How are the UN Sustainability Goals Going? Goal 1 of 17.
Tim O’Connor – Center for the Preservation of Humanity 3/20/2022
The seventeen United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the goals of the Great Reset. The SDGs were adopted in 2015 by United Nations’ Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The cover for the SDGs were that they would provide relief for disabled peoples by 2030 according to Agenda 2030. To fully understand Agenda 2030, a review of Agenda 21 should be undertaken, which I will not do here. In this article I will focus on the 1st SDG:
End poverty in all its forms everywhere.
Sounds pretty noble. How are they doing? By their own estimates, not very well. They predict that by 2030, 600 million people will still be living in extreme poverty without policy interventions. The reason the UN cites for this is COVID-19 which, by their calculations, put between 119-124 million into poverty. The extreme poverty rate went from 8.4% to 9.5 % because of the pandemic. In 2019 the extreme poverty rate was 6.6%. The UN suggests that welfare programs be expanded or altogether created in order to mitigate the poverty rate. They seem to actually celebrate the 1,600 COVID-19 relief payment programs instituted by 209 countries.
The UN’s sub-goals to achieve the eradication of poverty are as follows:
“1.1 By 2030, eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day
“1.2 By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions
“1.3 Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable
“1.4 By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to basic services, ownership and control over land and other forms of property, inheritance, natural resources, appropriate new technology and financial services, including microfinance
“1.5 By 2030, build the resilience of the poor and those in vulnerable situations and reduce their exposure and vulnerability to climate-related extreme events and other economic, social and environmental shocks and disasters
“1.a Ensure significant mobilization of resources from a variety of sources, including through enhanced development cooperation, in order to provide adequate and predictable means for developing countries, in particular least developed countries, to implement programmes and policies to end poverty in all its dimensions
“1.b Create sound policy frameworks at the national, regional and international levels, based on pro-poor and gender-sensitive development strategies, to support accelerated investment in poverty eradication actions”
I’m going to break these down one-by-one.
“1.1 By 2030, eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day[.]”
Well, that sounds terrific! How is the United Nations going to get that done? The only vehicle the UN knows to raise people out of poverty is wealth redistribution. In 2018, The United Nations produced a document called Implementation of the Third United Nations Decade for the Eradication of Poverty (2018- 2027). Page 5 of this document concisely sums up the United Nations’ poverty reduction tactics:
“Underscoring that, for all countries, public policies and the mobilization and effective use of domestic resources, underscored by the principle of national ownership, are central to the common pursuit of sustainable development, including achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, and recognizing that domestic resources are first and foremost generated by economic growth, supported by an enabling environment at all levels,” (emphasis mine).
The United Nations is telling us wealth redistribution is what matters most until every single person has the same outcome. Those outcomes will be dictated by the UN or the affiliated country adhering to the UN’s SDGs. That’s Communism pure and simple and it never results in equal outcomes, only suffering and death.
Domestic resources are the people and their talents, the animals, the land, and the resources available in the land (oil, coal, diamonds, lithium, gold, diamonds, etc…). The United Nations has this point completely backwards. The people of these countries need to make something people want from the resources they have and sell those excess goods to foreigners.
By far, the majority of people living in extreme poverty live in sub-Saharan Africa. Their natural resources include copper, oil, gold, diamonds, coal, salt, sulfur, titanium, gypsum, and phosphates. So, if the natural-resource-rich people living in sub-Saharan Africa are so poor why?
It’s because the sub-Saharan nations have governments that HAVE nationalized ownership of their resources. They let foreign nations and their global corporations rape their resources to enrich themselves. These ‘governments’ do this because it makes their tribe more powerful. And by tribe I mean tribe as in tribalism. If you are reading this and are in the West, imagine that the fans of your favorite team are all a tribe and your team wins the championship. In the countries I am writing of that means the ‘government’ will do whatever it takes to promote their team and their brand and their tribe’s culture – including silencing other tribes, marginalizing other tribes, and slaughtering the tribes posing a threat to their tribes dominance. That’s what sports ARE. People ARE tribal but modern Western society has broken that link to tribalism – it only exists in sports teams. In many African nations it is real and in their faces – the barrel of the opposing tribe’s rifle are literally in their faces.
