Agenda 21 should be undertaken, which I will not do here. In this article I will focus on the 13th SDG:
Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
They want us all dead and this goal is the proof in the pudding. It is even creepier that the logo for this goal is the earth in green sitting in the middle of an eye. The 5 targets under this demonic depopulation plan are:
“13.1 Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries
“13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning
“13.3 Improve education, awareness-raising and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction and early warning
“13.a Implement the commitment undertaken by developed-country parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to a goal of mobilizing jointly $100 billion annually by 2020 from all sources to address the needs of developing countries in the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation and fully operationalize the Green Climate Fund through its capitalization as soon as possible
“13.b Promote mechanisms for raising capacity for effective climate change-related planning and management in least developed countries and small island developing States, including focusing on women, youth and local and marginalized communities * Acknowledging that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is the primary international, intergovernmental forum for negotiating the global response to climate change.”
I’m going to cover these one by one.
“13.1 Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries[.]”
There are two indicators for this target. The first indicator is death and injuries caused by natural disasters. The first of four graphics used to measure the indicator is the number of people per 100,000 who died from natural disasters between 1990 and 2019. In 1990 the world rate was 0.94 and in 2019 it was 0.08. The highest year was 2004 in which 3.75 people per 100,000 were killed by natural disasters. Since 2015, the highest rate was 0.21.
The second graph shows deaths and missing persons per 100,000. In 2020 the countries with the highest totals were Slovenia, Armenia, Sweden, Bolivia, and Russia. The lowest totals were in Bulgaria, Cambodia, Jordan, Chile, and Cook Islands (they all had 0.00).
Graph three displays internal displacements caused by natural disasters. In 2008 there were 38.24 million and in 2020 there were 30.69 million. This statistic only accounts for new displacements, and as I noted in a prior analysis, does not incorporate anyone which is able to return home, nor does it accurately reflect the total number of displacements.
The fourth graph is about the number of people directly affected by natural disasters per 100,000 people. Marshall Islands and Togo managed over 100,000 per 100,000 people in 2020. Marshall Islands only had a population of 59,190 in 2020. So, my conclusion is that all of the inhabitants of Marshall Islands are represented 1.8 times in this statistic.
The second indicator is broken into two metrics. The first measurement looks at which countries have adopted and implemented, and how intensely, policies to reduce disaster risk. Overall, there are at least eight nations which have fully implemented the Sendai Framework (covered in 11.b.1).
The second measurement is local disaster risk management. Russia, the nation with the most localities (20,846) which are UN-compliant in this area. There are thousands and thousands of other localities around the globe which the UN has deemed compliant.
I have no problem with trying to mitigate death and economic damage resulting from natural disasters. What I have a problem with is the fact that the United Nations will point at this target every time there is a hurricane, typhoon, major winter storm, tornado swarm, drought, landslide, earthquake, volcanic eruption, flood, or any other natural disaster and immediately do their best to link it to manmade climate change. Their arguments are false and every time they make such an argument they are gas-lighting the world. It would not surprise me at all if the United Nations actually monitors the effectiveness of their lies and how well people are accepting of those lies.
“13.2 Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning[.]”
There have been multiple documents, agreements, frameworks, conferences, conventions, and protocols produced, signed, adopted, implemented, and enacted throughout the years. The United Nations tracks a number of these in 2015 and the number of countries which have signed on to each one. The Cartagena Protocol on Biodiversity, Convention on Biological Diversity, Cites Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, World Heritage Convention, Kyoto Protocol, Vienna Convention (Ozone), Ramsar Convention, Rotterdam Convention, Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, UN Convention to Combat Desertification, UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and the UN Convention on Climate Change are the 13 metrics to see how well the world is cooperating with the United Nations.
The Cartagena Protocol on Biodiversity’s objective reads:
“In accordance with the precautionary approach contained in Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, the objective of this Protocol is to contribute to ensuring an adequate level of protection in the field of the safe transfer, handling and use of living modified organisms resulting from modern biotechnology that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, and specifically focusing on transboundary movements.”