Burundi is a small, landlocked central African nation with a population of over 12 million. Most of the nation is Christian and works in agriculture. Despite producing a lot of food, 40% of the nation is still hungry. It is listed as the poorest nation on earth. The reason is warfare between factions, also called tribes. Burundi sits at an average altitude of 5,600 feet above sea level. They have large reserves of fresh water, peat, nickel, and gold. Being as though Burundi is basically in a permanent civil war, however; they have no ability to develop those resources properly, and have invited outside corporations into their nation to develop the resources. They are being raped. And their people will remain among the poorest in the world for it.
Like Burundi, the Central African Republic (CAR) is torn by warring factions within the nation. CAR is blessed by rich diamond, gold, oil and uranium deposits. The 5 million people there are generally subsistence farmers who export cotton, coffee, and tobacco when they are able, while the government takes most of the profits from trading timber and diamonds.
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is another landlocked African nation that has a GDP per capita of $849.13. Their industry is mining. Over 94 million people have been starved of necessary goods, including food, despite rich deposits of diamonds, gold, cobalt, copper, tin ore, and coltan. Timber, coffee, and oil are also available for enriching the poorest of the poor in the DRC. The United Nations seems to want to ignore their history in this nation by blaming only the companies and rebel groups involved in the illegal exportation of certain resources extracted from the DRC. The United Nations in conjunction with the United States, set this scenario up with their actions in Katanga, where they crushed a democracy-aligned state wishing to be autonomous shortly after the declaration of Congo’s independence. The incident is known as the Katnaga cessation.
It seems to me that all of these countries have violent internal strife and are allowing foreigners to exploit their resources for the government’s gain. Of course the people are poor. Of course they are starving. The warlords shoot at them, the government steals from them, and the foreigners rape their land. A lot of these countries suffer from the same fate.
So is the UN stopping the civil strife? No. Are they telling the multinational companies raping Africa to stop? No. Are they demanding these governments share the wealth from their natural resources? No. So what does the UN do? The UN demands the US, French, UK, German and many other governments to pay the same governments of poor nations. The UN calls it climate reparations. I call it a bunch of bull. If the leader of the DNC is letting multiple civil wars occur and still exporting a good and taking the profits for himself, then get rid of him, allow elections, and strive for peace. Instead the UN sits there, asks for no military assistance, does not demand the leaders take control of their country, and demands that the West is to blame. It’s ludicrous. To bow to the UN’s demands is actually treasonous and places your very soul in jeopardy.
“1.2 By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions[.]”
In 2015, when this measure was adopted, there were an estimated 702 million people living in extreme poverty. As mentioned at the top of this article, the UN estimates that there will still be 600 million living in extreme poverty in 2030 without policy interventions. Or a mass death event. The target of this sub-goal is to have only 351 million people still living in extreme poverty. So, either policy interventions in nations with no recognized legitimate authority in vast ares of their countries will reign their people’s in (this is usually done by government-sponsored terror campaigns to quell discontent) or 249 million people will need to be exterminated. Of course, the UN may just have to forego achieving this sub-goal and try again later.
“1.3 Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable[.]”
Any government that does this is taking a page out of the Lenin’s playbook. It will work just like Lenin’s, Stalin’s, and Khrushchev's USSR too. Everyone will be equally poor. Anyone with ambition to do better than their neighbor had better be ‘in’ with the party or they will be imprisoned or killed outright.
Since I live in the United States, I am very familiar with what Social Security is: a huge ponzi scheme. Most people think they are paying taxes to have the government save it for when they retire. But that’s not correct, the government spends it on the people that are already retired. A 25 year-old understanding this will realize that unless there is an increase in the number of able-bodied children able to fill profitable positions they will get nothing. I’m 44, and I have no doubt that there will be no Social Security monies coming to me if I am ever able to retire.