Basically the UN set out to ensure that biological diversity is preserved because of the rise of genetically modified organisms. The United Nations set up a Biosafety Clearing-House in order to regulate transnational movements of chimeric materials, including viruses, food, and DNA with this Convention. In order for the UN to do this, they must endorse the creation of chimeras. Anyone creating a chimera or endorsing the creation of a chimera, at their core, holds the idea that God did not make things on earth (including humans) correctly but mankind will fix that. Ending humanity 1.0 (people created in the image of God, and all other life on earth as God created it), is not a good idea, and being inculcated into being a part of humanity 2.0 is an even worse, irreversible, idea.
109 nations have signed onto the Cartagena Protocol, yet another head of the Agenda 21 hydra. The United States is not part of this.
The Convention on Biological Diversity’s objective reads:
“The objectives of this Convention, to be pursued in accordance with its relevant provisions, are the conservation of biological diversity. the sustainable use of its components and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources, including by appropriate access to genetic resources and by appropriate transfer of relevant technologies, taking into account all rights over those resources and to technologies, and by appropriate funding.”
To effect this, the Convention on Biological Diversity orders the parties to it to identify areas in which biological diversity needs to be preserved and create conservation and sustainability plans for those areas (as well as outside of those areas). Restoration projects of these areas are commanded by this Convention. The elimination of alien species, including genetically modified chimeras, in these areas is to be conducted. The Convention also states that there are endangered species which need to be protected through legislation and regulations. In order for this to Convention to work properly, wealth transfers need to occur from the developed world to the developing world. The Convention also demands that in the cases where the natural habitat is not able to carry the life forms in it, pseudo-natural habitats are created until the population grow sufficient enough to be released back into its natural setting – for this, too, developed nations are supposed to pay developing nations to create these pseudo-natural habitats. The Convention also states that technological developments need to seek solutions to preserve biological diversity and kids in schools should be indoctrinated about biological diversity. Environmental Assessments are a condition of parties to this Convention.
This Convention was created on June 5, 1992. Even in 1992, chimeras were being addressed within the text. This Convention is where the Cartanga Protocol stemmed from.
196 countries have signed onto the Convention of Biological Diversity. The United States signed, but never ratified, this thing.
Cites Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora sets out specifications for importing endangered life forms. The United Nations seems to have more worries about the fate of an endangered species than they do about human beings which they leave to starve to death, end up butchered in wars, and end up dead from the vaccines they push.
181 countries have signed onto this Convention. The United States is a party to this stupid thing which places animals in higher regard than human beings – it was ratified on July 1, 1975.
The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals sets up the basis for the Wildland Project. Any migratory animal will carve paths over the land or through certain corridors through the air. This Convention seeks to protect the animals by protecting their pathways. And that means no human interaction with those corridors in which those animals and insects and birds pass.
122 Nations have signed onto this Convention. The United States is not one of them as far as I can discern. That has not prevented certain groups from pushing this forward outside of the UN.
The World Heritage Convention was created in 1972. While I have already covered the implications of World Heritage Sites, the intent is to carve out as much ‘important’ land as possible and place it under UNESCO protection.
There are 190 nations involved in this. The United States ratified this UN land-grabbing garbage on July 7, 1973.
The Kyoto Protocol is pretty widely known and serves to destroy life by deeming CO2 a pollutant. It also defines five other pollutants to be controlled – methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. All of the gases are to be tracked and allotments meted out in order to meet reduction targets. Of course, not every nation had to reduce output of these gases, some, like Iceland, were green-lit to increase their production of these gases while the US and EU were slated to reduce emissions by 7% and 8%, respectively.
193 parties have signed the Kyoto Protocol, including the United States on 12/11/1998; however the treaty was never ratified and I do not believe it was ever put to a vote either.
The Vienna Convention (Ozone) spawned the Montreal Protocol. The Vienna Convention demands that parties to it adhere to what the UN has deemed “chemical substances of natural and anthropogenic origin […] thought to have the potential to modify the chemical and physical properties of the ozone layer.” These gases include carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, and non-methane hydrocarbon species, nitrous oxide, nitrogen oxides, fully and partially hydrogenated alkanes (chlorine compounds), bromine substances, and finally, H2 and dihydrogen monoxide, or water. Article 2 section b reads:
“Adopt appropriate legislative or administrative measures and co-operate in harmonizing appropriate policies to control, limit, reduce or prevent human activities under their jurisdiction or control should it be found that these activities have or are likely to have adverse effects resulting from modification or likely modification of the ozone layer;”
It is not really a very big stretch of the imagination to see where this is going to go should there be an authority wishing to control it’s citizens. Washing a car or watering a lawn will be outlawed. Splashing in a pool could release chlorine into the air. We all breathe and we all release traces of methane from time to time and those are also to be controlled. Should some slightly more malevolent actor come upon a leadership role in the world and wish to, this Convention could be the justification for just murdering a billion or three people to reduce CO2 and maybe getting rid of all domesticated animals while they are at it. Oh, wait – these freaks are already doing that (COVID-19 and the vaccines, and the mass slaughter of livestock).
On 8/27/1986 the United States ratified the Vienna Convention (Ozone). In total there are 197 countries which have signed onto it.
The Ramsar Convention deals with wetlands protections. Parties which sign up and ratify this document are to create a list of their wetlands with a special emphasis on the protection of waterfowl. Any changes to the wetlands are to be immediately reported to the UN, especially if those changes are because of “human interference.”
The Ramsar Convention has a funny way of explaining the puddles and ponds which the US EPA has repeatedly abused it’s authority by attempting to regulate. The EPA, with its Water Protection Act has literally gone after US citizens for violating the Act, which apparently takes its definition of bodies of water out of the Ramsar Convention, over puddles.
This Convention also demands that parties to it create “nature reserves” whether the area is included in the list or not. Any so designated area is generally not able to be built on or developed in any way.
The US ratified this on 12/18/1986 as have 169 nations.
The Rotterdam Convention deals with transporting certain pesticides and chemicals across national boundaries. This was covered slightly more in depth in the 12th goal, 4th target.
There are 154 nations on board the Rotterdam Convention. The United States signed this but has not ratified it.
The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants was also covered more in depth in the 12th goal, 4th target.
The United States has signed but not ratified this treaty. There are 172 parties to the Convention.
The UN Convention to Combat Desertification is basically a huge transfer of money from the developed world to the governments in sub-Saharan Africa in particular. The idea is to not allow the desert to grow larger; however, natural systems, especially the hydrological cycle, kind of determine that. But the United Nations know better and have developed this Convention which also suggests that irrigation be ran which is sustainable to areas in jeopardy of desertification and that the inhabitants of those areas are found different lines of work to engage themselves in.
195 countries are a party to this treaty, the United States ratified it on November 17, 2000.
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea does a lot of things. Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) are established in this Convention. EEZ’s extend 200 nautical miles into the ocean. Within this zone, states which have the rights to it are permitted to construct artificial islands, just like China is doing, which will have the effect of expanding their control of the oceans. No military device, fishing by a foreign nation, research activity, survey activity, and propaganda is forbidden in these areas as well.
Landlocked nations are given rights to transit through one or more states to be able to gain access to the sea. While the section regarding the High Seas promises freedom of navigation, overflight, laying cables and pipelines under the sea, artificial island construction, fishing, and scientific research, it also bans any radio or television broadcasts from ships. It also sets up an international court to hear cases when there are disputes.
Truly it is a mammoth document.
The United States is not a party to the UN’s Law of the Sea Convention. 167 countries are; however.
The UN Convention on Climate Change is evil at its core. The UN could have just said, ‘hey guys, ya, we want to kill you and this is how we are going to do it, but, before we get to that point we want you weak, scared, bankrupt financially and spiritually, and sick.’ The UN didn’t say that, but they wrote an objective to this Convention:
“The ultimate objective of this Convention and any related legal instruments that the Conference of the Parties may adopt is to achieve, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Convention, stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Such a level should be achieved within a time-frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner.”
What does this say concisely? Anything the UN dubs a greenhouse gas is man’s fault for being there and we need to stop making those gases immediately. When those gases start including the building blocks of life, then humanity is in hot water. Speaking of water, that, according to many, is a greenhouse gas and so is CO2.