Setting a floor upon income for each individual will accomplish nothing except to raise the taxes confiscated from the working to present it as a gift to the poor. The United Nations is actually expressing a form of Universal Basic Income (UBI) where every single person gets a check each month to maintain a minimum standard of living. The UN’s form of UBI in this case will come with qualifiers. There are some problems with that, however.
Take for instance my desire to turn the Center for the Preservation of Humanity into either a political party or, more preferably, a 501(c)4 non-profit so that the center could hire lobbyists. Why do I do this? I want to better myself, and to better the city, state, nation, and world in which I live. And I believe that my goals are in line with God’s desires for humanity. If everyone is getting a check every month to eradicate poverty, what is the point of me trying to better myself through efforts like this? Any income I would derive from this effort would be taken away. There would be no profit. Since I believe in God, and believe that humanity is, tragically, cutting themselves off from God through cyborgism, AI, chimerism, digital currencies, and a lack of faith in general, I won’t stop doing this until I am arrested or I am unable to continue on due to lack of electricity, or war in the United States, or health issues, etc….
The floor the UN speaks to works the same way as minimum wages. The person earning the minimum wage, even when it is raised, is no better off than before. Increasing minimum wages only accomplishes three things, all goods and services end up being more expensive, there are less jobs available because employees cost employers too much money, and those with a slightly higher than minimum wage are suddenly making the new minimum wage which actually makes the number of working poor larger.
The United Nations is actually telling the nations of the world that the whole world should actually be poor and dependent upon the government for food, shelter, and income. It really is pretty sick as sub-goal 1.3 is literally an attempt to establish a global totalitarian technocracy. Under this suggestion, all free-will would be stripped away from humanity – the global government will determine what we will think, do, when we will do it, how we will do it and make the level of our compliance with their diktats the basis for where we live, what we eat, if we get water or not, and access to electricity.
Unfortunately COVID-19 came along and the world’s government’s lost their freaking minds. It truly was baffling at the time, at least until the Great Reset was brought to light and then it all made perfect sense. The whole Build Back Better movement instigated by evil men and women is still being shoved down all of our throats, despite COVID-19 being over. But the shutdowns, and lock-downs, and mandates, and death-jabs got billions of people stuck into these social programs. So the UN is pleased at their goal here being fulfilled, at least temporarily. The pilot has been completed. The real roll-out of all of the restrictions of the last 26 months will become much more permanent in the very near future.
“1.4 By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to basic services, ownership and control over land and other forms of property, inheritance, natural resources, appropriate new technology and financial services, including microfinance[.]”
To address the ‘problem’ of 1.1 billion people who have no bank account, in 2017 the World Bank started the, “ID4D program to expand digital identification programs in ways that can help fight poverty.” The man-made COVID-19 scamdemic allowed ID4D to expand without too much hesitation. In 2017, the number of unbanked was 1.7 billion people.
The United Nations, like most with a Communist mindset, completely fail to recognize human nature because they see humans as social-control experiments. Look at what these monsters did with the COVID-19 responses. Not a single measure they took kept a single person safe but billions of people followed along with the restrictions or they were fined and/or imprisoned. It was a huge psychological warfare campaign being carried out against humanity. And the shots they developed was merely a continuation of that psychological war that resulted in millions dead or injured. Steve Quayle nailed this one, “Shot in the arm? Shot in the head? Either way you wind up dead.”