The Convention continues on to demand that developed nations ‘take the lead’ on this one (pay butt-tons of money to non-developed nations), governments control economic activity to reduce emissions, and individual endeavors be curtailed should those endeavors be outside of this UN Convention. It manifests their idea that man-made climate change is because of you and I driving cars and using our dishwashers and stoves. It also creates a global surveillance network monitoring all so-called greenhouse gases emitting from any human activity in order to curtail them. The result of these efforts by the UN will be a technocratic totalitarian one-world regime dictating allowable quotas and measuring every individual’s carbon release into the atmosphere, exhaling included, down to the microgram. Breathe too much and die will be a mantra of these psychotic murderers and their sycophants.
197 nations have signed onto the Convention. The United States is a signatory to this stupid Convention and ratified it on October 15, 1992.
The United Nations is getting its way with their protocols and conventions for the most part. There are a lot of people who are angry at the United States for not signing the Laws of the Sea Convention. I’m angry at the United States too, because the idiot political class is spending my, and my countryman’s extorted tax dollars to pay the debt the idiot class borrows to send money all over the world on the behalf of the United Nations. The United States should immediately withdraw from all of these protocols and Conventions just to retain its sovereignty.
For instance, there are meetings with all of these treaties every year, or maybe every two or three years. The meetings are usually called Conference of the Parties followewd by the number of times the conference has met. The UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow (COP26) met in 2021. They discussed how to further curtail human activities to not allow the temperature to rise by 0.4o ever. A lot of the meeting had to do with the Paris Climate Agreement which was stuck straight into the garbage by the United States when Donald Trump took office in 2017. The US, with all of its economic output, is $30 trillion in debt, facing massive amounts of inflation and rises in the consumer price index, and these bastards at the United Nations and in other nations which are a party to it still persist in demanding the United States get on board and pony up a trillion dollars a year. That is, based on 2020 GDP, the United States is being told by the world at large to pony up 4.77% of their entire GDP and hand it to a bunch of criminals.
Implementing treaties such as the Paris Climate Agreement does several things and the other documents referenced above do the same. First of all they curtail sovereignty in nations which are party to them. Additionally, they add cost to doing business because now there is an extra layer of bureaucracy which no one has control over, it’s not elected, and its not able to be held accountable by the representatives from any country represented. If there is one nation on the planet which has concerns, it really does not make a difference – the UN, particularly in the Paris Climate Accords, is promising trillions of dollars of free aid to about 85% of the nations on earth which more solidly cements their dependence upon the UN. It also more solidly reinforces compliance from those welfare nations.
Any environmental document which speaks to man-made climate change is referring to, not only limiting the building blocks of life, but, destroying the energy sector in nations which already have it well under control, such as the United States, Germany, and France. Enron was a preview for what the United Nations is trying to pull off here. How much economic production will be taking place in the midst of brownouts and rolling blackouts? More importantly, how many people will suffer illness and death from lack of access to heating gases, cheap electricity, and an inability to get food (it takes hydrocarbons to produce fertilizer). The goal of the United Nations seems to be the society depicted in Brave New World combined with the Georgia (the US state) Guidestones.
The first step to defeating this is to understand what is going on. The next step is to demand that action be taken to reverse it. This target’s analysis represents a taste of what is going on and it has been going on for far too long.
As of May 23, 2022, should the demons running the various nations follow through with their intentions, a binding treaty will be signed by nations enrolling it in a plan to have all pandemics handled by the WHO and every nation will have to follow suit or face sanctions which will only further damage the people of earth – that vast humanity which needs to wake up now, because it is just about past midnight already.
Think the COVID-19 lock-downs were bad? Wait until the WHO starts in with it’s already designed and ready to be deployed never ending list of pandemics it seeks to end. It ranges from Disease-X, to other ‘unknown’ pathogens (likely developed in labs around the world), to smoking tobacco, to obesity, to gun violence. You haven’t seen anything yet – but you already tasted it with the insanity of the COVID garbage which persists to this day.
“13.3 Improve education, awareness-raising and human and institutional capacity on climate change mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction and early warning[.]”
I covered this in Goal 12, Target 8. To give a brief analysis, again, I will simply state that the UN has been largely successfully in its educational goals because it is working from a top down structure. The UN has gotten nations around the world to buy into this anthropomorphic climate change narrative and the government sticks the Gaia religion right into the schools of the nations which buy into the narrative. The parents of these children don’t understand the Gaia theory or have any intention to learn about it.
The movie Prometheus was made as a science fiction movie but that is not what it is. It is the way the people at the top of the pyramid think humanity arrived on earth. This battle truly is spiritual because I reject that version of humanity coming upon the earth and embrace that God put us here for a reason. If you have a couple of hours to watch a movie, I suggest you go rent this one and find out just how depraved their version of humanity’s very existence actually is. If nothing else the movie will let you see why these bastards have no qualms with exterminating 95% of the planet – after all these entities are doing their level best to make humanity in their image and, indeed, these creatures see themselves as gods in their own right. Not only are these people not gods, they will do everything in their power to assist Satan in his delusion that he will conquer God almighty when He sends his armies back to earth, under the command of Jesus (Yeshua), and ends all of this treachery.
“13.a Implement the commitment undertaken by developed-country parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to a goal of mobilizing jointly $100 billion annually by 2020 from all sources to address the needs of developing countries in the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation and fully operationalize the Green Climate Fund through its capitalization as soon as possible[.]”
The United Nations is openly declaring global welfare payments are to total at least $100 billion a year, indefinitely. The SDG’s were written in 2015 and the price tag has risen by over 10 times since then.
The United Nations tracked this goal to 2018 on their website. It measures how much money has been sent to the Green Climate Fund from all sources from 2011 to 2018. It has nothing to say about who gave this money, how this money was spent, or even if the entity donating was doing so to it’s agreements. In 2011 the world gave $28.75 billion to this fund. In 2015 the world gave $45.4 billion. In 2016 the Fund was still only getting $49.43 billion. In 2018 the halfway point was reached and $51.93 billion was payed in global welfare. The graph makers, Our World in Data, promises in this graph’s description that the entities making the payments will increase those payments to reach the $100 billion goal by 2020.
I sent an e-mail requesting more information about funding to the Green Climate Fund, which is located in South Korea. As of this time I have not received any information back.
What I did see is that in 2021, the contributed amount totaled $9,677,830,000,000 – just under $10 billion. According to a document dated July 31, 2020, 45 countries, 3 regional bodies, and 1 city (Paris) pledged $6.679 billion with another $2.011.7 billion unconfirmed as of that date.
As far as I can tell, this goal is badly out of shape for the United Nations and the Green Climate Fund did not receive $100 billion in funds in 2019, 2020, 2021, and is probably not looking so good in 2022 either.
Trying to find other sources of this data landed me here which indicated goal 13 is not going well and stated: “[l]ockdowns and other COVID-19 response measures resulted a temporary reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in 2020. However, emissions had almost fully rebounded in later 2020 and are expected to rise further unless critical steps are taken to shift economies toward carbon neutrality.”
Those ‘critical steps’ referred to are more lock-downs. Instead of disease, the lock-downs will be environmentally based; however, the public will not tolerate that and uprisings against the ‘authorities’ will occur if they attempted to effected that out in the open at the present time. Pathogens will be released, food will be cut off, nuclear wars will be promoted (and possibly initiated), and then, maybe, a weary public would submit to climate lock-downs but, until then, the pandemics will reign the supreme lock-down cover to achieve this target.
If the science was accurate about man-made climate change then the reduction in emissions should have correlated with a reduction in temperatures. Of course, this did not happen. Maybe the ‘science’ isn’t quite settled and the factors which play major roles in the earth’s environmental and atmospheric realms are not completely understood to be entered into the climate models the freaks use to demand humanity go into austerity and starve to death?
“13.b Promote mechanisms for raising capacity for effective climate change-related planning and management in least developed countries and small island developing States, including focusing on women, youth and local and marginalized communities * Acknowledging that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is the primary international, intergovernmental forum for negotiating the global response to climate change.[.]”