The only way for the UN to accomplish this sub-goal would be by force. By nature people are selfish, some more-so, some less, but in the world we are living in today it is more likely for people to be selfish more often than not. If I owned land, it would be mine, for me to use, as I felt fit. The same goes for anything else I own. So, what the UN is really telling us is the abolition of private property rights, inheritance, natural resources and natural resource developments, new technologies, and financial services. Communism thrives on a Robin-Hood complex of taking something away from anyone or any group or tribe, if you will, who or which exists outside of the party and giving the control of it to themselves and their party-affiliates. The abolition of such rights would also necessitate force, at times lethal. Of course, not a single person would be willing to lift a finger for anyone else, especially anyone who lacks faith or who is in an outside group. This would require more force to get people to go to work and, eventually all new technologies will be created, and exclusively used, by those in power. The labor camps will swell with dissidents….
A note about banking services, however, is that in the current age of everything going digital, it is becoming increasingly easy for banks to dictate their users societal interactions. It is already occurring. Getting more people involved in banking will only serve to enhance and expand the control the banks, representing economic means, and the governments (which are, coincidentally, betrothed to the banks themselves), which represent the force to mandate subservience to the banksters wishes at an institutional, organizational, and individual level.
“1.5 By 2030, build the resilience of the poor and those in vulnerable situations and reduce their exposure and vulnerability to climate-related extreme events and other economic, social and environmental shocks and disasters[.]”
About 68,000 people a year lost their lives to natural disasters between 1994 and 2013. I’ll use that as the baseline. Between 2015 and 2020 the highest worldwide death toll from natural disasters was 22,874 in 2015. Which is good to report. There have been very few deaths from natural disasters over the last 5 years. In 2021 there were 401 natural disasters. In 2019 there were 396, 2016 saw 342, and the average between 2006-2015 was 376.4. Despite there being a slight uptick in the number of qualifying disasters, deaths have remained very low.
The amount of destruction to property and lives a natural disaster does is dependent upon where it occurs. The measurement of what qualifies as a natural disaster is also subject to change. My answer to why there are increasing numbers of natural disasters, especially for all of you thinking that your humanism and transhumanism and whatever false -ism you are living will save you, comes from Luke 21:6-16:
“6 The time is coming when what you see here will be totally destroyed -- not a single stone will be left standing!" 7 They asked him, "Rabbi, if this is so, when will these events take place? And what sign will show that they are about to happen?" 8 He answered, "Watch out! Don't be fooled! For many will come in my name, saying, `I am he!' and, `The time has come!' Don't go after them. 9 And when you hear of wars and revolutions, don't panic. For these things must happen first, but the end will not follow immediately." 10 Then he told them, "Peoples will fight each other, nations will fight each other, 11 there will be great earthquakes, there will be epidemics and famines in various places, and there will be fearful sights and great signs from Heaven. 12 But before all this, they will arrest you and persecute you, handing you over to the synagogues and prisons; and you will be brought before kings and governors. This will all be on account of me, 13 but it will prove an opportunity for you to bear witness. 14 So make up your minds not to worry, rehearsing your defense beforehand; 15 for I myself will give you an eloquence and a wisdom that no adversary will be able to resist or refute. 16 You will be betrayed even by parents, brothers, relatives and friends; some of you they will have put to death;”
“1.a Ensure significant mobilization of resources from a variety of sources, including through enhanced development cooperation, in order to provide adequate and predictable means for developing countries, in particular least developed countries, to implement programmes and policies to end poverty in all its dimensions[.]”
The United Nations is calling for governments to spend their way out of poverty. The United Nations is proposing that education, healthcare, and social protection are what governments should be doing for their people.
The World Bank puts global education expenditures at 13.923% of GDP in 2015 and 13.828% of GDP in 2018. South Sudan reported education expenditures of 0.9% of their GDP in 2018, down from 3.3% in 2015. In 2020, Sierra Leone is reported as spending 34.3% of their GDP, up from 12.5% in 2016 on education. Heavily indebted poor countries have steadily decreased their education expenditures between 2015 (16.7%) and 2020 (13.3%). The countries classified by the UN as Least Developed Countries (LDCs) saw their education expenditures as a percentage of GPD rise slightly from 13.9% in 2015 to 14.6% in 2018. Overall, the UN’s education expenditure goals are a mixed bag.