The UN has tracked this by measuring the number of small island developing nations and least developed nations which have created national adaptation plans to address climate change based on the Framework Convention on Climate Change’s goals. According the UN, there are total of 58 small island developing states and seven of them have accomplished this target for a success rate of 12%. Likewise, six of the 46 Least Developed Nations have accomplished creating climate change adaptation plans for a success rate of 13%.
Some of these small island nations will murder anyone who shows up. There are multiple stories, the most vivid in my mind is the one about a Christian Missionary, John Allen Chau, who was butchered by the inhabitants of North Sentinel Island for even showing up. The place is so dangerous that the Indian government has issued no contact orders with its inhabitants who are armed with bows and arrows and have yet to discover agriculture or fire.
There are many uncontacted people in the world, and most of those people will try to kill anyone who does come into contact with them. Some of them may cannibalize their murder victim. There are groups which work to preserve these murdering peoples because these people have some form of ‘sovereignty.’ Every time the UN mentions indigenous people, they are including these peoples as well.
In most Least Developed Countries, at least in the sub-Saharan African region which makes up the majority of these nations, civil war and the rape of their resources have been at the heart of their troubles, combined with weak, and inefficient governance at any level. Their governments are also corrupt and monies that come to them go into their rulers pockets. Of the seven of the nations given LDC status in eastern Asia, they, also suffered from much the same calamities as their African partners have, and so has Haiti. Most of this violence revolves around tribalism and some of it revolves around Communist revolutions.
Other nations, like Tuvalu and Kiribati, import the majority of the things they have and export almost nothing. Both Island nations have tiny populations, 12,068 and 122,949, respectively. Their ability to grow economically is severely limited., Tuvalu even more so than Kiribati.
What I am getting at here is all of these countries have serious problems which cannot and will not be remedied by climate change mitigation efforts. Could you imagine going to Kiribati and telling the locals – your fishing practices are unsustainable, so you have to stop doing what you are doing and here is your quota on fish per year? The same question applies to Tuvalu. How about the Democratic Republic of the Congo? Could you imagine going there, when the nation is under constant tribal warfare, and demanding the central government build a major infrastructure project, sustainably, in the midst of the warring factions? The people would never get the benefit – the government would ramp up their opposition to the warring tribe and the warring tribe would ramp up their atrocities to protect their perceived asset.
End the wars in the sub-Saharan nations. Then let’s see how they do. End the strife in the Southeast-Asian nation and then lets see how well they do. Those island nations should move to the mainland or figure out what self-sustaining means. If the UN were serious about achieving anything relating to any climate change, man-made or natural, the UN would be seriously stressing over the answers to these problems. Obviously the UN is not doing this. Wars continue, strife continues, self-sustaining economies are not a priority to the UN. The UN shrugs its shoulders while it demand trillions of dollars for environmental justice and has those nations in need of real solutions not trying to solve their domestic problems but waiting for the next infusion of welfare. What a sick idea. This is the world we live in.
Summary
When I say the United Nations has launched a plan to kill you and 7 billion other people I’m not kidding round. That includes me and everyone I love, so I take that threat very seriously. This gola is not going well for the UN, nor the world, which supports this idiotic and murderous goal. Their response will be suppression of speech to combat their ideas, suppression of movement to go to places that matter to protest, and suppression of the right to defend yourself by any means.
Buckle up and read your Bible. Accept Jesus (Yeshua) into your heart. This is going to be a bumpy ride and, if any of us survive this ride, outside of the hive-mind humanity 2.0 these monsters seek to create (those which don’t die from the transformation and are not butchered outright), it will only be due to God’s grace. I encourage all of the readers of this document to do their own research, understand this issue more fully for what it is, and to seek God’s instruction while doing so. Ask God for your calling. Ask Jesus (Yeshua) to enter your life and help you effectively reject this plot. I understand the odds are stacked against all of us, and the effort may be futile in the first place, especially at this late date; however, it is better to try now, even if there is no chance of winning, than to sit idly by and watch humanity be denigrated, altered, alien, and, ultimately damned and dead. All of this is the UN plan. Any government, NGO, or global body which signs up for this plan is just as guilty as the UN is in their aims to murder all of us.
Open a Bible and read it. May God Bless You.
All quotes were found at https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal13 unless otherwise documented.