The United Nations’ Office of Economic and Cooperation and Development (OECD) members spent 8.7% of their GDP on healthcare in 2015. In 2020, that percentage stood at 9.9%. Two factors to take into account are – global GDP shrank significantly in 2020, and we were in a man-made global pandemic which called every public health administrator cockroach out of their hiding spot to take government money and spend it on measures which would do nothing to prevent any illness. Additionally, in the United States thousands of dollars were given to hospitals for very documented COVID-19 hospitalization and tens of thousands for those murdered with a ventilator. The UN’s part in this disgusting murder spree is not lost on people but it did help them to achieve their healthcare expenditure goal here.
When discussing social spending, like healthcare, it requires the reader to keep in mind that global GDP fell precipitously in 2020. Despite the global decline of 2.821 trillion dollars from 2019 to 2020, social spending rose. The Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Liu Zhenmin stated in February of 2022, “that from December 2020 to May 2021, total spending on social protection rose by almost 270 per cent, to $2.9 trillion.” Scumbag globalist cockroach Zhenmin then went on to demand the increases become permanent in the same speech.
The numbers are very interesting here, being as though they are almost identical. Also interesting is that billionaires grew richer by $4 trillion. People say follow the money and the truth will be found. These billionaires who profited massively during the ‘pandemic’ hatched the pandemic in the first place and are the reason we are all suffering and going to continue to suffer.
“1.b Create sound policy frameworks at the national, regional and international levels, based on pro-poor and gender-sensitive development strategies, to support accelerated investment in poverty eradication actions”
What the United Nations is suggesting here is confiscatory tax rates for the rich. Maybe it’s not a bad thing; however, the rich are the ones writing these stupid Communist laws so, it will erode the middle class in practice. Take money from Bezos, Soros, Buffett, and Gates, to give to poor women (also suggested by the UN)? No. That’s not the way it works. It will get taken from those earning a decent amount of yearly income – anyone who can afford the costs of getting themselves through a loophole will.
Whatever policies have been crafted have not led anyone out of poverty. Only capitalism has ever lifted people out of poverty. Can certain types of wealth be fairly spread around? Alaska does it with their oil revenues – every citizen in Alaska gets a check for the revenue their oil produces. Those checks are taxed by the thieves at the IRS, of course, but everyone gets something. The example serves as an example that it can be done fairly though. As for lifting people out of poverty, hardly – 9.6% of Alaska’s residents live below the poverty line of the United States.
Summary
Overall, the United Nations is suggesting throughout their suggestions a bunch of economic policies which will increase poverty rates. What they are striving for is communistic but worse. They are striving for a totalitarian technocratic dictatorship.
All of the UN’s demands revolve around an omnipresent and omnipotent State confiscating and redistributing wealth. It is even suggested that private property rights and inheritance be abolished in these articles.
The COVID-19 scamdemic emboldened the United Nations. The last two years (2020 – 2022 and counting) have been hell for just about everyone everywhere. The stay home mandate will kill millions on its own. The ‘disease’ itself has killed hundreds of thousands. The gene-therapy death jabs (commonly referenced as vaccines – which they are NOT) have killed and sterilized hundreds of thousands. Millions will likely die from being mandated, or brainwashed, or just plain scared into taking this experimental Mengele-worthy concoction. If the United Nations did not see their goals met, they now have an official narrative (COVID-19) from which to demand their goals be met.
I’d love to eradicate poverty too. It just cannot be done without developing industries and the jobs that come from those industries. Being as though development is deemed an evil, the only recourse to move towards ending poverty is now off the table. The United Nations, and all of those in on the Sustainable Development Goals death cult don’t care about poverty. They want to eliminate the impoverished as quietly as possible. I won’t be quiet. Will you?
Open a Bible and read it. May God Bless You.
All quotes were found on 3/20/2022 at https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal1 unless otherwise documented.